Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (82)
- Legal Profession (33)
- Criminal Law (14)
- Constitutional Law (9)
- Criminal Procedure (8)
-
- Jurisprudence (8)
- International Law (6)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (6)
- Arts and Humanities (5)
- Legal Education (5)
- Legal History (5)
- Legal Studies (5)
- Philosophy (5)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (5)
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- Law and Psychology (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Medical Jurisprudence (3)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Conflict of Laws (2)
- Courts (2)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (2)
- European Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- International Trade Law (2)
- Institution
-
- Pace University (25)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (14)
- William & Mary Law School (14)
- American University Washington College of Law (12)
- University of San Diego (7)
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (5)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (5)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (2)
- Howard University (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of New Mexico (1)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (1)
- Valparaiso University (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (25)
- Faculty Scholarly Works (14)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (12)
- William & Mary Annual Tax Conference (11)
- All Faculty Scholarship (7)
-
- University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series (6)
- Working Paper Series (5)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Articles & Chapters (2)
- College of Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- University of San Diego Law and Economics Research Paper Series (1)
Articles 31 - 60 of 96
Full-Text Articles in Law
Do Judges Systematically Favor The Interests Of The Legal Profession? , Benjamin H. Barton
Do Judges Systematically Favor The Interests Of The Legal Profession? , Benjamin H. Barton
College of Law Faculty Scholarship
This Article answers this question with the following jurisprudential hypothesis: many legal outcomes can be explained, and future cases predicted, by asking a very simple question, is there a plausible legal result in this case that will significantly affect the interests of the legal profession (positively or negatively)? If so, the case will be decided in the way that offers the best result for the legal profession.
The article presents theoretical support from the new institutionalism, cognitive psychology and economic theory. The Article then gathers and analyzes supporting cases from areas as diverse as constitutional law, torts, professional responsibility, employment …
Valuing The Waiver: The Real Beauty Of Ex Ante Over Ex Post, Robert C. Hockett
Valuing The Waiver: The Real Beauty Of Ex Ante Over Ex Post, Robert C. Hockett
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Irony abounds in connection with demands and proposals made, in the wake of the Enron, Worldcom, and other corporate scandals, that firms be required or encouraged to waive attorney-client privilege. Justice Department officials speak to the importance of "getting at the truth" as trumping firms' interest in confidential internal communications as a prerequisite to compliance with law. They do so notwithstanding their own contrary arguments made on behalf of the secretive Bush administration that employs them. Corporate officers, for their part, speak as though Ralph Nader were the Attorney General when they denounce waiver proposals. They do so notwithstanding the …
Overview Of Opr And Circular 230 Cases, Cono R. Namorato
Overview Of Opr And Circular 230 Cases, Cono R. Namorato
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Of Apples And Trees: Adoption And Informed Consent, Ellen Wertheimer
Of Apples And Trees: Adoption And Informed Consent, Ellen Wertheimer
Working Paper Series
This article argues that the doctrine of informed consent should apply to the process of adopting a child. There is substantial evidence that all adopted children are at higher risk of learning disabilities and mental health problems than nonadopted children. The article first summarizes the social science evidence demonstrating these risks and discusses some of the reasons why more extensive studies have not yet been done. The article then turns to the law of informed consent as created and applied in the contexts of medicine and law, and concludes that informed consent doctrine should apply to the process of adoption. …
Power As A Factor In Lawyers' Ethical Deliberation, Susan Carle
Power As A Factor In Lawyers' Ethical Deliberation, Susan Carle
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Pursuing Justice For The Mentally Disabled, Grant H. Morris
Pursuing Justice For The Mentally Disabled, Grant H. Morris
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
This article considers whether lawyers act as zealous advocates when they represent mentally disordered, involuntarily committed patients who wish to assert their right to refuse treatment with psychotropic medication. After discussing a study that clearly demonstrates that lawyers do not do so, the article explores the reasons for this inappropriate behavior. Michael Perlin characterizes the problem as “sanism,” which he describes as an irrational prejudice against mentally disabled persons of the same quality and character as other irrational prejudices that cause and are reflected in prevailing social attitudes of racism, sexism, homophobia, and ethnic bigotry. The article critiques Perlin’s characterization …
Corporate Ethics In The Health Care Marketplace, Lynne Dallas
Corporate Ethics In The Health Care Marketplace, Lynne Dallas
University of San Diego Law and Economics Research Paper Series
Consider three examples of problematic corporate decision making: first, in 2002, employees were less likely to have employer-provided insurance than thirty years ago and the price of health care for those who do receive it is ever increasing. Second, while many employees are without health insurance, the compensation for chief executive officers and other executive officers has increased dramatically. Third, consider the well-publicized examples of corporate decisions to engage in fraudulent and unethical business practices.
