Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Politics (5)
- Political Science (3)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (3)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
- American Politics (2)
-
- Arts and Humanities (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Leadership Studies (2)
- President/Executive Department (2)
- Applied Ethics (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- History (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Other Psychology (1)
- Personality and Social Contexts (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Political History (1)
- Political Theory (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 10 of 10
Full-Text Articles in Law
Private Lives Of Public Figures, Charlotte Miriam Albert
Private Lives Of Public Figures, Charlotte Miriam Albert
Senior Projects Fall 2019
Senior Project submitted to The Division of Social Studies of Bard College.
Starr, Singleton, And The Prosecutor's Role, David Sklansky
Starr, Singleton, And The Prosecutor's Role, David Sklansky
David A Sklansky
This article discusses the lessons contained in States v. Singleton and the system that has been adopted for investigating and prosecuting high executive officers. After describing Singleton and the tumult it triggered in Part I of this Article, Part II returns to the Starr Referral and poses a question that may at first seem idle: what distinguishes Starr's promises to Lewinsky in exchange for her testimony from the efforts he charges the President made to help find her a job? Part III of the Article broadens the focus. It argues there has been a general failure to think rigorously about …
Terms Of Endearment And Articles Of Impeachment, Charles W. Collier
Terms Of Endearment And Articles Of Impeachment, Charles W. Collier
Charles W. Collier
It is a long-established principle that presidential impeachment is an appropriate remedy only for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” of a public nature (with the possible exception of private crimes so heinous that the President “cannot be permitted to remain at large”). The crux of this Essay's argument is that the President's affair with Monica Lewinsky was a private matter that was not rendered “public” simply because Mr. Clinton lied about it. With its vote against removing the President, the Senate seemed to agree.
The Impeachment Trial Of President William Clinton, Douglas O. Linder
The Impeachment Trial Of President William Clinton, Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
In 1999, for only the second time in United States history, the Senate conducted an impeachment trial of a President. The acquittal of William Jefferson Clinton on February 12 came as no great surprise, given the near party-line vote on impeachment charges in the House of Representatives leading to the trial. The impeachment saga of President Clinton has its origins in a sexual harassment lawsuit brought in Arkansas in May, 1994 by Paula Jones, a former Arkansas state employee. Lawyers for Clinton argued that the Jones suit would distract him from the important tasks of his office and should not …
Terms Of Endearment And Articles Of Impeachment, Charles W. Collier
Terms Of Endearment And Articles Of Impeachment, Charles W. Collier
UF Law Faculty Publications
It is a long-established principle that presidential impeachment is an appropriate remedy only for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” of a public nature (with the possible exception of private crimes so heinous that the President “cannot be permitted to remain at large”). The crux of this Essay's argument is that the President's affair with Monica Lewinsky was a private matter that was not rendered “public” simply because Mr. Clinton lied about it. With its vote against removing the President, the Senate seemed to agree.
Starr, Singleton, And The Prosecutor's Role, David A. Sklansky
Starr, Singleton, And The Prosecutor's Role, David A. Sklansky
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article discusses the lessons contained in States v. Singleton and the system that has been adopted for investigating and prosecuting high executive officers. After describing Singleton and the tumult it triggered in Part I of this Article, Part II returns to the Starr Referral and poses a question that may at first seem idle: what distinguishes Starr's promises to Lewinsky in exchange for her testimony from the efforts he charges the President made to help find her a job? Part III of the Article broadens the focus. It argues there has been a general failure to think rigorously about …
Attorney-Client Privilege When The Client Is A Public Official: Litigating The Opening Act Of The Impeachment Drama, Timothy K. Armstrong
Attorney-Client Privilege When The Client Is A Public Official: Litigating The Opening Act Of The Impeachment Drama, Timothy K. Armstrong
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
The divided panel decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in /n re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 466 (1998), represented a dramatic shift in that court's thinking on the question whether the attorney-client privilege protects what a government official says to his agency's counsel in confidence. Although the court of appeals in at least four previous decisions had held that a government agency client holds the same privilege any other client would under like circumstances to communicate with counsel in private, the Lindsey court took a quite different view.
Trends. Clinton/Lewinsky, Star Chambers, The Starr Report: E Pluribus Unum Or E Uno Plures?, Ibpp Editor
Trends. Clinton/Lewinsky, Star Chambers, The Starr Report: E Pluribus Unum Or E Uno Plures?, Ibpp Editor
International Bulletin of Political Psychology
The author discusses the effect of lying on the presidency and impeachment.
The Clinton Chronicle: Diary Of A Political Psychologist, Aubrey Immelman
The Clinton Chronicle: Diary Of A Political Psychologist, Aubrey Immelman
Psychology Faculty Publications
Chronicle, from the perspective of political psychology, of events and controversies in the impeachment saga of President Bill Clinton, from the president’s August 17, 1998 testimony before the grand jury in the Starr investigation to his acquittal on February 12, 1999.
How Does Congress Define 'Perjury'?, Robert Blecker
How Does Congress Define 'Perjury'?, Robert Blecker
Other Publications
No abstract provided.