Law Commons^™

Trademark And Copyright: How Intimate Should The Close Association Become, Lee B. Burgunder

Santa Clara Law Review

No abstract provided.

An Inquiry Into The Merits Of Copyright: The Challenges Of Consistency, Consent And Encouragement Theory, Wendy J. Gordon

Faculty Scholarship

Hostility to copyright has a long and honorable history. In the nineteenth century, for example, Lord Macaulay argued that while copyright might be necessary to ensure a "supply of good books," the monopoly that it imposed was at best a necessary evil.

"For the sake of the good we must submit to the evil; but the evil ought
not to last a day longer than is necessary for the purpose of securing the good."

A number of studies critical of intellectual property followed in our century. The most well known is probably the economically oriented 1970 study by Stephen Breyer …

A Garland Of Reflections On Three International Copyright Topics, Peter Jaszi

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

The United States is a party to many copyright treaties, including a network of bilateral arrangements with other countries and one regional agreement. I will concentrate on the two major multilateral agreements to which the United States is a party, the Universal Copyright Convention ("UCC") and the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works ("Berne Convention").

The Copyright Doctrine Of 'Works Made For Hire', I. Trotter Hardy

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Protecting The Look And Feel Of Computer Programs, Jeffrey Weitzman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Enforceability Of State Shrink-Wrap License Statutes In Light Of Vault Corp V. Quaid Software Ltd., Page M. Kaufman

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Distilling The Witches' Brew Of Fair Use In Copyright Law, Jay Dratler Jr.

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Three Strikes And They're Out At The Old Ball Game: Preemption Of Performers' Rights Of Publicity Under The Copyright Act Of 1976, David E. Shipley

Scholarly Works

Presently, broadcasters and cable television companies deal directly with the two baseball leagues and the individual clubs, which in turn purport to sell all of the rights regarding the televising of the games. The players wanted to be a part of those contracts to get a bigger share of the television revenues. In the Baltimore Orioles case both sides sought a judicial resolution of their rights in the telecasts. The baseball players' demand was based on their rights of publicity in their performances. This common law right allegedly precluded the clubs and the leagues from contracting with the broadcasters for …

Imperfect Property: Defective Protection For Bona Fide Purchasers Of Copyrights, Brenda J. Saunders

University of Miami Entertainment & Sports Law Review

No abstract provided.

Copyright Law's Concept Of Employment -- What Congress Really Intended, I. Trotter Hardy

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

A Thousand Clones: The Scope Of Copyright Protection In The "Look And Feel" Of Computer Programs—Digital Communications Associates, Inc. V. Softklone Distributing Corp., 659 F. Supp. 449 (N.D. Ga. 1987), Alan S. Middleton

Washington Law Review

In Digital Communications Associates, Inc. v. Softklone Distributing Corp., the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia rejected "standardization" as a reason to deny copyright protection to user interface design. The court also rejected the proposition, advanced six months earlier in Broderbund Software, Inc. v. Unison World, Inc., that copyright protection of the underlying computer program extends to the screen displays generated by that program. Once it found the screen displays to be separately copyrightable, the Softklone court evaluated each feature of the display individually, and extended copyright protection to some elements of the user …

A Thousand Clones: The Scope Of Copyright Protection In The "Look And Feel" Of Computer Programs—Digital Communications Associates, Inc. V. Softklone Distributing Corp., 659 F. Supp. 449 (N.D. Ga. 1987), Alan S. Middleton

Washington Law Review

In Digital Communications Associates, Inc. v. Softklone Distributing Corp., the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia rejected "standardization" as a reason to deny copyright protection to user interface design. The court also rejected the proposition, advanced six months earlier in Broderbund Software, Inc. v. Unison World, Inc., that copyright protection of the underlying computer program extends to the screen displays generated by that program. Once it found the screen displays to be separately copyrightable, the Softklone court evaluated each feature of the display individually, and extended copyright protection to some elements of the user interface. Although …

Redefining The Limits Of Copyright Law After Nec V.Intel, Rebecca A. Speer

Santa Clara Law Review

No abstract provided.

Intellectual Property Rights And The Gatt: United States Goals In The Uruguay Round, Mark L. Damschroder

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

The pursuit of protection of IP rights is a valuable goal both for the United States and the rest of the world community. Such rights promote creativity and the advancement of knowledge, as well as fuel the domestic economy and improve the position of the United States vis-a-vis the other trading nations of the world. With the growing interdependence of the global economy, there is no time like the present to lay the foundation for a system of dispute settlement of such trade matters. Economic interdependence will continue to increase, and the problems of international trade in, and piracy of, …

Who Cares Who Wrote "Shakespeare"?, Peter Jaszi

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

Obviously, a great many people, on both (or all) sides of the "authorship question," and they care a lot. The real question is why. Proponents of various authorship claimants compete in their protestations of admiration for the plays and poems in controversy. But if these works are in fact so universally and inexhaustibly fertile of significance, why should any admirer of them waste precious time, which might better be devoted to the study of the texts themselves, arguing about an ultimately irresoluble historical puzzle? And why is so much of the discussion conducted at such a relatively high pitch of …

Blanket Music Licensing And Local Television: An Historical Accident In Need Of Reform, Frederick C. Boucher

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Proof Of Economic Power In A Sherman Act Tying Arrangement Case: Should Economic Power Be Presumed When The Tying Product Is Patented Or Copyrighted?, J. Dianne Brinson

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

Copyright Compromise And Legislative History , Jessica D. Litman

Cornell Law Review

No abstract provided.

