Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Publication Year
Articles 1 - 18 of 18
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Right To Redemption: Juvenile Dispositions And Sentences, Katherine Hunt Federle
The Right To Redemption: Juvenile Dispositions And Sentences, Katherine Hunt Federle
Louisiana Law Review
The article examines the laws concerning juvenile dispositions and sentences responsible for accountability, victim restoration, and retribution in the U.S. It reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has issued a number of opinions emphasizing that the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment requires that the punishment of children must account for their lesser moral culpability, developmental immaturity, and potential for rehabilitation.
Juvenile Enemy Combatants And The Juvenile Death Penalty In U.S. Military Commissions, Suzanne Farley
Juvenile Enemy Combatants And The Juvenile Death Penalty In U.S. Military Commissions, Suzanne Farley
Santa Clara Law Review
No abstract provided.
Extending Roper's Reasoning To Minnesota's Juvenile Justice System, Lisa Mcnaughton
Extending Roper's Reasoning To Minnesota's Juvenile Justice System, Lisa Mcnaughton
William Mitchell Law Review
No abstract provided.
Capitalizing Adolescence: Juvenile Offenders On Death Row, Mary Berkheiser
Capitalizing Adolescence: Juvenile Offenders On Death Row, Mary Berkheiser
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Johnson V. Commonwealth 591 S.E.2d 47 (Va. 2004)
Johnson V. Commonwealth 591 S.E.2d 47 (Va. 2004)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
State Ex Rel. Simmons V. Roper 112 S.W.3d 397 (Mo. 2003)
State Ex Rel. Simmons V. Roper 112 S.W.3d 397 (Mo. 2003)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
In Re Stanford 123 S. Ct. 472 (2002) (Mem.) Hain V. Muffin 123 S. Ct. 993 (2003) (Mem.)
In Re Stanford 123 S. Ct. 472 (2002) (Mem.) Hain V. Muffin 123 S. Ct. 993 (2003) (Mem.)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Competence, Culpability, And Punishment: Implications Of Atkins For Executing And Sentencing Adolescents, Barry C. Feld
Competence, Culpability, And Punishment: Implications Of Atkins For Executing And Sentencing Adolescents, Barry C. Feld
Hofstra Law Review
No abstract provided.
Too Young To Die: The Juvenile Death Penalty After Atkins V. Virginia, Edmund P. Power
Too Young To Die: The Juvenile Death Penalty After Atkins V. Virginia, Edmund P. Power
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Patterson V. Texas 123 S. Ct. 24 (2002)
The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly: The Limitation Of Defendants' Statutory Rights By Judicial Decisions And Legislative Revisions, Matthew S. T. Clark
The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly: The Limitation Of Defendants' Statutory Rights By Judicial Decisions And Legislative Revisions, Matthew S. T. Clark
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Roach V. Angelone 176 F.3d 210 (4th Cir. 1999)
Roach V. Angelone 176 F.3d 210 (4th Cir. 1999)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Jackson V. Commonwealth 499 S.E.2d 538 (Va. 1998)
Jackson V. Commonwealth 499 S.E.2d 538 (Va. 1998)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Johnson V. Texas 113 S. Ct. 2658 (1993)
Wright V. Commonwealth 245 Va. 177, 427 S.E.2d 379 (1993)
Wright V. Commonwealth 245 Va. 177, 427 S.E.2d 379 (1993)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Applying The Virginia Capital Statute To Juveniles, Kevin Andrew Clunis, Nicholas Vanbuskirk
Applying The Virginia Capital Statute To Juveniles, Kevin Andrew Clunis, Nicholas Vanbuskirk
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Stanford V. Kentucky, Wilkins V. Missouri 109 S. Ct. 2969, 106 L. Ed. 2d 306 (1989) United States Supreme Court
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Thompson V. Oklahoma 486 U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2687, 100 L.Ed.2d -, (1988)
Thompson V. Oklahoma 486 U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2687, 100 L.Ed.2d -, (1988)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.