Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (892)
- University of Colorado Law School (243)
- University of Montana (195)
- Seattle University School of Law (188)
- Universitas Indonesia (132)
-
- Barry University School of Law (40)
- Fordham Law School (31)
- DePaul University (24)
- West Virginia University (10)
- University of Kentucky (8)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (7)
- University of Michigan Law School (7)
- BLR (5)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (4)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- Purdue University (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- National Law School of India University (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (868)
- State law; State administrative decision; (556)
- State law; State administrative decision (311)
- BLM (84)
- Public lands (70)
-
- United States (70)
- Colorado (56)
- U.S. Bureau of Land Management (53)
- FLPMA (44)
- BMPs (42)
- Best management practices (42)
- National Environmental Policy Act (42)
- NEPA (39)
- Climate change (37)
- Congress (37)
- EPA (36)
- U.S. Forest Service (36)
- Wyoming (36)
- Bureau of Land Management (35)
- Oil and gas development (32)
- Fracking (30)
- Mining (30)
- Hydraulic fracturing (29)
- Environment (28)
- Natural resources law (28)
- Regulation (28)
- Secretary of the Interior (28)
- Fracing (27)
- Law (27)
- Environmental Protection Agency (26)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (892)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (195)
- Seattle University Law Review (184)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (122)
- Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ) (37)
-
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (31)
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (24)
- The Public Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (22)
- Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9) (17)
- Public Lands Mineral Leasing: Issues and Directions (Summer Conference, June 10-11) (16)
- The Past, Present, and Future of Our Public Lands: Celebrating the 40th Anniversary of the Public Land Law Review Commission’s Report, One Third of the Nation’s Land (Martz Summer Conference, June 2-4) (15)
- Getting a Handle on Hazardous Waste Control (Summer Conference, June 9-10) (14)
- Best Practices for Community and Environmental Protection (October 14) (13)
- The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (13)
- The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5) (13)
- Federal Lands, Laws and Policies and the Development of Natural Resources: A Short Course (Summer Conference, July 28-August 1) (12)
- Best Management Practices (BMPs): What? How? And Why? (May 26) (11)
- Best Management Practices and Adaptive Management in Oil and Gas Development (May 12-13) (11)
- Indonesia Law Review (10)
- Natural Gas Symposium: Contract Solutions for the Future of Regulatory Environment (March 24-25) (10)
- Opportunities and Obstacles to Reducing the Environmental Footprint of Natural Gas Development in Uintah Basin (October 14) (10)
- West Virginia Law Review (10)
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law (8)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (7)
- Air Quality Impacts from Oil and Gas Development (January 27) (5)
- Challenging Federal Ownership and Management: Public Lands and Public Benefits (October 11-13) (5)
- ExpressO (5)
- Publications (5)
- Publication Type
Articles 601 - 630 of 1815
Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law
How House Bill 666 And Grass Roots Democracy Won Subdivision Reform For Montana, John Vincent
How House Bill 666 And Grass Roots Democracy Won Subdivision Reform For Montana, John Vincent
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Montana Environmental Information Center, Robin Nichols
The Montana Environmental Information Center, Robin Nichols
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The 1972 Montana State Constitution Declaration Of Rights And The Opportunities On The Bumpy Road Ahead, Rick Applegate
The 1972 Montana State Constitution Declaration Of Rights And The Opportunities On The Bumpy Road Ahead, Rick Applegate
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
My Glory Days: How I Came To Be In The Right Place At The Right Time., Mae Nan Ellingson
My Glory Days: How I Came To Be In The Right Place At The Right Time., Mae Nan Ellingson
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Writing And Ratification Of The 1972 Montana Constitution, Bob Campbell
The Writing And Ratification Of The 1972 Montana Constitution, Bob Campbell
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
Alice Creek, Dolores Colburg
Montana (1959 – 1989) Political Evolution — Political Revolution, Ted Schwinden
Montana (1959 – 1989) Political Evolution — Political Revolution, Ted Schwinden
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appeal No. 0978: Robert W. Fulton & Valorie S. Fulton V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0978: Robert W. Fulton & Valorie S. Fulton V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2019-115 (EAP Ohio, LLC; K Wallace West Unit)
Appeal No. 0983: Golden Eagle Resources Ii, Llc & Siltstone Resources, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0983: Golden Eagle Resources Ii, Llc & Siltstone Resources, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2020-87 (Gulfport Appalachia, LLCC; MEC Northwest Unit)
Appeal No. 0987: Rosalie Christman V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0987: Rosalie Christman V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2020-11
Appeal No. 0967: Florence C. Garver Living Trust V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0967: Florence C. Garver Living Trust V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2018-303
Appeal No. 0975: Robert W. Fulton & Valorie S. Fulton V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0975: Robert W. Fulton & Valorie S. Fulton V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2019-81 (ESP Ohio, LLC; Barrett Unit)
Appeal No. 0977: Robert W. Fulton & Valorie S. Fulton V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0977: Robert W. Fulton & Valorie S. Fulton V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2019-114 (EAP Ohio, LLC; K Wallace East Unit)