These problems will not be solved by glib references to market ideology that claims markets alone adequately regulate corporate behavior. Nor will these problems be …
The Academic Expert Before Congress: Observations And Lessons From Bill Van Alstyne's Testimony, Neal Devins
The Academic Expert Before Congress: Observations And Lessons From Bill Van Alstyne's Testimony, Neal Devins
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Keeping Up Appearances: A Process-Oriented Approach To Judicial Recusal, Amanda Frost
Keeping Up Appearances: A Process-Oriented Approach To Judicial Recusal, Amanda Frost
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
"Lawyers For Lawyers": The Emerging Role Of Law Firm Legal Counsel, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.
"Lawyers For Lawyers": The Emerging Role Of Law Firm Legal Counsel, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Prosecutorial Ethics And Victims' Rights: The Prosecutor's Duty Of Neutrality, Bennett L. Gershman
Prosecutorial Ethics And Victims' Rights: The Prosecutor's Duty Of Neutrality, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
In recent years, enhanced legal protections for victims has caused victims to become increasingly involved in the criminal justice process, often working closely with prosecutors. In this Article, Professor Gershman analyzes the potential challenges to prosecutors' ethical duties that victims'participation may bring and suggests appropriate responses.
U.S. Legal Ethics: The Coming Of Age Of Global And Comparative Perspectives, Laurel Terry
U.S. Legal Ethics: The Coming Of Age Of Global And Comparative Perspectives, Laurel Terry
Faculty Scholarly Works
This Article reviews the influence of comparative law during the past 100 years and then divides the last 100 years into three distinct comparative legal ethics eras. The first era consists of the time period between 1904 and 1973, during which there was both domestic and comparative legal ethics scholarship, although a relatively small amount compared to later years. The second time period, which dates from 1974, when legal ethics became a required course, to 1997, represents the coming of age of domestic legal ethics scholarship. This time period also included a significant amount of legal ethics scholarship employing a …
Tax Advisor-Client Privileges And Circular 230 Revisions, B. John Williams, Stephan F. Tucker
Tax Advisor-Client Privileges And Circular 230 Revisions, B. John Williams, Stephan F. Tucker
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
Lawyer Marketing: An Ethics Guide, Thomas E. Spahn
Lawyer Marketing: An Ethics Guide, Thomas E. Spahn
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
The Tenuous Case For Conscience, Steven D. Smith
The Tenuous Case For Conscience, Steven D. Smith
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
If there is any single theme that has provided the foundation of modern liberalism and has infused our more specific constitutional commitments to freedom of religion and freedom of speech, that theme is probably “freedom of conscience.” But some observers also perceive a progressive cheapening of conscience– even a sort of degradation. Such criticisms suggest the need for a contemporary rethinking of conscience. When we reverently invoke “conscience,” do we have any idea what we are talking about? Or are we just exploiting a venerable theme for rhetorical purposes without any clear sense of what “conscience” is or why it …
Prosecutorial Neutrality, Fred C. Zacharias, Bruce A. Green
Prosecutorial Neutrality, Fred C. Zacharias, Bruce A. Green
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
This Article examines the ideal of prosecutorial neutrality in an effort to determine its value as a measure of prosecutorial conduct. Commentators often have assumed that prosecutors should be “neutral” in making discretionary decisions or have criticized prosecutors for decisions that purportedly demonstrate a lack of neutrality. The notion of prosecutorial neutrality recalls the traditional conception of prosecutors as “quasi-judicial” officers and emphasizes the distinction between prosecutors and lawyers for private parties. But the specific meaning attributed to prosecutorial neutrality has varied depending on the context. The term refers to diverse, and potentially inconsistent, views of appropriate prosecutorial conduct. The …
