Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (1075)
- Courts (510)
- Constitutional Law (252)
- Jurisprudence (228)
- Legal Profession (175)
-
- Law and Society (158)
- Legal History (132)
- Criminal Law (131)
- Law and Politics (119)
- Criminal Procedure (112)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (104)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (98)
- Legal Education (89)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (88)
- Supreme Court of the United States (88)
- Litigation (83)
- Legislation (75)
- Legal Writing and Research (70)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (69)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (63)
- Administrative Law (62)
- Law and Gender (56)
- Civil Procedure (55)
- International Law (55)
- State and Local Government Law (52)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (50)
- Jurisdiction (50)
- Legal Biography (49)
- First Amendment (44)
- Institution
-
- SelectedWorks (453)
- Selected Works (244)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (87)
- BLR (79)
- William & Mary Law School (66)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (53)
- Fordham Law School (53)
- Roger Williams University (50)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (50)
- Duke Law (47)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (46)
- University of South Carolina (46)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (40)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (38)
- University of Colorado Law School (35)
- University of Richmond (34)
- Pepperdine University (32)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (30)
- University of Missouri School of Law (25)
- Pace University (23)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (22)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (21)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (20)
- West Virginia University (20)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (17)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (16)
- St. Mary's University (16)
- University of Baltimore Law (16)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (16)
- Louisiana State University Law Center (15)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (84)
- ExpressO (72)
- Faculty Publications (51)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (49)
- Cardozo Law Review (49)
-
- Indiana Law Journal (47)
- South Carolina Law Review (46)
- Scholarly Works (39)
- Touro Law Review (37)
- All Faculty Scholarship (36)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (35)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (35)
- Publications (31)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (28)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (27)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (25)
- William & Mary Law Review (25)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (21)
- Law Faculty Publications (21)
- West Virginia Law Review (20)
- Eric H Schepard (19)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (19)
- Laura K. Ray (18)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (18)
- John B McArthur (17)
- Fordham Law Review (16)
- University of Richmond Law Review (16)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (15)
- Louisiana Law Review (15)
- Pepperdine Law Review (15)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 2137
Full-Text Articles in Law
First Amendment And Media Law Diversity Moot Court Competition, Roger Williams University School Of Law, Michelle Choate
First Amendment And Media Law Diversity Moot Court Competition, Roger Williams University School Of Law, Michelle Choate
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
20th Annual Diversity Symposium Dinner 3-26-2024, Roger Williams University School Of Law
20th Annual Diversity Symposium Dinner 3-26-2024, Roger Williams University School Of Law
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
Problems With Authority, Amy J. Griffin
Problems With Authority, Amy J. Griffin
St. John's Law Review
(Excerpt)
Judicial decision-making rests on a foundation of unwritten rules—those that govern the weight of authority. Such rules, including the cornerstone principle of stare decisis, are created informally through the internal social practices of the judiciary. Because weight-of-authority rules are largely informal and almost entirely unwritten, we lack a comprehensive account of their content. This raises serious questions—sounding in due process and access to justice—about whether judicial decision-making rests ultimately on judges’ arbitrary and unexamined preferences rather than transparent and deliberative processes. These norms of authority are largely invisible to many, including parties appearing before the courts. They govern the …
Beyond The Borders: The Rise Of Judicial Corruption And Universal Jurisdiction, Rose Mahdavieh
Beyond The Borders: The Rise Of Judicial Corruption And Universal Jurisdiction, Rose Mahdavieh
University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review
No abstract provided.
Immoderate Moderation: Chief Justice Roberts's Concurrence In Dobbs, Thomas J. Molony
Immoderate Moderation: Chief Justice Roberts's Concurrence In Dobbs, Thomas J. Molony
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Chief Justice John Roberts attempted to chart a middle way in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. But there are times when you must choose a side. This was one of them.
