Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Fourth Amendment (100)
- Constitutional Law (76)
- Criminal Procedure (27)
- Criminal Law (22)
- Supreme Court of the United States (15)
-
- Evidence (12)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (9)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (7)
- Courts (6)
- Fourteenth Amendment (5)
- First Amendment (3)
- Privacy Law (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Second Amendment (2)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Computer Law (1)
- European Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Military, War, and Peace (1)
- National Security Law (1)
- Institution
-
- William & Mary Law School (85)
- Selected Works (23)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (9)
- George Washington University Law School (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
-
- University of South Carolina (2)
- Duke Law (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Oklahoma City University School of Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Publications (23)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (22)
- William & Mary Law Review (19)
- Adam M. Gershowitz (9)
- Touro Law Review (9)
-
- Popular Media (7)
- Appellate and Supreme Court Clinic (5)
- Fredric I. Lederer (3)
- Jeffrey Bellin (3)
- Supreme Court Preview (3)
- William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice (3)
- Articles (2)
- Briefs (2)
- GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works (2)
- Marc J. Blitz (2)
- South Carolina Law Review (2)
- Charles Cantrell (1)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- James Y. Stern (1)
- Jesse Carter Opinions (1)
- LLM Theses and Essays (1)
- Luke Milligan (1)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (1)
- Paul Marcus (1)
- Peter A. Alces (1)
- Russell L. Weaver (1)
- Supreme Court Case Files (1)
- Thomas E. Baker (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 120 of 131
Full-Text Articles in Law
Wake Up And Smell The Contraband: Why Courts That Do Not Find Probable Cause Based On Odor Alone Are Wrong, Michael A. Sprow
Wake Up And Smell The Contraband: Why Courts That Do Not Find Probable Cause Based On Odor Alone Are Wrong, Michael A. Sprow
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court's 1998-1999 Term: Fourth Amendment Decisions, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Supreme Court's 1998-1999 Term: Fourth Amendment Decisions, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Public School Officials' Use Of Physical Force As A Fourth Amendment Seizure: Protecting Students From The Constitutional Chasm Between The Fourth And Fourteenth Amendments, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Public School Officials' Use Of Physical Force As A Fourth Amendment Seizure: Protecting Students From The Constitutional Chasm Between The Fourth And Fourteenth Amendments, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Fourth Amendment Issues In Section 1983 Litigation, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Fourth Amendment Issues In Section 1983 Litigation, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Challenge Of Prosecuting Organized Crime In The United States: Procedural Issues, Paul Marcus
The Challenge Of Prosecuting Organized Crime In The United States: Procedural Issues, Paul Marcus
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Section 4: Criminal Law And Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 4: Criminal Law And Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Pleading The Fourth, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Choosing Perspectives In Criminal Procedure, Ronald J. Bacigal
Choosing Perspectives In Criminal Procedure, Ronald J. Bacigal
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
In this Article, Professor Bacigal examines the Supreme Court's use of various perspectives in examining the reasonableness of searches and seizures. Although the Supreme Court purports to rely on a consistent method of constitutional analysis when rendering decisions on Fourth Amendment issues, the case law in this area indicates that the Court is influenced sometimes by the citizen's perspective, sometimes by the police officers' perspective, and sometimes by the perspective of the hypothesized reasonable person.
