Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Creditors' Self-Help Remedies Under Ucc Section 9-503: Violative Of Due Process In Texas., David Hughes Dec 1973

Creditors' Self-Help Remedies Under Ucc Section 9-503: Violative Of Due Process In Texas., David Hughes

St. Mary's Law Journal

In Sniadach v. Family Fiance Corp. and Fuentes v. Shevin, the Supreme Court stated that the due process clause of the 14th Amendment requires notice and an opportunity to be heard before seizing property under color of state law. Accordingly, creditor self-help repossession under Section 9.503 of the Uniform Commercial Code, and its Texas counterpart, are now constitutionally suspect, which can be seen in the numerous constitutional attacks in federal courts. Because deprivation of due process requires some form of state action, numerous cases have litigated the scope of state action. To find state action, there must be conduct of …


The Abolition Of Self-Help Repossession: The Poor Pay Even More, James J. White Jan 1973

The Abolition Of Self-Help Repossession: The Poor Pay Even More, James J. White

Articles

In this paper I propose to identify possible ways in which a court could uphold the constitutionality of section 9-503 without an explicit rejection of Fuentes v. Shevin. It is my thesis that Fuentes v. Shevin is probably an undesirable outcome, and that the application of the same doctrine to self-help repossession is certainly undesirable and would constitute due process gone berserk. My arguments will not be novel; each has been suggested by the courts that have considered this matter, or by the briefs of the lawyers who have argued these cases. I cannot even claim to have collected the …


Some Problems Of Consumer Class Actions, John Krahmer Jan 1972

Some Problems Of Consumer Class Actions, John Krahmer

University of Richmond Law Review

As a procedural device the class action has a respectably long history and, from its beginnings, has been recognized as an action founded at least as much upon convenience as upon legal theory. Interestingly enough, it was the insistence of the early equity courts on the convenient administration of justice that led to the general rule requiring all parties interested in the subject matter of a suit to be joined before the suit could go forward, and this rule presented the first barrier to the maintenance of a class suit. As Professor Chafee has pointed out, the early judges, concerned …