Law Commons^™

Jurisdiction And Nexus, John B. Harper

William & Mary Annual Tax Conference

No abstract provided.

Provincialism In United States Courts , Patrick M. Mcfadden

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Note: A Brief History Of Canadian Federal Court Jurisdiction, Herbert A. Johnson

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Federal Jurisdiction In Australian Courts: Policies And Prospects, Brian R. Opeskin

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Puzzle Of Jurisdiction, Richard C. Risk

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.

Power, Responsibility, And Republican Democracy, Marci A. Hamilton

Articles

No abstract provided.

Give Peace A Chance: Fcc-State Relations After California Iii, Jonathan Jacob Nadler

Federal Communications Law Journal

The Communications Act of 1934 established a dual regulatory scheme, whereby the FCC has authority over interstate telecommunications service, while the states retain authority over purely intrastate telecommunications. This has led to a "border war" between the FCC and the states over exactly where the dividing line between their respective regulatory spheres lies. They have also clashed over the scope of permissible FCC preemption of state regulatory authority when that authority conflicts with federal policies. After twenty years of conflict, however, three recent appellate decisions may have provided an opportunity to bring the conflict to an end by clarifying both …

Severing Venue And Personal Jurisdiction In Missouri, Joseph H. Knittig

Missouri Law Review

The concepts of venue and jurisdiction carry independent and severable meanings. "Venue" means the place where a case is to be tried, while "jurisdiction" speaks to the power of the court to hear and determine a case In Missouri, a "unique melding" of the concepts developed. A line of cases commingling venue and personal jurisdiction yielded strange and often unduly harsh results.' In State ex rel. DePaul Health Center v. Mummert,6 the Missouri Supreme Court attempted to sever venue and jurisdiction, and finally restore some common sense and predictability to sixty plus years of confusion.

D.M. Gray Co, Inc., V. Deroche D/B/A Starr Construction, 94-Ap-25 (Blkft. Tr. Ct. App., March 6, 1995), Blackfeet Appellate Court

Court Decisions

In the Blackfeet Tribal Court of Appeals the Court reversed and remanded case for improper service when service was improperly made to a minor. Ch. 9, Rule 12: Service of Process, states that service may be made “upon an individual other than a minor under the age of sixteen, or an incompetent person, by delivering a copy of the summons or notice of action, and give the complaint to him personally, or by leaving copies thereof where he lives with an adult living there, or by delivering a copy of the summons or notice of action and of the complaint …

Re Maritime Telegraph And Telephone Co And Ac & Twu, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

Preliminary award concerning arbitrability. Preliminary objection upheld in part.

Union grievance alleging breach of the collective agreement between the parties for the periods November 1 (plant workers), November 15 (operator services) and December 27 (clerical workers), 1992 to October 28, 1995, which counsel agreed was to govern this matter, in that the employer's voluntary separation offer effective May 31, 1994, was unfair and unreasonable and discrimi­nated on the basis of sex, contrary to arts. 2.1 and 4.3. Counsel for the employer made a preliminary objection to my jurisdiction to deal with the voluntary separation offer on either of those grounds.

Reporter’S Draft For The Working Group On Principles To Use When Considering The Federalization Of Civil Law, Erwin Chemerinsky

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Reporter’S Draft For The Working Group On Principles To Use When Considering The Federalization Of Criminal Law, Sara Sun Beale

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Too Many And Yet Too Few: New Principles To Define The Proper Limits For Federal Criminal Jurisdiction, Sara Sun Beale

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Busting The Hart & Wechsler Paradigm, Michael L. Wells

Scholarly Works

Federal Courts law was once a vibrant area of scholarship and an essential course for intellectually ambitious students. Now its prestige has diminished so much that scholars debate its future in a recent issue of the Vanderbilt Law Review, where even one of its champions calls it (albeit in the subjunctive mood) a “scholarly backwater.” What, if anything, went wrong, and what should Federal Courts scholars do about it? In his contribution to the Vanderbilt symposium, Richard Fallon defends the reigning model of Federal Courts law, an approach to jurisdictional issues that dates from the publication in 1953 of Henry …

Professor Lowenfeld Responds, Andreas F. Lowenfeld

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Professor Silberman is as usual gracious in acknowledging my writings in various formats, and my efforts to restore conflict of laws to its place as a branch of international law, a place it has occupied in most of the world outside the United States, and occupied here as well in the view of Story and others who wrote before the balkanization of American law in the latter part of the nineteenth century. We have no disagreements on the value of the comparative method in teaching conflict of laws, civil procedure, or international litigation.

