Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Communications Law (2)
- Computer Law (2)
- Privacy Law (2)
- Business (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
-
- Communication (1)
- Communication Technology and New Media (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- E-Commerce (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Family, Life Course, and Society (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Juvenile Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Marketing Law (1)
- Science and Technology Law (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Sociology (1)
- Institution
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Roundtable Discussion With Lawrence Lessig, David G. Post & Jeffrey Rosen, Thomas E. Baker
A Roundtable Discussion With Lawrence Lessig, David G. Post & Jeffrey Rosen, Thomas E. Baker
Faculty Publications
This article is a transcript of a discussion between Lawrence Lessig, David G. Post and Jeffrey Rosen on a variety of issues surrounding law, technology and the Internet. The moderator was Thomas E. Baker and the discussion was part of a Drake University Law School symposium in February of 2001.
Minor Distractions: Children, Privacy And E-Commerce, Anita L. Allen
Minor Distractions: Children, Privacy And E-Commerce, Anita L. Allen
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Internet Privacy And Self-Regulation: Lessons From The Porn Wars, Tom Bell
Internet Privacy And Self-Regulation: Lessons From The Porn Wars, Tom Bell
Tom W. Bell
The availability and adequacy of technical remedies ought to play a crucial role in evaluating the propriety of state action with regard to both the inhibition of Internet pornography and the promotion of Internet privacy. Legislation that would have restricted Internet speech considered indecent or harmful to minors has already faced and failed that test. Several prominent organizations dedicated to preserving civiI Iiberties argued successfully that self -help technologies offered less-restrictive means of achieving the purported ends of such legislation, rendering it unconstitutional. Surprisingly, those same organizations have of late joined the call for subjecting another kind of speech—speech by …