The Chief Justice has been a consistent proponent of judicial restraint since he joined the United States Supreme Court in 2005. For him, one of the key characteristics of restraint is deciding no more than necessary to resolve a case. In Dobbs, he insisted that the Court did not need to overrule Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey in full to uphold Mississippi’s fifteen-week …
The Play’S The Thing: A Response To Judge Benjamin Beaton, Aaron J. Walayat
The Play’S The Thing: A Response To Judge Benjamin Beaton, Aaron J. Walayat
Pepperdine Law Review
In a recent speech, later published as an essay, the Hon. Benjamin Beaton of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky shared his critical suggestions against the use of the honorific “Your Honor,” preferring instead the more neutral title “judge.” Judge Beaton’s reason for this preference stems from a fear that the current practice of judicial titles emphasizes status over function, which may inflate the individual judge’s ego while miscommunicating to the public that judges make, rather than find, law. This position, however, is misguided. Judicial titles emphasize the authority of the law through the authority …
Problem-Solving Courts And The Outcome Oversight Gap, Erin R. Collins
Problem-Solving Courts And The Outcome Oversight Gap, Erin R. Collins
UMKC Law Review
The creation of a specialized, “problem-solving” court is a ubiquitous response to the issues that plague our criminal legal system. The courts promise to address the factors believed to lead to repeated interactions with the system, such as addiction or mental illness, thereby reducing recidivism and saving money. And they do so effectively – at least according to their many proponents, who celebrate them as an example of a successful “evidence-based,” data-driven reform. But the actual data on their efficacy is underwhelming, inconclusive, or altogether lacking. So why do they persist?
This Article seeks to answer that question by scrutinizing …
2024 Hines Jurist In Residence Lecture:, Carla Wong Mcmillian
2024 Hines Jurist In Residence Lecture:, Carla Wong Mcmillian
Edenfield & Hines Jurists in Residence
The Hines Jurist in Residence Lecture was delivered by Georgia Supreme Court Justice Carla Wong McMillian (J.D. 98) who discussed her path to the bench. Her talk was titled "From China to Augusta to the Supreme Court".
Law School News: Victorious Verdict 2-21-2024, Michelle Choate
Law School News: Victorious Verdict 2-21-2024, Michelle Choate
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Filling The Red State Federal Judicial Vacancies, Carl Tobias
Filling The Red State Federal Judicial Vacancies, Carl Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
District vacancies without nominees that plague red jurisdictions deserve emphasis in this Essay for several reasons. First, there are myriad district court jurists who trigger greater numbers of empty posts when they assume senior status, retire, or die, which triggers more issues. Legislators have created 677 active trial court positions, which dwarf the 179 active court of appeals judicial posts. The trial courts are tribunals of last resort for most cases; their numerous jurists are the only court members that many litigants encounter, and significantly more district court openings lack nominees. In contrast, appellate courts explicitly articulate considerable policy, include …
Rethinking Antebellum Bankruptcy, Rafael I. Pardo
Rethinking Antebellum Bankruptcy, Rafael I. Pardo
University of Colorado Law Review
Bankruptcy law has been repeatedly reinvented over time in response to changing circumstances. The Bankruptcy Act of 1841—passed by Congress to address the financial ruin caused by the Panic of 1837—constituted a revolutionary break from its immediate predecessor, the Bankruptcy Act of 1800, which was the nation’s first bankruptcy statute. Although Congress repealed the 1841 Act in 1843, the legislation lasted significantly longer than recognized by scholars. The repeal legislation permitted pending bankruptcy cases to be finally resolved pursuant to the Act’s terms. Because debtors flooded the judicially understaffed 1841 Act system with over 46,000 cases, the Act’s administration continued …
Judges As Lawyers, Deirdre M. Smith
Judges As Lawyers, Deirdre M. Smith
Faculty Publications
The integrity of the American legal system and, thereby, of our democracy rests on the shoulders of the judiciary. It is widely understood that the roles of jurist and advocate are incompatible and that the fairness and legitimacy of our court systems require maintaining clear boundaries between those roles. Accordingly, an essential feature of every state’s judicial conduct code is a prohibition on the practice of law by judges. However, many states have carved out exceptions to this prohibition to allow part-time judges sitting in low-level trial courts to supplement their modest judicial compensation by practicing law. The rationale for …
Can Judges Help Ease Mass Incarceration?, Jeffrey Bellin
Can Judges Help Ease Mass Incarceration?, Jeffrey Bellin
Faculty Publications
A scholar considers how judges have contributed to historically high incarceration rates -- and how they can help reverse the trend.
