Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (1565)
- Constitutional Law (684)
- Courts (488)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (289)
- Legislation (246)
-
- Criminal Procedure (236)
- Judges (222)
- Jurisprudence (182)
- Legal History (163)
- First Amendment (156)
- Law and Race (152)
- State and Local Government Law (152)
- Labor and Employment Law (112)
- Criminal Law (109)
- Fourteenth Amendment (107)
- Evidence (101)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (95)
- Fourth Amendment (89)
- Litigation (87)
- Election Law (86)
- Law and Politics (81)
- Administrative Law (78)
- Law and Gender (70)
- Intellectual Property Law (63)
- Legal Biography (63)
- Civil Procedure (56)
- Law and Society (56)
- Jurisdiction (55)
- Education Law (50)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1180)
- William & Mary Law School (383)
- University of Colorado Law School (125)
- Pepperdine University (56)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (53)
-
- St. Mary's University (46)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (32)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (17)
- University of San Diego (17)
- Georgetown University Law Center (13)
- Northern Illinois University (13)
- Marquette University Law School (12)
- West Virginia University (11)
- University of Miami Law School (10)
- University of Richmond (10)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (6)
- Cleveland State University (6)
- Cornell University Law School (6)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (6)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- New York Law School (5)
- University of Georgia School of Law (5)
- University of New Mexico (5)
- Valparaiso University (5)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- Washington University in St. Louis (5)
- Notre Dame Law School (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- Belmont University (3)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (3)
- Publication
-
- Articles (403)
- Michigan Law Review (403)
- Supreme Court Preview (187)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (133)
- Publications (111)
-
- Faculty Publications (102)
- William & Mary Law Review (62)
- Pepperdine Law Review (51)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (45)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (38)
- Indiana Law Journal (33)
- Faculty Articles (31)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (29)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (26)
- Touro Law Review (26)
- Book Chapters (23)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (20)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (17)
- Popular Media (16)
- Michigan Law Review Online (15)
- Other Publications (15)
- Reviews (15)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (14)
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (14)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (14)
- Law Faculty Publications (13)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (12)
- Northern Illinois University Law Review (12)
- American Indian Law Review (11)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (11)
- Publication Type
Articles 1111 - 1140 of 2103
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Constitution In Exile: Is It Time To Bring It In From The Cold?, William W. Van Alstyne
The Constitution In Exile: Is It Time To Bring It In From The Cold?, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Section 7: Employment Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 7: Employment Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 9: Looking Ahead: Upcoming Issues, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 9: Looking Ahead: Upcoming Issues, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 1: Adarand Constructors V. Mineta, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Adarand Constructors V. Mineta, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 3: Legacy Of Bush V. Gore, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 3: Legacy Of Bush V. Gore, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 2: Direction Of The Rehnquist Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 2: Direction Of The Rehnquist Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 4: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 4: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 5: Criminal Law And Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 5: Criminal Law And Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 6: First Amendment, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 6: First Amendment, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 8: Business Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 8: Business Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 10: Also This Term, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 10: Also This Term, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Criminalization Of True Anonymity In Cyberspace, The, George F. Du Pont
Criminalization Of True Anonymity In Cyberspace, The, George F. Du Pont
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
The question of whether a state or the federal government can create a narrowly tailored restriction on cyberspace anonymity without violating the First Amendment remains unresolved[...]The Supreme Court has not directly addressed the issue, but it may soon consider the constitutionality of criminalizing certain kinds of cyber-anonymity in light of the unique nature of cyberspace. This comment explores the various forms of anonymity, examines the First Amendment status of anonymity in and outside of cyberspace, analyzes relevant scholarly commentary, and concludes that a narrowly tailored legislative restriction on "true" anonymity in cyberspace would not violate the First Amendment.
