Law | Open Access Articles | Digital Commons Network™

Interstate Commerce Commission V. American Trucking Associations, Inc. Jan 1986

Interstate Commerce Commission V. American Trucking Associations, Inc.

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Motor Carrier Taxation, Hal H. Hale Oct 1958

Motor Carrier Taxation, Hal H. Hale

Vanderbilt Law Review

Provisions of the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956 vastly expanded the federal role in highway improvement on a long range basis, especially with respect to the so-called Interstate System. Authorizations of highway aid were further increased substantially by Congress in legislation enacted in 1958. The 1956 act for the first time also provided that the funds to pay for federal aid highway programs should come from specified levies upon highway users and a highway trust fund was established for this purpose. Owing principally to cost increases exceeding the original estimates, it has become apparent since the 1956 act was …

Go to article

Regulation Of Motor Carrier Securities, Eugene T. Liipfert, John L. Mechem Oct 1958

Regulation Of Motor Carrier Securities, Eugene T. Liipfert, John L. Mechem

Vanderbilt Law Review

The origins of the intercity trucking industry were humble. The development of the motor truck and of an intercity highway system which made its use in the transportation of freight practicable led many enterprising individuals to set themselves up as intercity truckers during the decade between 1925 and 1935. Capital requirements were minimal. The initial investment was frequently no more than the down payment on the motor vehicles employed. In the early stages of development, the typical motor carrier was a sole proprietorship, partnership or family-held corporation which relied for its financing on retained earnings of the business and hand-to-mouth …

Go to article

Judicial Review Of Orders Of The Interstate Commerce Commission Relating To Motor Carriers, Robert W. Ginnane, James A. Murray Oct 1958

Judicial Review Of Orders Of The Interstate Commerce Commission Relating To Motor Carriers, Robert W. Ginnane, James A. Murray

Vanderbilt Law Review

When, in 1935, Congress provided for federal regulation of inter-state motor transportation by the Interstate Commerce Commission,it made applicable to the Commission's regulatory orders with respect to motor carriers the same system of judicial review which it had devised for orders relating to railroads in the Urgent Deficiencies Act of 1913.' This invoked not only the naked statutory review provisions but also, at least by analogy, the mass of judicial decisions applying the 1913 legislation to Commission orders involving railroads. The statutory provisions for review of orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission have been codified into Title 28 of the …

Go to article

Some Aspects Of The Problem Of Intercarrier Competition, Ernest W. Williams Jr. Oct 1958

Some Aspects Of The Problem Of Intercarrier Competition, Ernest W. Williams Jr.

Vanderbilt Law Review

The past decade has been marked by numerous examinations of the transportation scene, and particularly of government policy toward transportation, which have borne partial fruit in the Transportation Act of 1958. More than anything else, the rapid weakening of the railroad system after World War II and the conviction of railroad managements that the worsening state of their industry was the result of "unfair" govenmental policies led to the almost continuous attention which has been devoted to the subject by agencies of the Congress and of the executive branch alike. And all such studies demonstrate, before they are done, that …

Go to article

Agency Problems In Motor Carrier Cases, Craig Spangenberg Jan 1957

Agency Problems In Motor Carrier Cases, Craig Spangenberg

Cleveland State Law Review

Some special considerations apply to the problems of agency in cases involving motor carriers. The questions here presented are viewed in the light of the operating practices which obtain in the industry. Relatively few tractor-trailer or truck trailer outfits are owned by the certified carrier. The equipment is usually owned by an individual, who may drive it himself as an owner-driver; or may hire his own driver and lease the equipment and driver together to the carrier. The lease may be for a single movement only, covering one trip from a stated origin to a stated terminal; or may be …

Go to article

Motor Carrier Litigation In The Supreme Court Since 1929, John J. George Jan 1934