Learning To Disagree Agreeably, Allison Orr Larsen
Learning To Disagree Agreeably, Allison Orr Larsen
Faculty Publications
But the most important lesson I learned from Judge Wilkinson—out of many important lessons—is the one brought home to me by witnessing his friendship with Judge Michael: the law works only when lawyers learn to “disagree agreeably.” This is a phrase the Judge taught me—and he always attributed to people from whom he learned it—but for me it encapsulates the Judge in every way. It is easy to talk about being collegial in the abstract, but Judge Wilkinson practices what he preaches.
In this brief Essay, on the occasion of celebrating a man who shaped my career and life in …
Rethinking Antebellum Bankruptcy, Rafael I. Pardo
Rethinking Antebellum Bankruptcy, Rafael I. Pardo
Scholarship@WashULaw
Bankruptcy law has been repeatedly reinvented over time in response to changing circumstances. The Bankruptcy Act of 1841—passed by Congress to address the financial ruin caused by the Panic of 1837—constituted a revolutionary break from its immediate predecessor, the Bankruptcy Act of 1800, which was the nation’s first bankruptcy statute. Although Congress repealed the 1841 Act in 1843, the legislation lasted significantly longer than recognized by scholars. The repeal legislation permitted pending bankruptcy cases to be finally resolved pursuant to the Act’s terms. Because debtors flooded the judicially understaffed 1841 Act system with over 46,000 cases, the Act’s administration continued …
Self-Defense And Political Rage, Erin L. Sheley
Self-Defense And Political Rage, Erin L. Sheley
Faculty Scholarship
This Article considers how American political polarization and the substantive issues driving it raise unique challenges for adjudicating self-defense claims in contexts of political protest. We live in an age where roughly a quarter of the population believes it is at least sometimes justifiable to use violence in defense of political positions, making political partisans somewhat more likely to pose a genuine threat of bodily harm to opponents. Furthermore, the psychological literature shows that people are more likely to perceive threats from people with whom they politically disagree and that juries tend to evaluate reasonableness claims according to their own …
The Stories We (Don’T) Tell: Using Case Briefing To Explore Bias And Oppression In The Law, Ashley B. Armstrong
The Stories We (Don’T) Tell: Using Case Briefing To Explore Bias And Oppression In The Law, Ashley B. Armstrong
Faculty Publications
Traditional case briefing focuses on the text of the opinion—how courts frame and resolve legal issues. This Essay explores how to teach case briefing to investigate bias and oppression in the law. By discussing socio-historical context during class or assigning reimagined judicial opinions alongside the original opinion, teaching case briefing this way asks students to consider the stories that judges don’t tell (and why). This Essay proffers two examples that illustrate these approaches: United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973) and Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co., 350 F.2d 445 (1965).