Daubert's Backwash: Litigation-Generated Science, William L. Anderson, Barry M. Parsons, Drummond Rennie
Daubert's Backwash: Litigation-Generated Science, William L. Anderson, Barry M. Parsons, Drummond Rennie
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
In the 1993 landmark case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, the United States Supreme Court articulated its position on the admissibility of scientific evidence. The Court reasoned that federal judges should rely on the processes scientists use to identify unreliable research, including the process of peer review, to determine when scientific evidence should be inadmissible. In response, lawyers and their clients, seeking to rely on such evidence, have begun funding and publishing their own research with the primary intention of providing support to cases they are litigating. This Article examines the phenomenon of litigation-generated science, how it potentially undermines …
Structural Review, Pseudo-Second-Look Decision Making, And The Risk Of Diluting Constitutional Liberty, Dan T. Coenen
Structural Review, Pseudo-Second-Look Decision Making, And The Risk Of Diluting Constitutional Liberty, Dan T. Coenen
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Subconsitutional Constitutional Law: Supplement, Sham, Or Substitute?, Mark Tushnet
Subconsitutional Constitutional Law: Supplement, Sham, Or Substitute?, Mark Tushnet
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Constitution Of Collaboration: Protecting Fundamental Values With Second-Look Rules Of Interbranch Dialogue, Dan T. Coenen
A Constitution Of Collaboration: Protecting Fundamental Values With Second-Look Rules Of Interbranch Dialogue, Dan T. Coenen
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Religion And The First Amendment: Some Causes Of The Recent Confusion, Carl H. Esbeck
Religion And The First Amendment: Some Causes Of The Recent Confusion, Carl H. Esbeck
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Social Meaning And School Vouchers, Neal Devins
Social Meaning And School Vouchers, Neal Devins
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Who Speaks For The State?: Religious Speakers On Government Platforms And The Role Of Disclaiming Endorsement, Steven H. Aden
Who Speaks For The State?: Religious Speakers On Government Platforms And The Role Of Disclaiming Endorsement, Steven H. Aden
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
The recent Supreme Court decision in Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe prohibits prayer at school-sponsored events. In this Article the author analyzes the development of Supreme Court jurisprudence in the area of religion in public schools. Noting the tension between the Establishment and Free Speech Clauses, the author proposes the use of disclaimers to allow student expression at school events to avoid violating the Establishment Clause.
Direct Measures: An Alternative Form Of Affirmative Action, Daria Roithmayr
Direct Measures: An Alternative Form Of Affirmative Action, Daria Roithmayr
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
Part I of this essay sets out in detail the direct measures affirmative action program. This section also compares the program to other alternative affirmative action program experiments undertaken by various educational institutions. Parts II and III discuss the constitutionality of a direct measures program.
Seeking Redress For Gender-Based Bias Crimes- Charting New Ground In Familiar Legal Territory, Julie Goldscheid, Risa E. Kaufman
Seeking Redress For Gender-Based Bias Crimes- Charting New Ground In Familiar Legal Territory, Julie Goldscheid, Risa E. Kaufman
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
This Essay will analyze how courts have defined gender-motivation, focusing on the Civil Rights Remedy cases decided before the law was struck down, in an attempt to cull from those cases the standards federal courts have used to assess gender-motivation. The article will first provide an overview of existing and proposed laws that offer some form of redress for gender-motivated crimes. It will then analyze cases decided under the Civil Rights Remedy, focusing on two key issues that have arisen as policymakers struggle with whether and how gender-based bias crimes fit in the rubric of hate crimes legislation. The first …
Free-Standing Due Process And Criminal Procedure: The Supreme Court's Search For Interpretive Guidelines, Jerold H. Israel
Free-Standing Due Process And Criminal Procedure: The Supreme Court's Search For Interpretive Guidelines, Jerold H. Israel
Articles
When I was first introduced to the constitutional regulation of criminal procedure in the mid-1950s, a single issue dominated the field: To what extent did the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment impose upon states the same constitutional restraints that the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments imposed upon the federal government? While those Bill of Rights provisions, as even then construed, imposed a broad range of constitutional restraints upon the federal criminal justice system, the federal system was (and still is) minuscule as compared to the combined systems of the fifty states. With the Bill of Rights provisions …
'Appropriate' Means-Ends Constraints On Section 5 Powers, Evan H. Caminker
'Appropriate' Means-Ends Constraints On Section 5 Powers, Evan H. Caminker
Articles