Copyright Protection For Compilations Of Fact: Does The Originality Standard Allow Protection On The Basis Of Industrious Collection, Elizabeth M. Saunders

Notre Dame Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Home Audio Recording Act: An Inappropriate Respose To The Home Taping Question, Teresa E. Sulyok

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This Note examines the controversy over consumers' home audio taping activities and finds the legislation under consideration by Congress an inappropriate remedy. Initially, this Note reviews the proposed legislation introduced in Congress addressing the issue of home audio taping. The Note then surveys the rationale behind the Sony decision, which determined that video recorder manufacturers were not liable as contributory infringers, and advocates that audio recorder manufacturers receive similar treatment. Next, this Note analyzes whether home audio recording may constitute fair use under the federal copyright law. This Note concludes that even if certain forms of home audio recording are …

Masking Copyright Decisionmaking: The Meaninglessness Of Substantial Similarity, Amy B. Cohen

Faculty Scholarship

Traditionally courts have place great weight on the issue of substantial similarity in adjudicating copyright infringement lawsuits. Once success is proven, a court will usually find infringement if the works are viscerally determined to be substantially similar. This Article criticizes the traditional approach as failing adequately to distinguish copying from misappropriation, failing adequately to distinguish ideas from expression, failing to provide adequate guidelines for determining misappropriation, and as overlapping with fair use determinations. The Article also criticizes variations on the traditional approach imposed by the Third and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeal as not remedying the traditional approach's fundamental shortcomings. …

Computer Software Copyright Infringement: The Second Generation, Jeffrey A. Berkowitz

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Copyright Law And Your Neighborhood Bar And Grill: Recent Developments In Performance Rights And The Section 110(5) Exemption, David E. Shipley

Scholarly Works

This Article attempts to clarify the chaotic state of the law concerning performance rights. First, it briefly summarizes the history of this right and discusses some of the problems Congress sought to resolve when it passed the 1976 Act. Second, it outlines several of the Act's key provisions on the performance right. Finally, it discusses the recent decisions which have interpreted these provisions and analyzes their impact on the activities of commercial establishments. These decisions show that the pertinent sections of the 1976 Act provide reasonably clear guidelines outlining the ways in which copyrighted works can be publicly performed or …

Free Speech, Copyright, And Fair Use, L. Ray Patterson

Vanderbilt Law Review

The copyright clause provides that "[the Congress shall have Power... To promote the Progress of Science. ..by securing for limited Times to Authors .. .the exclusive Right to their . . .writings ...."I The first amendment provides that "Congress shall make no law. . .abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press ."..."

Three modern developments portend a conflict between these two clauses of the Constitution: (1) the emergence of the doctrine that free speech encompasses the right to have access to, as well as the right to disseminate, ideas; (2) the elimination of the requirement of publication, which …

Rejection Of Computer Software Licensing Agreements In Bankruptcy, Viktoria L. Gres

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Note On The Desert Theory Paper - 1986, Wendy J. Gordon

Scholarship Chronologically

The desert theory paper may be recast under the title: “The Misappropriation Explosion: Desert Theory in Intellectual Property Law” or “Desert Theory Misapplied.”

Letter To Bruce Ackerman, Wendy J. Gordon

Scholarship Chronologically

I shall be heading back to Rutgers for classes shortly, and I'm sending you a draft of the "Copyright and Copy-privilege" piece in the hope of receiving some additional comments before I enter into the final "polishing" stages later this month. As you know from my last note, the suggestions you made have proved extremely useful -- the title is the least of it. Among other things, your suggestions for reorganization led, indirectly, to a way of unifying the piece on copyright and contract with another piece I've been working on, regarding copyright and tort. I'm very pleased with the …

Letter To Professor Bruce Ackerman, Wendy J. Gordon

Scholarship Chronologically

As I said in my last note, your suggestions for the "Copyright and Copy-privilege" paper have proven extremely valuable. (The title is the least of it.) The reorganization you suggested has allowed the paper to blossom, and I'm extremely pleased with the results.

Harper & Row, Publishers V. Nation Enterprises - Rewriting The Fair Use Criteria?, Douglas B. Teaney

Northern Illinois University Law Review

An examination of the Supreme Court's first detailed discussion of the doctrine offair use in copyright law as embodied in the Copyright Revision Act of 1976. Particular attention is given to the Court's innovative analysis of fair use factors.

Copyright Protection For Architectural Works, David E. Shipley

South Carolina Law Review

No abstract provided.