In Memoriam: Honorable Ruth Thelma Cooper Breslauer Burg (1926-2023), Judge Reba Page, Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams, John S. Pachter, Steven L. Schooner
In Memoriam: Honorable Ruth Thelma Cooper Breslauer Burg (1926-2023), Judge Reba Page, Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams, John S. Pachter, Steven L. Schooner
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
This collection of short pieces celebrate the extraordinary life of Judge Ruth Thelma Cooper Breslauer Burg (1926-2023). As Judge Page reflects: "Those of us privileged to know her held Judge Burg in awe, and she remains a personal and professional inspiration. Judge Burg is celebrated for many reasons: her exceptional intellect; her professional accomplishments as a judge, lawyer, and mediator; her dedication to her Jewish faith; and her deep allegiance to her family and friends." Judge Williams explains that "a few luminaries in the ABA Section of Public Contract Law ... epitomize the Section’s attributes—commitment to excellence in the law, …
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.'S Teleological Jurisprudence And What It Means For Constitutional Interpretation Today, Susan D. Carle
Justice William J. Brennan Jr.'S Teleological Jurisprudence And What It Means For Constitutional Interpretation Today, Susan D. Carle
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
Observers commonly think of the Warren and Roberts Courts as polar opposites in their modes of constitutional interpretation. But how different are their approaches really? To be sure, the values that underlie the jurisprudence of the Warren and Roberts Courts are dramatically different, but their methodologies for constitutional adjudication are similar in a crucial respect: both Courts frequently employ a teleological approach. They look, in other words, to ends outside of the law to determine the direction in which constitutional law should be heading.
To prove this point, this Article examines the methods and values Justice William J. Brennan Jr. …
Do Judges Understand Technology? How Attorneys And Advocates View Judicial Responsibility In Cyberstalking And Cyberharassment Cases, Kateryna Kaplun
Do Judges Understand Technology? How Attorneys And Advocates View Judicial Responsibility In Cyberstalking And Cyberharassment Cases, Kateryna Kaplun
International Journal on Responsibility
As new technologies emerge and are increasingly used to commit interpersonal cybercrimes like cyberstalking and cyberharassment, the legal system lags in assisting victims in obtaining justice in these types of experiences. This qualitative research study explores how attorney and advocate interviewees from Illinois, New Jersey, and New York view judges’ responsibility to the law in cyberstalking and cyberharassment cases. This study finds three themes: judges’ lack of understanding of technology and its harms, discretion, and law on the books versus law in action as important factors and frameworks that contribute to why judges do not consider the importance of technology …
Sentencing In An Era Of Plea Bargains, Jeffrey Bellin, Jenia I. Turner
Sentencing In An Era Of Plea Bargains, Jeffrey Bellin, Jenia I. Turner
Faculty Publications
The literature offers inconsistent answers to a question that is foundational to criminal law: Who imposes sentences? Traditional narratives place sentencing responsibility in the hands of the judge. Yet, in a country where 95% of criminal convictions come from guilty pleas (not trials), modern American scholars center prosecutors—who control plea terms—as the deciders of punishment. This Article highlights and seeks to resolve the tension between these conflicting narratives by charting the pathways by which sentences are determined in a system dominated by plea bargains.
After reviewing the empirical literature on sentence variation, examining state and federal plea-bargaining rules and doctrines, …
To Write Or Not To Write: The Ethics Of Judicial Writings And Publishing, Nick Badgerow, Michael Hoeflich, Sarah Schmitz
To Write Or Not To Write: The Ethics Of Judicial Writings And Publishing, Nick Badgerow, Michael Hoeflich, Sarah Schmitz
St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics
Judges are bound by the Model Code of Judicial Conduct promulgated by the American Bar Association and adopted most states, including the federal judiciary. Within these rules governing judicial conduct, Judges owe duties to the public and to their calling, to be (and appear to be) objective, fair, judicious, and independent. When judges venture into the realm of extrajudicial writing—in the form of fiction novels, short stories, legal books, children’s books, and the like—they must consider the ethical bounds of that expression. The Model Code of Judicial Conduct imposes five main constraints upon extrajudicial writings: (a) a judge may not …
2023 Women In Robes, Roger Williams University School Of Law
2023 Women In Robes, Roger Williams University School Of Law
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
Disparities On Judicial Conduct Commissions, Nino C. Monea
Disparities On Judicial Conduct Commissions, Nino C. Monea
Marquette Law Review
Every state has a judicial conduct commission responsible for investigating complaints against judges and issuing sanctions where appropriate. But the judicial disciplinary system needs fixing. This Article examines 466 cases of public discipline from five states to illustrate the shortcomings of the present system. The status quo hides judicial misconduct from the public, fails to punish judges who abuse their office, and gives judges greater protections than criminal defendants, even when the stakes are lower.
