Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (23)
- Law and Economics (12)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (9)
- Economics (8)
- Industrial Organization (8)
-
- Courts (6)
- Intellectual Property Law (6)
- Legal History (5)
- Business (3)
- Consumer Protection Law (3)
- Economic Theory (3)
- Banking and Finance Law (2)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Advertising and Promotion Management (1)
- Benefits and Compensation (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Computer Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Economic Policy (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Growth and Development (1)
- Human Resources Management (1)
- Labor Economics (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Institution
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (9)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- George Washington University Law School (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
-
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (1)
Articles 31 - 32 of 32
Full-Text Articles in Law
State Rejection Of Federal Law, Thomas B. Bennett
State Rejection Of Federal Law, Thomas B. Bennett
Faculty Publications
Sometimes the United States Supreme Court speaks, and states do not follow. For example, in 2003, the Arizona Supreme Court agreed to "reject" a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, because no "sound reasons justif[ied] following" it. Similarly, in 2006, Michigan voters approved a ballot initiative that, according to the legislature that drafted it, sought "at the very least to freeze' the state's ... law to prevent" state courts from following a ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court. Surprising though this language may be, there is nothing nefarious about these cases. Cooper v. Aaron this is not. Unlike more notorious …
Regulating Big Tech: Lessons From The Ftc’S Do Not Call Rule, William E. Kovacic, David A. Hyman
Regulating Big Tech: Lessons From The Ftc’S Do Not Call Rule, William E. Kovacic, David A. Hyman
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
Big Tech (Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google) is under regulatory assault. Cases have been brought against each of these companies in multiple countries around the world, but there is an emerging consensus that more needs to be done – most likely in the form of ex ante regulation that prescribes rules of conduct for dominant information platforms. The European Union and the United Kingdom are well on the way to establishing such frameworks, and the United States appears poised to undertake similar measures in the coming years. Most of the debate has focused on the case for ex ante regulation …