Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
-
- University of Miami Law School (11)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University (3)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (3)
-
- West Virginia University (3)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (2)
- The University of Akron (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Santa Clara Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- University of Miami Law Review (11)
- Touro Law Review (4)
- Hofstra Law Review (3)
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Villanova Law Review (3)
-
- West Virginia Law Review (3)
- Akron Law Review (2)
- Louisiana Law Review (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- Santa Clara Law Review (1)
- William Mitchell Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 39
Full-Text Articles in Law
Sixth Amendment; Right Of Confrontation; Unavailalbe Witness; State V. Roberts, Christopher C. Manthey, Carol G. Simonetti
Sixth Amendment; Right Of Confrontation; Unavailalbe Witness; State V. Roberts, Christopher C. Manthey, Carol G. Simonetti
Akron Law Review
"THE SIXTH AMENDMENT to the Constitution states that "[iln all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to be confronted with the witnesses against him .... ." This seems simple and absolute, but case law has proven it to be neither; almost every phrase has been dissected and interpreted by courts and commentators. In fact, there may be more law review articles on this subject than there are cases.1 Some of the questions that could be asked are: What is meant by "all criminal prosecutions?" Does this require confrontation in preliminary hearings? Does "shall enjoy the …
Sixth Amendment; Right Of Confrontation Limitations On The Bruton Rule; Parker V. Randolph, Edward P. Mazak
Sixth Amendment; Right Of Confrontation Limitations On The Bruton Rule; Parker V. Randolph, Edward P. Mazak
Akron Law Review
In some joint criminal trials the right of one defendant to refrain from self incrimination may come into conflict with the right of another defendant to confront the witnesses against him. The problem arises when one defendant refuses to testify at trial after having made a voluntary, out of court statement which tends to implicate a second defendant. The rules of evidence allow the statement to be introduced at trial only against the party making it; its use against the implicated defendant is excluded as hearsay.' The rules also provide for the court to instruct the jury on the limited …
Confronting The Confrontation Clause: Addressing The Unanswered Question Of Whether Autopsy Reports Are Testimonial Evidence - People V. Hall, Bailey Ince
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Court Of Appeals Of New York - People V. Leon, Madeline Katz, Madeline Klotz
Court Of Appeals Of New York - People V. Leon, Madeline Katz, Madeline Klotz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Appellate Division, First Department - People V. Williams, Brian E. Peterson
Appellate Division, First Department - People V. Williams, Brian E. Peterson
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Justice, Akhil Reed Amar
The Right To Confrontation Compromised: Monolingual Jurists Subjectively Assessing The English-Language Abilities Of Spanish-Dominant Accused, Lupe S. Salinas, Janelle Martinez
The Right To Confrontation Compromised: Monolingual Jurists Subjectively Assessing The English-Language Abilities Of Spanish-Dominant Accused, Lupe S. Salinas, Janelle Martinez
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
How To Deal With Laboratory Reports Under Crawford V. Washington: A Question With No Good Answer, Cyrus P.W. Rieck
How To Deal With Laboratory Reports Under Crawford V. Washington: A Question With No Good Answer, Cyrus P.W. Rieck
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Crawford/Davis "Testimonial" Interpreted, Removing The Clutter: Application Summary, Michael H. Graham
Crawford/Davis "Testimonial" Interpreted, Removing The Clutter: Application Summary, Michael H. Graham
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Children As Witnesses: A Symposium On Child Competence And The Accused's Right To Confront Child Witnesses, Aviva A. Orenstein
Children As Witnesses: A Symposium On Child Competence And The Accused's Right To Confront Child Witnesses, Aviva A. Orenstein
Indiana Law Journal
The papers in this symposium were originally prepared for the Section on Evidence of the 2007 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Law Schools.
Comments On Child Abuse Litigation In A "Testimonial" World: The Intersection Of Competency, Hearsay, And Confrontation, Myrna S. Raeder
Comments On Child Abuse Litigation In A "Testimonial" World: The Intersection Of Competency, Hearsay, And Confrontation, Myrna S. Raeder
Indiana Law Journal
The papers in this symposium were originally prepared for the Section on Evidence of the 2007 Annual Meeting of the Association of American Law Schools.
Cross-Examination Earlier Or Later: When Is It Enough To Satisfy Crawford?, Christopher B. Mueller
Cross-Examination Earlier Or Later: When Is It Enough To Satisfy Crawford?, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Right To Submit Testimony Via 911 Emergency After Crawford V. Washington, Sweta Patel
The Right To Submit Testimony Via 911 Emergency After Crawford V. Washington, Sweta Patel
Santa Clara Law Review
No abstract provided.
