Law Commons^™

Kebebasan Hakim Memutus Perkara Dalam Konteks Pancasila (Ditinjau Dari Keadilan “Substantif”), Ery Setyanegara

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Perolehan Dan Hak Waris Dari Istri Kedua, Ketiga Dan Keempat Dalam Hukum Kewarisan Islam Di Indonesia (Sebuah Pemahaman Dengan Ilmu Hukum, Filsafat Hukum Dan Paradigmatik), Didi Sukardi

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Privatisasi Bumn Dan Otonomi Daerah Dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Indonesia, M.Rizal Alif

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pelaksanaan Atau Eksekusi Putusan Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Basyarnas) Sebagai Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama, Ummi Uzma

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Hubungan Hukum Dan Moralitas Menurut H.L.A Hart, Petrus Ckl Bello

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Analisis Semiotika Hukum Terhadap Lambang Negara Republik Indonesia, Turiman Turiman

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Kerangka Kebijakan Dan Reformasi Hukum Untuk Kelancaran Perdagangan Secara Elektronik (E-Commerce) Di Indonesia, Edmon Makarim

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Note: Antitrust Law In Professional Sports: How Major League Baseball Has Continued Being The Exception To The Rule, Joey Martinez

ConLawNOW

This Note argues that baseball should be put on the same playing field as other professional sports leagues. It explores the legal anomaly of baseball’s antitrust exemption and argues that either the Supreme Court or Congress should remove the exemption to subject Major League Baseball to federal antitrust laws to increase competition in professional baseball and improve conditions in the minor leagues. The article traces the history of baseball’s hundred-year-old antitrust exemption and details how the federal courts and Congress have treated it, including recent attempts by Congress to repeal baseball’s exemption. It then compares baseball to other professional and …

Comparative Study On Institutional Design And Scope Of Grounds Of Criminal Cases Review Between Indonesia And The United Kingdom, Rahman Syamsuddin, Muhammad Ikram Nur Fuady, Hasdiwanti Hasdiwanti, Hilmiah Hilmiah

Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)

This study examines to examine the comparative framework of criminal cases review between Indonesia and the United Kingdom (UK), focusing on the scope of grounds and institutional framework. Both jurisdictions recognize post-conviction review as an extraordinary legal remedy intended to prevent miscarriages of justice. Indonesia employs revision (PK –Peninjauan Kembali) as a restrictive system, similar to the Court of Appeal. The UK adopts a broader and more flexible model through Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). The study used secondary data and literature reviews, with a comparative legal approach grounded in normative and institutional analysis, assessing the legal structures, procedural …

Integrating Free, Prior, And Informed Consent Into Indonesia's Palm Oil Regulatory Framework For Indigenous Protection, Ermanto Fahamsyah, Natasya Aulia Putri, Ramadhan Dwi Saputra, Vicko Taniady

Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)

This study examines the absence of a binding Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) mechanism in Indonesia's palm oil regulatory framework, which has resulted in recurring land conflicts and insufficient protection for indigenous peoples whose customary territories are converted into plantation concessions. It aims to analyze the weaknesses of the current legal framework and to evaluate FPIC models in the Philippines and Colombia as potential references for national reform. This study adopts a normative legal method using statutory, case-based, and comparative approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials were examined to assess Indonesia's existing protections for indigenous peoples and to compare …

Jenis-Jenis Sanksi Pidana Yang Dapat Diterapkan Terhadap Korporasi, Kristian Kristian

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Di Indonesia Dengan Negara-Negara Common Law System, Kurniawan Kurniawan

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Ilmu Hukum: Hakekat Keilmuannya Ditinjau Dari Sudut Filsafat Ilmu Dan Teori Ilmu Hukum, Titik Triwulan Tutik

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Urgensi Pengadilan Agama Sebagai Penyelesai Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah, Sufiarina Sufiarina

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Konstruksi Makna Yuridis Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dalam Pasal 18b Uudn Ri Tahun 1945 Untuk Identifikasi Adanya Masyarakat Hukum Adat, Lalu Sabardi

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Fasilitas Perpajakan (Tax Holiday) Pembebasan Atau Pengurangan Pajak Penghasilan Badan Bagi Perusahaan Industri (Kalangan Dunia Usaha) Yang Melakukan Penanaman Modal Di Indonesia, Djafar Ai Bram

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Korupsi Dan Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian, Wahyu Wiriadinata

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Paradoks Kriminalisasi Korupsi: Suatu Ancaman Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik Dalam Sektor Telekomunikasi, Edmon Makarim

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pembangungan Berkelanjutan: Status Hukum Dan Pemaknaannya, Andri G. Wibisana

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pelanggaran Internet Marketing Pada Kegiatan E-Commerce Dikaitkan Dengan Etika Bisnis, Imas Rosidawati, Edy Santoso

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Analisis Terhadap Hambatan Pelaksanaan Perlindungan Hukum Tenun Siak Di Kabupaten Siak Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2002 Tentang Hak Cipta, Dasrol Dasrol

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Separation Of Copyright Powers, Blake Reid

Seattle Journal of Technology, Environmental, & Innovation Law

The United States Copyright Office’s multifarious roles in the U.S. copyright system have long prompted uncertainty about its position among the branches of the federal government. From its formal home in the Library of Congress, the chameleonic Office has accumulated a wide range of advisory, rulemaking, adjudicative, and administrative functions that have long prompted questions about both agencies’ exercise of dueling legislative and executive powers. Despite its increasingly sprawling portfolio and unusual configuration, the Office has never faced a serious separation-of-powers reckoning—until now. In the span of just five days in May 2025, Donald Trump fired the Librarian of Congress …

