Law Commons^™

Off His Rocker: Sports Discipline And Labor Arbitration, Roger I. Abrams

Marquette Sports Law Review

No abstract provided.

John Rocker And Employee Discipline For Speech, Lewis Kurlantzick

Marquette Sports Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Dancing Around The First Amendment: The Constitutionality Of Distance Requirements In Colacurcio V. City Of Kent, Jenna Doviak

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal

No abstract provided.

National Endowment Of The Arts V. Finley: The Propriety Of Viewpoint In Arts Funding Still Unknown, Melissa S. Vignovic

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Antidiscrimination Laws & Artistic Expression, Steven H. Shiffrin, Gregory R. Smith

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Rice V. Paladin Enterprises, Inc.: Does The First Amendment Protect Instruction Manuals On How To Commit Murder, Emma Dailey

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Bery V. New York: Do Artists Have A First Amendment Right To Sell And Display Art In Public Places, Christina A. Mathes

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal

No abstract provided.

American Library Association V. Reno: Protecting Producers Against Infringement Or Children Against Vulnerability - First Amendment Issues Surrounding Child Pornography Laws, Lisa L. Eckl

Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Moral Rights And The First Amendment: Putting Honor Before Free Speech?, Kathryn A. Kelly

University of Miami Entertainment & Sports Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Constitutionality Of Current Crime Victimization Statutes: A Survey , Debra A. Shields

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Girls Lean Back Everywhere: The Law Of Obscenity And The Assault On Genius, Anne E. Gilson

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Girls Lean Back Everywhere: The Law of Obscenity and the Assault on Genius by Edward de Grazia

1991 Legislation, Reports And Debates Over Federally Funded Art: Arts Community Left With An "Indecent" Compromise

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Midwest Video Crop. V. Fcc: The First Amendment Implications Of Cable Television Access, John K. Silk

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Sports Anti-Siphoning Rules For Pay Cable Television: A Public Right To Free Tv?, M. Agnes Siedlecki

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Censorship Of Violent Motion Pictures: A Constitutional Analysis, Mary B. Cook

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Drug Songs And The Federal Communications Commission, Sammuel Bufford

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

A "public notice" concerning the broadcasting of drug-related popular songs by radio stations issued from the Federal Communications Commission on March 5, 1971. While this notice could be generally taken to prohibit the playing of such songs, its actual message, upon further analysis, is more complex and less direct. This article will examine the notice to ascertain its likely meaning, determine its legal status, and examine three constitutional issues it raises: whether the songs are protected as speech under the first amendment; whether the statement of the prohibition (if that be the import of the notice) is sufficiently precise to …

Constitutional Law--Obscenity--The Right To An Adversary Hearing On The Issue Of Obscenity Prior To The Seizure Of Furtively Distributed Films, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

This Note will discuss the procedural safeguards that must be provided when allegedly obscene materials are seized prior to distribution. The discussion will emphasize a consideration of the question whether the procedural requirements with respect to the seizure of printed materials are also applicable to the seizure of films, particularly those films that are being or are intended to be furtively distributed.

Constitutional Law--Freedom Of Speech--Desecration Of National Symbols As Protected Political Expression, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Protest groups have long recognized the publicity value of engaging in dramatic kinds of symbolic behavior to express their disapproval of government policy, and recently they have resorted to the desecration of traditionally "sacred" symbols to achieve this end. Recourse to conduct offensive to the patriotic and religious sensibilities of large segments of the population seems to have paralleled the advent of widespread civil disobedience as an instrument of political persuasion. Specifically, dissent over the Vietnam war has produced a number of incidents involving public disrespect for the American flag. Thus, a need has arisen to analyze the extent to …

Carmen: Movies, Censorship And The Law, Abner J. Mikva

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Movies, Censorship and the Law by Ira H. Carmen

Constitutional Law - Due Process - Validity Of Refusal To Permit The Showing Of A Motion Picture On The Grounds Of Obscenity, Donald F. Oosterhouse S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

A Chicago municipal ordinance made it unlawful to exhibit any motion picture without first having secured a permit from the Commissioner of Police. The commissioner is required to issue the permit unless he finds the picture "immoral or obscene. . .. " On these grounds he refused to permit exhibition of "The Miracle." Plaintiffs brought suit to have the ordinance declared unconstitutional and to restrain enforcement of the prohibition on the picture. The trial court granted the relief asked. On appeal, held, reversed and remanded to determine if the motion picture is obscene. A prior restraint on the exhibition …