Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Judges (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal Education (2)
-
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (2)
- State and Local Government Law (2)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (1)
- Elder Law (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Military, War, and Peace (1)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (1)
- Social Control, Law, Crime, and Deviance (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Sociology (1)
- Institution
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Law
Analyzing Wrongful Convictions Beyond The Traditional Canonical List Of Errors, For Enduring Structural And Sociological Attributes, (Juveniles, Racism, Adversary System, Policing Policies), Leona D. Jochnowitz, Tonya Kendall
Analyzing Wrongful Convictions Beyond The Traditional Canonical List Of Errors, For Enduring Structural And Sociological Attributes, (Juveniles, Racism, Adversary System, Policing Policies), Leona D. Jochnowitz, Tonya Kendall
Touro Law Review
Researchers identify possible structural causes for wrongful convictions: racism, justice system culture, adversary system, plea bargaining, media, juvenile and mentally impaired accused, and wars on drugs and crime. They indicate that unless the root causes of conviction error are identified, the routine explanations of error (e.g., eyewitness identifications; false confessions) will continue to re-occur. Identifying structural problems may help to prevent future wrongful convictions. The research involves the coding of archival data from the Innocence Project for seventeen cases, including the one for the Central Park Five exonerees. The data were coded by Hartwick College and Northern Vermont University students …
The Uncertain Foundation Of Work Product, Michael A. Blasie
The Uncertain Foundation Of Work Product, Michael A. Blasie
Faculty Scholarly Works
Work product is heavily litigated, extensively studied, and sorely misunderstood. Most blissfully accept it as a combination of codified rules and the seminal case of Hickman v. Taylor. This view settles for a superficial understanding that neither recognizes nor questions underlining assumptions. The codified rules are legislative mandates, Hickman is Supreme Court common law, and they define the doctrine differently. To understand its proper scope of work product, we must know the basis of Hickman v. Taylor, whether it can coexist with codified rules, and what happens when they conflict. This Article takes the novel view that work product is …
Supreme Court, Kings County, People V. Miller, Courtney Weinberger
Supreme Court, Kings County, People V. Miller, Courtney Weinberger
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Toward A Balanced Approach To "Frivolous" Litigation: A Critical Review Of Federal Rule 11 And State Sanctions Provisions , Byron C. Keeling
Toward A Balanced Approach To "Frivolous" Litigation: A Critical Review Of Federal Rule 11 And State Sanctions Provisions , Byron C. Keeling
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Serving Our Elders- Advocates And Adversaries, Stephanie Sue Stein
Serving Our Elders- Advocates And Adversaries, Stephanie Sue Stein
Marquette Elder's Advisor
While the Older Americans Act creates a remarkable structure under which various advocates can work together for the benefit of the elderly, situations can arise in which different viewpoints or interpretations of law can pit advocates against each other. Three case study examples are given. Stein acknowledges that different perspectives are inevitable and recommends working together instead of letting disputes escalate.
Lochner V. New York (1905) And Kennedy V. Louisiana (2008): Judicial Reliance On Adversary Argument, Douglas E. Abrams
Lochner V. New York (1905) And Kennedy V. Louisiana (2008): Judicial Reliance On Adversary Argument, Douglas E. Abrams
Faculty Publications
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist called Lochner v. New York (1905) “one of the most ill-starred decisions that [the Supreme Court ever rendered.” The Justices’ deliberations preceding the 5-4 decision demonstrate the courts’ reliance on advocacy in the adversary system of civil and criminal justice. The stark imbalance between the state’s “incredibly sketchy” brief and Joseph Lochner’s sterling submission may have determined Lochner’s outcome, and thus may have changed the course of constitutional history, by leading two Justices to join the majority on the central question of whether New York’s maximum-hours law for bakery workers was a reasonable public health …
Attorneys As Debt Relief Agencies: Constitutional Considerations, Marisa Terranova
Attorneys As Debt Relief Agencies: Constitutional Considerations, Marisa Terranova
Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law
No abstract provided.
Mediation Paradigms And Professional Identities: Can Mediators Activate A New Movement For Justice?, John M. Lande
Mediation Paradigms And Professional Identities: Can Mediators Activate A New Movement For Justice?, John M. Lande
Faculty Publications
This article, written early in the modern ADR era, provided a framework for developing the mediation field. It begins by elaborating William Simon’s critique of the “ideology of advocacy.” Simon argues that the adversary system is supposed to foster values of individuality, autonomy, responsibility, and dignity, but it often undermines those values in practice. This article catalogs a “parade of horribles” experienced by disputants, attorneys, judges, and the public. These include unequal access to justice, procedural rules that frustrate substantive justice, a narrow set of available remedies, a game psychology undermines respect for law and justice, parties’ alienating experience in …
Lawyers' Negligence Liability To Non-Clients: A Texas Viewpoint., Brian J. Davis
Lawyers' Negligence Liability To Non-Clients: A Texas Viewpoint., Brian J. Davis
St. Mary's Law Journal
Courts should examine the relationship of a non-client to a negligent lawyer to determine whether a lawyer is liable to a non-client despite lack of privity. In most jurisdictions, attorneys enjoy the privity of contract requirement which limits their duty to exercise reasonable care. As a result, lawyers are normally immune to negligent malpractice actions brought by non-clients. Courts should examine the relationship between the attorney and the non-client to determine whether the requirement of privity is an overly restrictive limit on the lawyer’s scope of duty. These relationships can be classified into three categories. The first category involves plaintiffs …
Some Further Reflections On The Problem Of Adequacy Of Trial Counsel , Warren E. Burger
Some Further Reflections On The Problem Of Adequacy Of Trial Counsel , Warren E. Burger
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bad News And Good News, John W. Reed
Bad News And Good News, John W. Reed
Articles
I have been asked to visit with you about some of my current interests in the evidence field, in which I teach. When you invite an academic lawyer to speak at your meeting, you obviously expect of him something other than the latest hot tips on trial strategy and tactics, something other than a speech entitled "Reflections on My Last Eleven Victories in Court." Others can do that for you, probably at lunch - or, even better, at cocktails with the successes more impressive and the defeats more forgivable under the influence of an ounce or two of alcohol.
Bad News And Good News, John W. Reed
Bad News And Good News, John W. Reed
Other Publications
Law schools do one thing superbly well: they teach the intellectual skills of reasoning, of distinction drawing, of deductive and inductive logic, of anlysis and synthesis. These are heavily verbal skills, at least in the context in which lawyers employ them, and students are tested for their mastery of these skills by written examinations. If one does well, he or she is placed on the law review, where these particular skills are honed even further.