This brief response is addressed only to …

Judicial Jurisdiction In The Conflict Of Laws Course: Adding A Comparative Dimension, Linda J. Silberman

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

In this Article, Professor Silberman suggests that comparative law materials can usefully be introduced in the conflict of laws course. She proposes the subject of adjudicatory jurisdiction as a good place to start. She argues that a comparison of the U.S. approach with the English and European approaches (particularly under the Brussels Convention) is evidence of the desirability of a jurisdictional system grounded more on rules and/or discretion rather than on a constitutional standard of reasonableness. She takes issue with the contention of her colleague Professor Andreas Lowenfeld that "reasonableness" has been accepted as an international standard for the assertion …

Two Cheers For Specialization, Jeffrey W. Stempel

Scholarly Works

Professor Dreyfuss adopts what might be termed the more conservative and deferential view of the efficacy of Delaware corporate law in her paper and her presentation. This approach generally views the market as making a statement with which one should not lightly quarrel. Because Delaware continues to attract incorporations, this view posits that the state's attraction is the superiority of its corporate law compared to other states, which lack a semi-specialized Chancery Court. Consequently, in a race to the top of corporate standards, legal rules and adjudications, Delaware's success in the market suggests that Delaware's legal product is good.

Other …

The Supreme Court's Land Use Decisions, Hon. Leon D. Lazer

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Power Of Courts

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

"Common Sense Legal Reform" And Bell's Toll: Eliminating Punitive Damage Claims From Jurisdictional Amount Calculations In Federal Diversity Cases, Russell G. Murphy

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Overflight Restrictions, J. Ashley Roach, Robert W. Smith

International Law Studies

No abstract provided.

Navigation In Exclusive Economic Zones, J. Ashley Roach, Robert W. Smith

International Law Studies

No abstract provided.

Identification Of Excessive Maritime Claims, J. Ashley Roach, Robert W. Smith

International Law Studies

No abstract provided.

Insuring Domestic Tranquility Through Quieter Products: A Proposed Product-Nuisance Tort, Jason A. Lief

Cardozo Law Review

Is there a place upon this globe where one may escape the drone of our industrial beehive and bask in calm tranquility? Thoreau observed that the "mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation." Paradoxically, the source of that quiet desperation often is uncontrollable environmental noise. Even within the ,home, the one supposed sanctuary from the world's evils, unwanted noise invades lives and disrupts serenity. Although noise is not a new problem for mankind, its magnitude has changed over time. Today's "speaking trumpets" do indeed "have a power unknown to a simpler age." Amplified sound can be a weapon, as …

Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, Virginia S. Albrecht

Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)

52 pages.

Contains footnotes.

Duncan Energy V. Three Affiliated Tribes (1994), United States Court Of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

US Government Documents Related to Indigenous Nations

This court case, decided on June 8, 1994, was the result of an appeal of an earlier decision made on September 28, 1992. This suit was initially filed by Duncan Energy (and others) who were operating oil and gas wells in the northeast quadrant of the Fort Berthold Reservation. They contended that the northeast quadrant of land was not part of the Reservation per the act of 1910 and as such they were not subject to taxation and employment ordinances set by the Three Affiliated Tribes. The 1992 ruling found that act of 1910 did not diminish the Reservation and …

Late Night Confessions In The Hart And Wechsler Hotel, Ann Althouse

Vanderbilt Law Review

I began my work in this field about a decade ago, as a teacher, quite simply, trying to find some coherence, some sense in the notoriously complex doctrine. Finding a scheme of coherence, a framework, really is the process of understanding. To merely observe that the field is chaotic, arcane, or incoherent is to decline the work of understanding. That rejection of the subject matter may be a fair and appropriate reaction: witness my colleagues who regard Federal Courts as a "mind game" or a "crossword puzzle." (Indeed, vast numbers bf laypersons have this reaction to the entire subject of …

The Straight-Line Method Of Determining Personal Jurisdiction, John M. Brumbaugh, William L. Reynolds

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

International Abductions, Low Intensity Conflicts, And State Sovereignty: A Moral Inquiry, Fernando R. Tesón

Scholarly Publications

What are the moral principles bearing on operations such as an international abduction? International abductions are part of a larger category of international acts referred to as "low-intensity" operations. Can these acts be morally justified in time of peace? Can one nation, for example, rightfully claim that abductions of persons who are suspected of horrendous crimes by agents of another country violate the first country's sovereignty? Does the interest of the other country in bringing such persons to trial outweigh that sovereignty claim? If not, what interest of the second country could possibly justify the abduction? In any case, are …

Alternative Penal Sanctions, Paul Marcus

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.