Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
An Empirical Study Of Kent Style Juvenile Transfers To Criminal Court., Robert O. Dawson
An Empirical Study Of Kent Style Juvenile Transfers To Criminal Court., Robert O. Dawson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Kent v. United States was the first in a series of majority decisions by the United States Supreme Court which fixed constitutional minimum requirements for the juvenile justice system. This decision follows case law establishing the adjudication phase of the process: a right to notice of charges, to confrontation and cross-examination of witnesses, not to be compelled to incriminate oneself, and to counsel. Shortly afterwards, the Court established the constitutional requirement the government must prove its charges in juvenile court beyond a reasonable doubt. Finally, the Court determined the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution applies in the juvenile process. …
Section 1404(A), "Where It Might Have Been Brought": Brought By Whom?, Michael J. Waggoner
Section 1404(A), "Where It Might Have Been Brought": Brought By Whom?, Michael J. Waggoner
Publications
No abstract provided.
Transfer Of Federal Offenses Committed In More Than One District Or Division, Lester B. Orfield
Transfer Of Federal Offenses Committed In More Than One District Or Division, Lester B. Orfield
Michigan Law Review
Rule 21 (b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides: "The court upon motion of the defendant shall transfer the proceeding as to him to another district or division, if it appears from the indictment or information or from a bill of particulars that the offense was committed in more than one district or division and if the court is satisfied that in the interest of justice the proceeding should be transferred to another district or division in which the commission of the offense is charged."