Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (12)
- Judges (9)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Courts (3)
-
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Law and Gender (3)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (3)
- Banking and Finance Law (2)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Political Science (2)
- President/Executive Department (2)
- American Politics (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Legal Biography (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (1)
- Personality and Social Contexts (1)
- Political Theory (1)
- Psychiatry and Psychology (1)
- Psychological Phenomena and Processes (1)
- Psychology (1)
- Social Psychology (1)
- Institution
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- Bard College (1)
-
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 18 of 18
Full-Text Articles in Law
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh: 2023 Notre Dame Law Review Federal Courts Symposium, Marcus Cole, Brett Kavanaugh
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh: 2023 Notre Dame Law Review Federal Courts Symposium, Marcus Cole, Brett Kavanaugh
2019–Present: G. Marcus Cole
Jan 26, 2023
NOTRE DAME LAW SCHOOL
U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh covered a range of topics during a keynote Q&A at the 2023 Notre Dame Law Review Federal Courts Symposium, held on January 23 in the McCartan Courtroom. Justice Kavanaugh was joined by G. Marcus Cole, the Joseph A. Matson Dean and Professor of Law at Notre Dame Law School, and responded to questions from students and faculty members in the audience.
Discussion Transcript: The Road To Kavanaugh, Paul Stanton Kibel, Caroline Fredrickson
Discussion Transcript: The Road To Kavanaugh, Paul Stanton Kibel, Caroline Fredrickson
Golden Gate University Law Review
DISCUSSION TRANSCRIPT: THE ROAD TO KAVANAUGH, MARCH 15, 2019, GOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW.
The Kavanaugh Court And The Schechter-To-Chevron Spectrum: How The New Supreme Court Will Make The Administrative State More Democratically Accountable, Justin Walker
Indiana Law Journal
In a typical year, Congress passes roughly 800 pages of law—that’s about a seveninch
stack of paper. But in the same year, federal administrative agencies promulgate
80,000 pages of regulations—which makes an eleven-foot paper pillar. This move
toward electorally unaccountable administrators deciding federal policy began in
1935, accelerated in the 1940s, and has peaked in the recent decades. Rather than
elected representatives, unelected bureaucrats increasingly make the vast majority
of the nation’s laws—a trend facilitated by the Supreme Court’s decisions in three
areas: delegation, deference, and independence.
This trend is about to be reversed. In the coming years, Congress will …
Justice Kavanaugh, Lorenzo V. Sec, And The Post-Kennedy Supreme Court, Matthew C. Turk, Karen E. Woody
Justice Kavanaugh, Lorenzo V. Sec, And The Post-Kennedy Supreme Court, Matthew C. Turk, Karen E. Woody
Karen Woody
This Article analyzes a recent Supreme Court case, Lorenzo v. Securities and Exchange Commission, and explains why it provides a valuable window into the Court's future now that Justice Kennedy has retired and his seat filled by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Lorenzo is an important case that raises fundamental interpretative questions about the reach of federal securities statutes. But most significant is its unique procedural posture: when the Supreme Court issues its decision on Lorenzo in 2019, Justice Kavanaugh will be recused while the other eight Justices rule on a lower court opinion from the D.C. Circuit in which he wrote …
Reshaping American Jurisprudence In The Trump Era - The Rise Of Originalist Judges, Jeffrey F. Addicott
Reshaping American Jurisprudence In The Trump Era - The Rise Of Originalist Judges, Jeffrey F. Addicott
Faculty Articles
One of the factors that is often cited as a key reason why President Donald J. Trump was elected as the forty-fifth president, was his pledge to the American people to "make America great again" by appointing "conservative judges" to the bench, particularly when it came to filling any vacancies that might open on the United States Supreme Court. Since the never ending fight for securing an ideological majority on the Supreme Court is always viewed with great concern by both political parties, many wondered whether then candidate Trump was simply telling potential voters what they wanted to hear, or …
Justice Kavanaugh, Lorenzo V. Sec, And The Post-Kennedy Supreme Court, Matthew C. Turk, Karen E. Woody
Justice Kavanaugh, Lorenzo V. Sec, And The Post-Kennedy Supreme Court, Matthew C. Turk, Karen E. Woody
Scholarly Articles
This Article analyzes a recent Supreme Court case, Lorenzo v. Securities and Exchange Commission, and explains why it provides a valuable window into the Court's future now that Justice Kennedy has retired and his seat filled by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Lorenzo is an important case that raises fundamental interpretative questions about the reach of federal securities statutes. But most significant is its unique procedural posture: when the Supreme Court issues its decision on Lorenzo in 2019, Justice Kavanaugh will be recused while the other eight Justices rule on a lower court opinion from the D.C. Circuit in which he wrote …