After identifying the role of perspectives in a number of seminal Court decisions, Professor Bacigal discusses the benefits and limitations of the Court's reliance on …
Ad Hoc Adjudication: People V. Champion, Another Confusing Element In The Turmoil Following Minnesota V. Dickerson, Audra A. Dial
Ad Hoc Adjudication: People V. Champion, Another Confusing Element In The Turmoil Following Minnesota V. Dickerson, Audra A. Dial
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 9: Criminal Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 9: Criminal Law, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Dangerous Misperceptions: Protecting Police Officers, Society, And The Fourth Amendment Right To Personal Security, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Dangerous Misperceptions: Protecting Police Officers, Society, And The Fourth Amendment Right To Personal Security, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Fourth Amendment Protection Against Unreasonable Searches And Seizures And The French Experience, Florence Sophie Boreil
The Fourth Amendment Protection Against Unreasonable Searches And Seizures And The French Experience, Florence Sophie Boreil
LLM Theses and Essays
Under the American approach to criminal justice, freedom of the individual is of the utmost importance. The American criminal justice system reflects a distrust of abuse of power and an emphasis on protection of personal freedom. However, the French take a contrary approach; under French law, freedom is achieved through the State. This paper examines the protection of individuals’ rights in American and French criminal procedure. Focus will be given to tracking the police investigatory powers in each country through searches and seizures, and the impact that those powers have on individuals’ rights. This paper will assert that the police …
The Warren Court And Criminal Justice: A Quarter-Century Retrospective, Yale Kamisar
The Warren Court And Criminal Justice: A Quarter-Century Retrospective, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Many commentators have observed that when we speak of "the Warren Court," we mean the Warren Court that lasted from 1962 (when Arthur Goldberg replaced Felix Frankfurter) to 1969 (when Earl Warren retired). But when we speak of the Warren Court's "revolution" in American criminal procedure we mean the Warren Court that lasted from 1961 (when the landmark case of Mapp v. Ohio was decided) to 1966 or 1967. In its final years, the Warren Court was not the same Court that had handed down Mapp or Miranda v. Arizona.
Does The Fourth Amendment Apply To The Armed Forces?, Fredric I. Lederer, Frederic L. Borch
Does The Fourth Amendment Apply To The Armed Forces?, Fredric I. Lederer, Frederic L. Borch
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Central Meaning Of The Fourth Amendment, Tracey Maclin
The Central Meaning Of The Fourth Amendment, Tracey Maclin
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Virtues (And Limits) Of Shared Values: The Fourth Amendment And Miranda's Concept Of Custody, Richard A. Williamson
Virtues (And Limits) Of Shared Values: The Fourth Amendment And Miranda's Concept Of Custody, Richard A. Williamson
Faculty Publications
Miranda only protects suspects who the police subject to custodial interrogation. The concept of custody is tethered to the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination; thus, to render a suspect in custody, law enforcement officials must subject the suspect to a compelling environment that tends to undermine that privilege. In this article, Professor Richard A. Williamson examines the application of Miranda to Terry stops. He reviews the impact of the Beheler and Berkemer decisions, which held that suspects who officials stop based on reasonable suspicion, as opposed to suspects who officials arrest, are not entitled to Miranda warnings. Professor Williamson generally …
"Accidental" Shootings As Fourth Amendment Seizures, Kathryn R. Urbonya
"Accidental" Shootings As Fourth Amendment Seizures, Kathryn R. Urbonya
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
An End Run Around The Exclusionary Rule: The Use Of Illegally Seized Evidence Under The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Victor Jay Miller
An End Run Around The Exclusionary Rule: The Use Of Illegally Seized Evidence Under The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Victor Jay Miller
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mass Drug Testing: The Hidden Long-Term Costs, Craig M. Cornish, Donald B. Louria
Mass Drug Testing: The Hidden Long-Term Costs, Craig M. Cornish, Donald B. Louria
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Abridged Too Far: Anticipatory Search Warrants And The Fourth Amendment, Michael J. Flannery
Abridged Too Far: Anticipatory Search Warrants And The Fourth Amendment, Michael J. Flannery
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
"The Right Of The People To Be Secure...": Toward A Metatheory Of The Fourth Amendment, Thomas E. Baker
"The Right Of The People To Be Secure...": Toward A Metatheory Of The Fourth Amendment, Thomas E. Baker
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Search Warrants: A View Of The Process, Charles Cantrell
Search Warrants: A View Of The Process, Charles Cantrell
Charles Cantrell
No abstract provided.