Understanding Recent Trends In Federal Regulation Of Lawyers, Fred C. Zacharias
Understanding Recent Trends In Federal Regulation Of Lawyers, Fred C. Zacharias
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
Federal lawmakers increasingly have taken actions that contradict, interfere with, or preempt state regulation of lawyers. Most of the commentary regarding the recent federal actions has focused on whether individual regulations are substantively justified. It is, however, worth considering more broadly whether and how the phenomenon of increasing federal regulation is symptomatic of changing views of appropriate professional regulation. This article considers a series of theoretical analyses of the increasing federal regulation -- themes and trends that the increasing regulation might represent or epitomize. Whenever the bar or other commentators criticize developments in professional regulation, it is important to place …
Lawyers As Gatekeepers, Fred C. Zacharias
Lawyers As Gatekeepers, Fred C. Zacharias
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
Three recent legislative and regulatory initiatives -- the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the 2003 amendments to Model Rules 1.6 and 1.13, and the Gatekeeper Initiative – all seek to enlist the assistance of lawyers in thwarting crime. Outraged opponents have relied on flamboyant rhetoric. They challenge the notion that lawyers should act as gatekeepers – which some of the opponents deem equivalent to operating like the “secret police in Eastern European countries.” This article makes a simple, and ultimately uncontroversial, point. Lawyers are gatekeepers, and always have been. Whatever one’s position on the merits of the specific reforms currently being proposed, it …
Mental Disorder And The Civil/Criminal Distinction, Grant H. Morris
Mental Disorder And The Civil/Criminal Distinction, Grant H. Morris
University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series
This essay, written as part of a symposium issue to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the University of San Diego Law School, discusses the evaporating distinction between sentence-serving convicts and mentally disordered nonconvicts who are involved in, or who were involved in, the criminal process–people we label as both bad and mad. By examining one Supreme Court case from each of the decades that follow the opening of the University of San Diego School of Law, the essay demonstrates how the promise that nonconvict mentally disordered persons would be treated equally with other civilly committed mental patients was made and …
Lawyers In The Moral Maze , Mark A. Sargent
Lawyers In The Moral Maze , Mark A. Sargent
Working Paper Series
This article overviews the various forms of lawyer complicity in illegal or immoral behavior by corporate managers in the corporate scandals of the last three years, but focuses primarily on the question of why lawyers so often seemed willing to engage in or ignore behavior that presumably violated their own personal moral codes (whether religious or secular) as well as their professional role morality. The article draws on Robert Jackall's Moral Mazes (1988) for an answer derived from the sociology of corporate bureaucracies. Jackall's case studies of corporate managers found that managers adhered to the moral "rules-in-use" developed in their …
Prison Reform Revisited: The Unfinished Agenda, Michael B. Mushlin
Prison Reform Revisited: The Unfinished Agenda, Michael B. Mushlin
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Prison Reform Revisited: The Unfinished Agenda, which was held at Pace Law School from October 16-18, 2003, was a remarkable event. At this conference--a summit really--leading academics, attorneys, prison reformers, judges, prison officials and international prison reformers gathered at Pace Law School and the New York State Judicial Center in White Plains, New York to discuss how to advance the cause of prison reform in the U.S. This issue of the Pace Law Review is devoted to the papers presented in connection with that important conference.
