Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (12)
- Health Law and Policy (8)
- Education Law (5)
- State and Local Government Law (5)
- Administrative Law (3)
-
- Courts (2)
- Election Law (2)
- Property Law and Real Estate (2)
- Retirement Security Law (2)
- Securities Law (2)
- Torts (2)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- International Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Land Use Law (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Litigation (1)
- President/Executive Department (1)
- Tax Law (1)
- Taxation-State and Local (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 36 of 36
Full-Text Articles in Law
Comments On Professor Rotunda's Essay, Richard H. Underwood
Comments On Professor Rotunda's Essay, Richard H. Underwood
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
In this comment, Professor Richard H. Underwood provides a response to An Essay on the Constitutional Parameters of Federal Impeachment, by Professor Ronald D. Rotunda. Rotunda’s essay was published in the Kentucky Law Journal, Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 707-732.
Cigarette Company Liability: Preemption, Public Policy And Alternative Compensation Systems, Richard C. Ausness
Cigarette Company Liability: Preemption, Public Policy And Alternative Compensation Systems, Richard C. Ausness
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This Article speculates that some courts may have used the preemption doctrine to mask their misgivings about the ability of tort litigation to provide fair compensation to injured consumers without bankrupting the tobacco industry. Consequently, the author suggests that it may be necessary to streamline the litigation process for mass torts or perhaps even to replace it with an alternative compensation system for the purpose of adjudicating smoking-related claims.
With this in mind, Part I briefly examines the health risks of smoking and the nature of the common law duty to warn. It also reviews a number of recent cigarette …
Separation Of Powers, Legislative Vetoes, And The Public Lands, Eugene R. Gaetke
Separation Of Powers, Legislative Vetoes, And The Public Lands, Eugene R. Gaetke
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
The Supreme Court's decision in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha struck a serious, if not fatal, blow to the constitutional acceptability of the legislative veto. In Chadha the Court held that a provision of the Immigration and Naturalization Act, which permitted one House of Congress to reverse a decision by the Attorney
General not to deport an alien, was a violation of the doctrine of separation of powers since it did not comply with the requirements of passage by both Houses of Congress and presentment to the President. In light of that decision, the constitutionality of nearly 200 statutes …
Congressional Discretion Under The Property Clause, Eugene R. Gaetke
Congressional Discretion Under The Property Clause, Eugene R. Gaetke
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
The property clause of article IV grants Congress the authority to regulate federal lands. In referring to that authority, the Supreme Court has observed that “the power over the public land thus entrusted to Congress is without limitations.”
The simplicity of the Court's statement is appealing. Its implications, however, are troubling, especially for those states in which a substantial amount of federal property exists. If the property clause power of Congress is "without limitations," the power of some states over a considerable portion of the land within their boundaries is severely limited. For those states, an unlimited property clause power …
Applying The International Law Of Sovereign Immunity To The States Of The Union, John M. Rogers
Applying The International Law Of Sovereign Immunity To The States Of The Union, John M. Rogers
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
A state of the Union may preserve its immunity from suit in its own courts, and the Constitution restricts its amenability to suit in the federal courts. Yet in Nevada v. Hall the Supreme Court held that in a motor-vehicle accident case a state cannot claim a constitutional immunity from suit in the courts of a sister state. The Court indicated, however, that if a suit involved a defendant state's “capacity to fulfill its own sovereign responsibilities,” different constitutional considerations might control. In vigorous dissents Justices Blackmun and Rehnquist argued that the reasoning of the majority precluded even this possibility. …
More On The New Federalism In Criminal Procedure, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
More On The New Federalism In Criminal Procedure, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.