Sites Of Storytelling: Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings, Patrick Barry
Sites Of Storytelling: Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings, Patrick Barry
Indiana Law Journal
Supreme Court confirmation hearings have an interesting biographical feature: before nominees even say a word, many words are said about them. This feature—which has been on prominent display in the confirmation hearings of Judge Brett Kavanaugh—is a product of how each senator on the confirmation committee is allowed to make an opening statement. Some of these statements are, as Robert Bork remembers from his own confirmation hearing, “lavish in their praise,” some are “lavish in their denunciations,” and some are “lavish in their equivocations.” The result is a disorienting kind of biography by committee, one which produces not one all-encompassing …
Of Trauma And Power: Celebrity Sexual Misconduct Tribunals, Noa Ben-Asher
Of Trauma And Power: Celebrity Sexual Misconduct Tribunals, Noa Ben-Asher
Faculty Publications
In fall 2018, shortly after his nomination to the United States Supreme Court, Judge Brett Kavanaugh was accused of sexual assault. That same year, Professor Avital Ronell was the subject of a Title IX investigation at New York University (NYU), where she served as chair of the Department of German. Both were harshly scrutinized in the court of public opinion. Within several months of each other, these two individuals, at the peak of their prolific careers, were investigated for sexual misconduct by non-judicial tribunals that would determine their fate. Both scandals appeared in the midst of the #MeToo era, during …
Private Lives Of Public Figures, Charlotte Miriam Albert
Private Lives Of Public Figures, Charlotte Miriam Albert
Senior Projects Fall 2019
Senior Project submitted to The Division of Social Studies of Bard College.
Why Kavanaugh Should Not Attend The White House Ceremony, Michael Herz
Why Kavanaugh Should Not Attend The White House Ceremony, Michael Herz
Online Publications
Brett Kavanaugh is now Justice Kavanaugh. He has been nominated, confirmed and — in a private ceremony on Saturday conducted by Chief Justice John Roberts and the retired Justice Anthony Kennedy — sworn in. There is nothing left to do. So why is he scheduled to be at the White House on Monday evening for a public ceremony, one that President Trump has inaccurately called a “swearing-in ceremony”?
Section 2: Trump And The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 2: Trump And The Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
How Strong Does The Evidence Against Kavanaugh Need To Be?, Katherine A. Shaw
How Strong Does The Evidence Against Kavanaugh Need To Be?, Katherine A. Shaw
Online Publications
The allegation made by Christine Blasey Ford — that at age 15 she was the victim of a sexual assault by a 17-year-old Brett Kavanaugh — has not only upended Judge Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court confirmation hearings, but has also left Americans wondering what standards should apply to an accusation like this.
Testimony Of Rebecca Ingber Before The United States Senate Committee On The Judiciary On The Nomination Of Brett Kavanaugh For Associate Justice Of The U.S. Supreme Court, Rebecca Ingber
Faculty Scholarship
Professor Rebecca Ingber testified before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee as it considered the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh for Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Her testimony focused on Judge Kavanaugh's national security and international law jurisprudence, in particular, the court's role in considering international law constraints on the President's war powers, and the potential effects of this judicial approach on executive power.
Judge Kavanaugh And Freedom Of Expression, Timothy Zick
Judge Kavanaugh And Freedom Of Expression, Timothy Zick
Popular Media
No abstract provided.
Abortion Rights And The Kavanaugh Nomination, John M. Greabe
Abortion Rights And The Kavanaugh Nomination, John M. Greabe
Law Faculty Scholarship
[Excerpt] "Last week, President Trump nominated federal appeals court judge Brett Kavanaugh to fill the Supreme Court seat opened by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy. Immediately, coverage of the nomination focused on abortion and whether Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation would spell the end of the constitutional right recognized in Roe v. Wade. Let's explore why."
Forum: What’S The Matter With The Supreme Court?, Michael Klarman, Nadine Strossen, Eli Noam, Sanford Levinson, Mark Tushnet
Forum: What’S The Matter With The Supreme Court?, Michael Klarman, Nadine Strossen, Eli Noam, Sanford Levinson, Mark Tushnet
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Outlook For The New Supreme Court Term, Arthur S. Leonard
Outlook For The New Supreme Court Term, Arthur S. Leonard
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Recovered Memory Of Childhood Sexual Abuse, Aubrey Immelman
Recovered Memory Of Childhood Sexual Abuse, Aubrey Immelman
Psychology Faculty Publications
This article examines the psychological basis for repression and recovery of traumatic memories, presents the results of research on potential sources of error in delayed or recovered memories, and offers possible reasons (primarily related to clinical practice and collective behavior) for false accusations of sexual abuse.