Texans Shortlisted For The U.S. Supreme Court: Why Did Lightning Only Strike Once?, The Honorable John G. Browning
Texans Shortlisted For The U.S. Supreme Court: Why Did Lightning Only Strike Once?, The Honorable John G. Browning
St. Mary's Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Plaintiffs' Process: Civil Procedure, Mdl, And A Day In Court, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, Abbe R. Gluck
Plaintiffs' Process: Civil Procedure, Mdl, And A Day In Court, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, Abbe R. Gluck
Scholarly Works
The article focuses on the concept of "plaintiffs process" within the field of civil procedure. It discusses how civil procedure doctrine has traditionally been defendant-centric, focusing on the rights and protections of defendants in legal cases. It examines the role of multidistrict litigation (MDL) in this context and how it impacts plaintiffs rights and access to the courts.
Where To Place The “Nones” In The Church And State Debate? Empirical Evidence From Establishment Clause Cases In Federal Court, Gregory C. Sisk, Michael Heise
Where To Place The “Nones” In The Church And State Debate? Empirical Evidence From Establishment Clause Cases In Federal Court, Gregory C. Sisk, Michael Heise
St. John's Law Review
In this third iteration of our ongoing empirical examination of religious liberty decisions in the lower federal courts, we studied all digested Establishment Clause decisions by federal circuit and district court judges from 2006 through 2015. The first clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution directs that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” That provision has generated decades of controversy regarding the appropriate role of religion in public life.
Holding key variables constant, we found that Catholic judges approved Establishment Clause claims at a 29.6% rate, compared with a 41.5% rate before non-Catholic …
The Divine Right Of Judges: How Christian Thought Shaped The American Judiciary, Elise Mclaren Villers
The Divine Right Of Judges: How Christian Thought Shaped The American Judiciary, Elise Mclaren Villers
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Essay continues a discussion on the authority of courts, executives, and legislators to govern nations where the law diverges from necessity or morality. In a previous Comment, P. Elise McLaren, Answering the Call: A History of the Emergency Power Doctrine in Texas and United States, 53 St. Mary’s L.J. 287 (2022), I asked whether necessity or emergency ever supersedes the law, i.e., whether “emergency powers” exist. In this Essay, I ask whether the government is held accountable to a force other than the people themselves, namely, religious influence. As was done with respect to emergency powers, I ask …
Fifty Years Of Canadian Legal History, Jim Phillips, Philip Girard
Fifty Years Of Canadian Legal History, Jim Phillips, Philip Girard
Dalhousie Law Journal
Fifty years ago Canadian legal history was very much in its infancy. What little had been published was in equal measure antiquarian, descriptive, and hagiographic. The field has undergone a profound transformation in the last half-century. We now know a great deal more about all aspects of our legal past, about our institutions, our legal personnel, and the substantive law. The field has also become much more sophisticated, concerned not only with internal legal developments but increasingly with the relationships between law and other aspects of Canadian history. Social history, labour history, women’s history, economic, intellectual, cultural and political history, …
Promoting Women’S Advancement In The Judiciary In The Midst Of Backlash: A Comparative Analysis Of Representation And Jurisprudence In Key Domestic And International Fora, Shruti Rana
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
Women’s advancement in the judiciary of the United States has been slow and uneven, and has long lagged behind other nations. Parity in representation remains distant, and the gains to date vulnerable to changes in administrations and fluctuating levels of state commitment to gender equality, with the recent global backlash to gender equality and international norms and institutions providing a critical example of this fragility. In this light, this Article argues that gender parity in the judiciary should not be viewed as merely a laudable goal. Rather, representation and parity should be viewed as fundamental state legal obligations under international …