Child's Play: Avoiding The Pitfalls Of Crawford V. Washington In Child Abuse Prosecution, Matthew M. Staab
Child's Play: Avoiding The Pitfalls Of Crawford V. Washington In Child Abuse Prosecution, Matthew M. Staab
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Expanding Forfeiture Without Sacrificing Confrontation After Crawford, Joshua Deahl
Expanding Forfeiture Without Sacrificing Confrontation After Crawford, Joshua Deahl
Michigan Law Review
The central holding of Crawford v. Washington is fairly straightforward: The Confrontation Clause bars the admission of out-of-court testimonial statements unless the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the witness. Crawford, however, has an often overlooked caveat. In renouncing numerous exceptions to the confrontation right, the Court rejected only those that purport to test the reliability of testimonial statements. It left equitable exceptions undisturbed. As the Court pointed out, "[T]he rule of forfeiture by wrongdoing (which we accept) extinguishes confrontation claims on essentially equitable grounds." The parameters of the rule of forfeiture are a matter of some dispute. …
Crawford V. Washington: A Small Advantage For Criminal Defense In Cases Where Prosecution Seeks To Introduce Hearsay Evidence, Jason W. Eldridge
Crawford V. Washington: A Small Advantage For Criminal Defense In Cases Where Prosecution Seeks To Introduce Hearsay Evidence, Jason W. Eldridge
William Mitchell Law Review
This article will examine the Crawford holding and its effects on hearsay law in criminal trials in Minnesota. First, it will attempt to explain the Crawford holding and the Supreme Court’s analysis. Next, it will examine Crawford’s general effect on the Minnesota Rules of Evidence concerning hearsay. Then, this article will consider Crawford’s effect upon criminal cases and some of the arguments it presents for criminal defense attorneys and prosecutors. Finally, this article will conclude that the Crawford decision is a small boon for criminal defense attorneys.
Evidence—Sixth Amendment And The Confrontation Clause—Testimonial Trumps Reliable: The United States Supreme Court Reconsiders Its Approach To The Confrontation Clause. Crawford V. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004)., Kristen Sluyter
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Future Implications Of Lilly V. Virginia, Jennifer Christianson
The Future Implications Of Lilly V. Virginia, Jennifer Christianson
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Response To Professor Mueller, Jennifer Christianson
A Response To Professor Mueller, Jennifer Christianson
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Florida Supreme Court Vs. The United States Supreme Court: The Florida Decision In Conner V. State And The Federal Interpretation Of Confrontation And Federal Rule Of Evidence 807, Stacey Schulman
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Casting Light On The Gray Area: An Analysis Of The Use Of Neutral Pronouns In Non-Testifying Codefendant Redacted Confessions Under Bruton, Richardson, And Gray, Bryant M. Richardson
Casting Light On The Gray Area: An Analysis Of The Use Of Neutral Pronouns In Non-Testifying Codefendant Redacted Confessions Under Bruton, Richardson, And Gray, Bryant M. Richardson
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tales Out Of School-Spillover Confessions And Against-Interest Statements Naming Others, Professor Christopher B. Mueller
Tales Out Of School-Spillover Confessions And Against-Interest Statements Naming Others, Professor Christopher B. Mueller
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rebuttal, Bryant M. Richardson
The X Files: Joint Trials, Redacted Confessions And Thirty Years Of Sidestepping Bruton, Judith L. Ritter
The X Files: Joint Trials, Redacted Confessions And Thirty Years Of Sidestepping Bruton, Judith L. Ritter
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Admitting Confessions Of Codefendants: Has Lee V. Illinois Created An Additional Hearsay Exception?, Christine Noworyta
Admitting Confessions Of Codefendants: Has Lee V. Illinois Created An Additional Hearsay Exception?, Christine Noworyta
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
White V. Illinois And The "Hearsay Clause" Of The Sixth Amendment, Hansel M. Harlan
White V. Illinois And The "Hearsay Clause" Of The Sixth Amendment, Hansel M. Harlan
Louisiana Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Law And Economics Analysis Of The Right To Face-To-Face Confrontation Post-Maryland V. Craig: Distinguishing The Forest From The Trees, Peter T. Wendel
A Law And Economics Analysis Of The Right To Face-To-Face Confrontation Post-Maryland V. Craig: Distinguishing The Forest From The Trees, Peter T. Wendel
Hofstra Law Review
No abstract provided.
Beyond Maryland V. Craig: Can And Should Adult Rape Victims Be Permitted To Testify By Closed-Circuit Television?, Lisa Hamilton Thielmeyer
Beyond Maryland V. Craig: Can And Should Adult Rape Victims Be Permitted To Testify By Closed-Circuit Television?, Lisa Hamilton Thielmeyer
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Idaho V. Wright: The Defenestration Of Corroborating Evidence, John Clairborne Koski
Idaho V. Wright: The Defenestration Of Corroborating Evidence, John Clairborne Koski
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.