With the narrowing of Congress' Article I power to regulate interstate commerce and to authorize private suits against states, Section Five of the Fourteenth Amendment provides Congress with an increasingly important alternative source of power to regulate and police state conduct. However, in City of Boerne v. Flores and subsequent cases, the Supreme Court has tightened the doctrinal test for prophylactic legislation based on Section Five. The Court has clarified Section Five's legitimate ends by holding that Congress may enforce Fourteenth Amendment rights only as they are defined by the federal judiciary, and the Court has constrained Section Five's permissible …
Trying To Make Peace With Bush V. Gore (Symposium: Bush V. Gore Issue 2001), Richard D. Friedman
Trying To Make Peace With Bush V. Gore (Symposium: Bush V. Gore Issue 2001), Richard D. Friedman
Articles
The Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore, shutting down the recounts of Florida's vote in the 2000 presidential election and effectively awarding the election to George W. Bush, has struck many observers, including myself, as outrageous.' Decisions of the Supreme Court should be more than mere reflections of ideological or partisan preference thinly camouflaged behind legalistic language. It would therefore be pleasant to be able to believe that they are more than that. Accordingly, Judge Richard Posner's analysis,2 in which he defends the result reached by the Court-though not the path by which it got there-is particularly welcome. Though …
From Miranda To §3501 To Dickerson To...(Symposium: Miranda After Dickerson: The Future Of Confession Law), Yale Kamisar
From Miranda To §3501 To Dickerson To...(Symposium: Miranda After Dickerson: The Future Of Confession Law), Yale Kamisar
Articles
Once the Court granted [certiorari in Dickerson] court-watchers knew the hour had come. At long last the Court would have to either repudiate Miranda, repudiate the prophylactic-rule cases [the cases viewing Miranda's requirements as not rights protected by the Constitution, but merely "prophylactic rules"] or offer some ingenious reconciliation of the two lines of precedent. The Supreme Court of the United States, however, doesn't "have to" do anything, as the decision in Dickerson once again reminds us.
Confronting The Reluctant Accomplice, John G. Douglass
Confronting The Reluctant Accomplice, John G. Douglass
Law Faculty Publications
The Supreme Court treats the Confrontation Clause as a rule of evidence that excludes unreliable hearsay. But where the hearsay declarant is an accomplice who refuses to testify at defendant's trial, the Court's approach leads prosecutors and defendants to ignore real opportunities for confrontation, while they debate the reliability of hearsay. And even where the Court's doctrine excludes hearsay, it leads prosecutors to purchase the accomplice's testimony through a process that raises equally serious questions of reliability. Thus, the Court's approach promotes neither reliability nor confrontation. This Article advocates an approach that applies the Confrontation Clause to hearsay declarants in …
The Search For Incontrovertible Visual Evidence, Paul F. Campos
The Search For Incontrovertible Visual Evidence, Paul F. Campos
Publications
No abstract provided.
'Bush' V. 'Gore': What Was The Supreme Court Thinking?, Richard D. Friedman
'Bush' V. 'Gore': What Was The Supreme Court Thinking?, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
One of the most astonishing episodes in American political history ended last month with perhaps the most imperial decision ever by the United States Supreme Court. In one stroke, the Court exercised power that belonged to Congress, the legislature of Florida, Florida's courts and administrators, and, most importantly, the people of the state.
Federalism, Preclearance, And The Rehnquist Court, Ellen D. Katz
Federalism, Preclearance, And The Rehnquist Court, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
Lopez v. Monterey County is an odd decision. Justice O'Connor's majority opinion easily upholds the constitutionality of a broad construction of section 5 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) in language reminiscent of the Warren Court. Acknowledging the "substantial 'federalism costs" resulting from the VRA's "federal intrusion into sensitive areas of state and local policymaking," Lopez recognizes that the Reconstruction Amendments "contemplate" this encroachment into realms "traditionally reserved to the States." Justice O'Connor affirms as constitutionally permissible the infringement that the section 5 preclearance process "by its nature" effects on state sovereignty, and applies section 5 broadly, holding the statute …
Miranda And Some Puzzles Of 'Prophylactic' Rules, Evan H. Caminker
Miranda And Some Puzzles Of 'Prophylactic' Rules, Evan H. Caminker
Articles
Constitutional law scholars have long observed that many doctrinal rules established by courts to protect constitutional rights seem to "overprotect" those rights, in the sense that they give greater protection to individuals than those rights, as abstractly understood, seem to require.' Such doctrinal rules are typically called "prophylactic" rules.2 Perhaps the most famous, or infamous, example of such a rule is Miranda v. Arizona,' in which the Supreme Court implemented the Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination4 with a detailed set of directions for law enforcement officers conducting custodial interrogations, colloquially called the Miranda warnings. 5