Lawyers In The Perfect Storm, Mark A. Sargent
Lawyers In The Perfect Storm, Mark A. Sargent
Working Paper Series
The multiple corporate collapses and scandals of recent years, for which "Enron" is a convenient shorthand, resulted from a perfect storm in which regulatory oversight, the law of fiduciary duty, gatekeepers, market discipline, and contractual incentives all failed to prevent gross self-dealing, conflicts of interest, and deception, or themselves produced perverse consequences. The story of this simultaneous failure of the structures in place since the New Deal and before, has received considerable attention in both the popular and scholarly literature, but is summarized here to provide a context for consideration of the contributions that lawyers made to the perfect storm. …
Securities Analysts' Undisclosed Conflicts Of Interest: Unfair Dealing Or Securities Fraud?, Jill I. Gross
Securities Analysts' Undisclosed Conflicts Of Interest: Unfair Dealing Or Securities Fraud?, Jill I. Gross
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This article addresses recent regulatory efforts to proscribe undisclosed conflicts of interest beyond mere scalping, including ownership interests in recommended securities, and the compensation connection between analysts and investment bankers within a firm. Part III of this article traces the history of prior cases imposing liability on industry participants, including investment advisers, analysts and others, for failing to disclose their conflicts of interest when recommending securities. Part IV of this article then examines the question of whether analysts have any civil liability to those relying on their recommendations for failure to disclose actual or potential conflicts of interest. Finally, the …
Law And Justice In The Twenty-First Century, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.
Law And Justice In The Twenty-First Century, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Ethical Tax Problems In Tax Practice, L. Paige Marvel, Paula M. Junghans
Ethical Tax Problems In Tax Practice, L. Paige Marvel, Paula M. Junghans
William & Mary Annual Tax Conference
No abstract provided.
From Buchanan To Button: Legal Ethics And The Naacp (Part Ii), Susan Carle
From Buchanan To Button: Legal Ethics And The Naacp (Part Ii), Susan Carle
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
The Prosecutor's Duty To Truth, Bennett L. Gershman
The Prosecutor's Duty To Truth, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Part I of this Article discusses the prosecutor's duty to refrain from conduct that impedes the search for truth. A prosecutor may impede the truth-finding process in several ways: (1) distorting the truth by attacking the defendant's character, misleading and misrepresenting facts, and engaging in inflammatory conduct; (2) subverting the truth by making false statements and presenting false evidence; (3) suppressing the truth by failing to disclose potentially truth-enhancing evidence or obstructing defense access to potentially truth-enhancing evidence; and (4) other truth-disserving conduct that exploits defense counsel's misconduct and mistakes and prevents introduction of potentially truth-serving defenses. Part I also …
Just Being A Lawyer: Reflections On The Legal Ethics Of A President Under Impeachment, John A. Humbach
Just Being A Lawyer: Reflections On The Legal Ethics Of A President Under Impeachment, John A. Humbach
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The core vice that Posner finds in Clinton’s efforts to contain the truth of the Lewinsky affair is very similar to a fault the public perceives in the behavior of lawyers generally. Namely, lawyers often try to obscure or distract from factual truth order to prevent the law from applying as intended. Most of this avoidance behavior is technically lawful because, for pragmatic reasons, allowances for such avoidance have been deliberately built into the criminal laws against perjury, obstruction of justice and the like. These allowances are a compromise that the law makes with morals so its criminal prohibitions will …
Current Issues In The Psychiatrist-Patient Relationship: Outpatient Civil Commitment, Psychiatric Abandonment And The Duty To Continue Treatment Of Potentially Dangerous Patients--Balancing Duties To Patients And The Public, Vanessa Merton, Linda C. Fentiman
Current Issues In The Psychiatrist-Patient Relationship: Outpatient Civil Commitment, Psychiatric Abandonment And The Duty To Continue Treatment Of Potentially Dangerous Patients--Balancing Duties To Patients And The Public, Vanessa Merton, Linda C. Fentiman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Abuse Of Confidentiality And Fabricated Controversy: Two Proposals, John A. Humbach
Abuse Of Confidentiality And Fabricated Controversy: Two Proposals, John A. Humbach
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
This article is framed as a discussion of two proposals for modifying the Model Rules. One would declare fabricated controversy to be out of bounds as a tactical tool. The other would expressly affirm that it is an abuse of confidentiality for lawyers to engage in strategies of partial-truth advocacy, to assert partial truths while deliberately holding back other information that the lawyer should know is needed in order not to mislead others. Both of these techniques, fabrication of controversy and partial-truth advocacy, tend to undercut the trial as a “search for truth” and both interfere with negotiations as a …