Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Evidence law

Discipline
Institution
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 31 - 55 of 55

Full-Text Articles in Law

Trances, Trials, And Tribulations, Gary M. Shaw Jan 1994

Trances, Trials, And Tribulations, Gary M. Shaw

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Brief Look At New York's Efforts To Codify Its Law Of Evidence, Barbara C. Salken Jan 1994

A Brief Look At New York's Efforts To Codify Its Law Of Evidence, Barbara C. Salken

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Coconspirator Statements And Former Testimony In New York And Federal Courts With Some Comments On Codification, Randolph N. Jonakait Jan 1994

Coconspirator Statements And Former Testimony In New York And Federal Courts With Some Comments On Codification, Randolph N. Jonakait

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Introduction Of Scientific Evidence In Criminal Cases, H. Patrick Furman Jan 1993

Introduction Of Scientific Evidence In Criminal Cases, H. Patrick Furman

Publications

No abstract provided.


Insuring Reliable Fact Finding In Guidelines Sentencing: Why Not Real Evidence Rules, Randolph N. Jonakait Jan 1993

Insuring Reliable Fact Finding In Guidelines Sentencing: Why Not Real Evidence Rules, Randolph N. Jonakait

Articles & Chapters

No abstract provided.


Meta-Evidence: Do We Need It?, Christopher B. Mueller Jan 1992

Meta-Evidence: Do We Need It?, Christopher B. Mueller

Publications

No abstract provided.


Post-Modern Hearsay Reform: The Importance Of Complexity, Christopher B. Mueller Jan 1992

Post-Modern Hearsay Reform: The Importance Of Complexity, Christopher B. Mueller

Publications

No abstract provided.


The Law Of Evidence And The Idea Of Progress, Michael S. Ariens Jan 1992

The Law Of Evidence And The Idea Of Progress, Michael S. Ariens

Faculty Articles

To ask the question, “Does evidence law matter?,” is often to assume that some sets or groups of people believe it is important while others are challenging that view. However, another assumption regarding the nature of this question is possible—that the question is asked because legal academics believe that evidence law both does and does not matter, and that those academics also believe that these are irreconcilable beliefs. What is of particular interest is how legal academics reached this point and why they believe that evidence law both does and does not matter.

Consideration of these aspects of evidence law …


Some Caveats Concerning Dna As Criminal Identification Evidence: With Thanks To The Reverend Bayes, Richard O. Lempert Nov 1991

Some Caveats Concerning Dna As Criminal Identification Evidence: With Thanks To The Reverend Bayes, Richard O. Lempert

Articles

The conference panel at which this paper was originally presented was structured along the lines of a debate. The three speakers who were supposed to advocate the use of DNA evidence were labeled, as is customary, Proponents. But those who were supposed to take the negative side were not called Opponents. Rather they were labeled Caveators. I do not know who is responsible for this label, but I think it gets things exactly right. To my mind anyone considering DNA as criminal identification evidence should be a Caveator. The promise and utility of DNA analysis in identifying the perpetrators of …


John Appleton: Through His Own Words, William W. Wells Jun 1991

John Appleton: Through His Own Words, William W. Wells

Maine History

This article contains a brief discussion of the legal importance of Judge Appleton and then quotes the text of a letter written by judge which provides insight into his personal qualities.


Prior Inconsistent Statements, H. Patrick Furman Jan 1988

Prior Inconsistent Statements, H. Patrick Furman

Publications

No abstract provided.


The New Evidence Scholarship: Analyzing The Process Of Proof, Richard O. Lempert May 1986

The New Evidence Scholarship: Analyzing The Process Of Proof, Richard O. Lempert

Articles

When I began teaching evidence seventeen years ago, the field was moribund. The great systematizers of the common law-Wigmore, Maguire, McCormick, Morgan and their ilk-had come and, if they had not all already gone, their work was largely finished. Not only was most of what passed for evidence scholarship barely worth the reading-the same, after all, could be said of many fields of law at most times-but disregarding student work, few scholars were writing regularly on evidentiary matters.


Historical Truth, Narrative Truth, And Expert Testimony, Marianne Wesson Jan 1985

Historical Truth, Narrative Truth, And Expert Testimony, Marianne Wesson

Publications

No abstract provided.


The Federal Coconspirator Exception: Action, Assertion, And Hearsay, Christopher B. Mueller Jan 1984

The Federal Coconspirator Exception: Action, Assertion, And Hearsay, Christopher B. Mueller

Publications

No abstract provided.


Assaults On The Exclusionary Rule: Good Faith Limitations And Damage Remedies, Pierre J. Schlag Jan 1982

Assaults On The Exclusionary Rule: Good Faith Limitations And Damage Remedies, Pierre J. Schlag

Publications

No abstract provided.


Jurors' Impeachment Of Verdicts And Indictments In Federal Court Under Rule 606(B), Christopher B. Mueller Jan 1978

Jurors' Impeachment Of Verdicts And Indictments In Federal Court Under Rule 606(B), Christopher B. Mueller

Publications

No abstract provided.


Prior Consistent Statements, Arthur H. Travers Jr. Jan 1978

Prior Consistent Statements, Arthur H. Travers Jr.

Publications

No abstract provided.


Instructing The Jury Upon Presumptions In Civil Cases: Comparing Federal Rule 301 With Uniform Rule 301, Christopher B. Mueller Jan 1977

Instructing The Jury Upon Presumptions In Civil Cases: Comparing Federal Rule 301 With Uniform Rule 301, Christopher B. Mueller

Publications

No abstract provided.


An Essay On The Determination Of Relevancy Under The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Arthur H. Travers Jr. Jan 1977

An Essay On The Determination Of Relevancy Under The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Arthur H. Travers Jr.

Publications

The scope of the general definition of "relevant evidence" in the Federal Rules of Evidence is ambiguous. It is unclear whether Congress, for instance, intended that certain issues be considered legislatively determined or that those issues rest within the discretion of the courts. There is also some uncertainty over the definition's applicability to several types of evidence--particularly undisputed facts such as those that provide background information or are judicially admitted.


Privileges In The Law Of Evidence: The Realities Of Attorney-Client Confidences, Robert Allen Sedler, Joseph J. Simeone Jan 1963

Privileges In The Law Of Evidence: The Realities Of Attorney-Client Confidences, Robert Allen Sedler, Joseph J. Simeone

Law Faculty Research Publications

No abstract provided.


The Evidentiary Effect Of A View--Another Word, Thomas P. Hardman Dec 1955

The Evidentiary Effect Of A View--Another Word, Thomas P. Hardman

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Developments In The Law Of Coerced Confessions, Howard Klemme Jan 1954

Developments In The Law Of Coerced Confessions, Howard Klemme

Publications

No abstract provided.


Current Decision, Right To Inspect Memoranda Used To Revive Recollection, Howard Klemme Jan 1953

Current Decision, Right To Inspect Memoranda Used To Revive Recollection, Howard Klemme

Publications

No abstract provided.


Current Decision, Weight And Admissibility Of Chemical Tests As Evidence Of Intoxication, Howard Klemme Jan 1953

Current Decision, Weight And Admissibility Of Chemical Tests As Evidence Of Intoxication, Howard Klemme

Publications

No abstract provided.


Current Decision, Due Process--Use Of Blood Tests To Determine Intoxication Not Violative Of Due Process, Howard Klemme Jan 1953

Current Decision, Due Process--Use Of Blood Tests To Determine Intoxication Not Violative Of Due Process, Howard Klemme

Publications

No abstract provided.