Appeal No. 0960: Faith Ranch & Farms Fund, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0960: Faith Ranch & Farms Fund, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-101 & 2018-108 (McBride East & Central Units; EAP Phioo. LLC)
Appeal No. 0979: John F. Williams Oil Field Services, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0979: John F. Williams Oil Field Services, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2019-247
Appeal No. 0976: Energy Exploration & Development, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0976: Energy Exploration & Development, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2019-104
Appeal No. 0961: Faith Ranch & Farms Fund, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0961: Faith Ranch & Farms Fund, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-101 & 2018-108 (McBride East & Central Units; EAP Phioo. LLC)
Appeal No. 0980: C. David Snyder V. Divison Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0980: C. David Snyder V. Divison Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2019-343
Appeal No. 0982: Wheeling & Lake Eries Railway Company V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0982: Wheeling & Lake Eries Railway Company V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2020-01 (Gulfport Appalliachia, LLC; Angelo Unit)
Pakootas V. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd., Connlan W. Whyte
Pakootas V. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd., Connlan W. Whyte
Public Land & Resources Law Review
Throughout the twentieth century, Teck Cominco Metals leaked metal pollutants into the Upper Columbia River that ultimately entered the United States and the Colville Indian Reservation. In 2004, after almost a decade of working with the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Colville Tribes initiated a citizen suit under CERCLA against Teck for damaging the ecosystem of the Upper Columbia River. In 2018, the Ninth Circuit affirmed judgment against Teck for recovery costs and attorney’s fees.
Fmc Corp. V. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Seth T. Bonilla
Fmc Corp. V. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Seth T. Bonilla
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In 1998, FMC Corporation agreed to submit to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes’ permitting processes, including the payment of fees, for clean-up work required as part of consent decree negotiations with the Environmental Protection Agency. Then, in 2002, FMC refused to pay the Tribes under a permitting agreement entered into by both parties, even though the company continued to store hazardous waste on land within the Shoshone-Bannock Fort Hall Reservation in Idaho. FMC challenged the Tribes’ authority to enforce the $1.5 million permitting fees first in tribal court and later challenged the Tribes’ authority to exercise civil regulatory and adjudicatory jurisdiction over …
Juliana V. United States, Anthony Reed
Juliana V. United States, Anthony Reed
Public Land & Resources Law Review
Plaintiffs sued the United States government for promoting activities that were known to pollute the atmosphere and cause climate change. They claimed the government’s policies violated their rights under the substantive due process clause of the Fifth Amendment, the equal protection clause of the Ninth Amendment, and the public trust doctrine. The Ninth Circuit held it was not within the court’s Article III power to create and oversee a comprehensive plan capable of redressing the Plaintiffs’ injuries and, therefore, Plaintiffs lacked standing.
Navajo Nation V. United States Department Of The Interior, Adam W. Johnson
Navajo Nation V. United States Department Of The Interior, Adam W. Johnson
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Navajo Nation sued the United States government alleging the government breached its trust obligation over the allocation of water rights in the Colorado River Basin. On remand, the district court denied the Navajo Nation leave to file its third amended complaint for futility, holding that the general trust relationship was insufficient to support the Nation’s breach of trust claim.
Preview—United States Forest Service V. Cowpasture River Preservation Association: Can The Pipeline Cross The Trail?, Alizabeth Bronsdon
Preview—United States Forest Service V. Cowpasture River Preservation Association: Can The Pipeline Cross The Trail?, Alizabeth Bronsdon
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in this matter on Monday, February 24, 2020, at 10 a.m. in the Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C. Anthony Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, will likely argue for the United States. In a divided oral argument, Paul D. Clement will likely appear for Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, the petitioner in consolidated case No. 18-1587, Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association. Michael K. Kellogg will likely appear for the Respondents.
Appeal No. 0951: Jeffrey Paczewski V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0951: Jeffrey Paczewski V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2017-452 (Peters Unit; Antero Resources Corporation)
Montana Environmental Information Center V. Department Of Environmental Quality, Anthony P. Reed
Montana Environmental Information Center V. Department Of Environmental Quality, Anthony P. Reed
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The DEQ renewed a 1999 MPDES Permit on September 14, 2012 that allowed Western Energy Company to discharge pollutants from the Rosebud Mine into streams. Environmental groups MEIC and the Sierra Club sued, arguing this violated both the Montana Water Quality Act and federal Clean Water Act because the DEQ’s interpretation of its own regulations that exempted waters with ephemeral characteristics from water quality standards was arbitrary and capricious. The district court agreed, but the Montana Supreme Court reversed. It held the DEQ’s interpretation was lawful and remanded for further fact finding to assess how the DEQ applied the interpretation …