Avoiding Pandora’S Box: Why Federal Nondiscrimination Statutes Do Not Prohibit Health Insurance Coverage Exclusions Of Sex-Rejecting Procedures, Rachel N. Morrison

Catholic University Law Review

There is increasing litigation over whether employer-provided health insurance and state Medicaid plans can exclude coverage of procedures for “gender transitions.” Plaintiffs claim that gender-transition coverage exclusions violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and federal nondiscrimination statutes. While Fourteenth Amendment claims should be foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s holding in Geduldig v. Aiello, nondiscrimination claims require a separate analysis.

This article shows the proper analysis for whether coverage exclusions of transition procedures violate federal nondiscrimination statutes. Looking to the history of coverage exclusion claims, Part I traces sex and pregnancy discrimination claims challenging coverage exclusions of …

Governmental Debanking, Julie Andersen Hill

Texas A&M Law Review

In November 2024, debanking grabbed national headlines when venture capitalist Marc Andreessen appeared on the popular Joe Rogan podcast. Andreessen claimed that, driven by political motivations, government bank regulators had forced banks to close accounts of crypto customers. While crypto industry participants supported the claims, regulators denied debanking. Others branded the debanking allegations a right-wing conspiracy. This is just the latest example of the debanking debate that has raged for decades with little resolution. This Article argues that this debate is undercutting public confidence in bank regulators and the banking system. It is time for a more permanent fix of …

Take Fair Housing All The Way Up: Navigating The Intersection Of Decentralization, Innovation, And Preemption, Melvin J. Kelley Iv

Texas A&M Law Review

Cities are the temporospatial embodiment of local economies, constructed on the scaffold of racial capitalism. Pursuant to decades of public-private ventures to entrench segregation, some cities have been given a treasure trove of resources while others have been—and continue to be—deprived. Community organizers and local governments in urban areas have attempted to disrupt enduring spatial inequities through policies advancing civil rights, economic justice, and sustainable development. But far too often these efforts have been brushed aside by sweeping state laws that intentionally, exhaustively, and punitively remove topics from the purview of local action. This Article responds to calls issued by …

Rahimi's Goldilocks Dilemma: Finding The "Just Right" Age Of Tradition, James M. Handwerk

Texas A&M Law Review

Although its edges are obscured with unresolved tension, the Supreme Court’s recent sortie into Second Amendment interpretation sparked a new era of historical scrutiny. Some question whether the various difficulties present in the new framework render the doctrine unworkable. Rahimi’s Goldilocks Dilemma examines the interpretive obstacles posed by the text, history, and tradition framework, which was brought to light in New York State Pistol & Rifle Ass’n v. Bruen and United States v. Rahimi. Particularly, this Comment focuses on the role that pre-ratification history plays in finding “relevant” historical analogs. Pre-ratification history, as defined by this Comment, includes …

Nonparty Claim Preclusion, Mark D. Rosen

Texas A&M Law Review

For nearly two centuries, American courts recited that the preclusive effects of a court’s final judgment were subject to a requirement of “mutuality,” meaning that a party in Lawsuit 2 who would not be bound by a judgment from a prior Lawsuit 1 could not benefit in Lawsuit 2 from the first lawsuit’s judgment either. While the Supreme Court eliminated the mutuality requirement for issue preclusion in the 1970s—paving the way for “nonmutual collateral estoppel”—to this date, the Court has not decided if mutuality remains a requirement for claim preclusion. Although many courts today insist there is no such thing …

The Federal Gap In Sports Betting, Aimen Taqi

LLR Forum

The modern sports betting market has outgrown the legal framework that governs it. Drawing on examples from the NBA, this article highlights four areas in which federal legislation is needed: player specific proposition bets, the rise of bettor harassment directed at players and coaches, the absence of a centralized public reporting and oversight structure, and the growing use of prediction market or event contract labeling to evade ordinary gambling regulation. This article contends that Congress should adopt a federal floor for sports betting that restricts the bet types most susceptible to manipulation, requires uniform reporting and oversight, imposes anti-harassment obligations …

When Platform Regulations Fail: An Institutional Fix For California Social Media Laws, Roz Kohan

LLR Forum

Three recent Ninth Circuit decisions struck down parts of California’s content moderation laws regarding transparency, child-safety, and algorithmic design on First Amendment grounds. Such challenges act as a barrier to effective platform regulation. When examining past speech regulations that withstood such challenges, telecommunications law provides guidance for the platform context. The lack of expert administrative agencies accounts for the failures of content moderation regulation. This Forum Article argues for the creation of a specialized California agency to produce rules and regulations that withstand First Amendment challenges.

An Examination Of Regulatory Approaches To Artificial Intelligence In Hiring Practices, Pasqualle Yamakawa, Amber Reid

LLR Forum

This Comment explores the growing tension between innovation and accountability in the use of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) in hiring. As employers increasingly rely on AI-driven screening tools, concerns over algorithmic bias and hidden discrimination have sparked both litigation and regulatory action. Using Mobley v. Workday, Inc. as a lens, this Comment examines the expanding scope of liability for both employers and AI vendors. It then compares emerging regulatory frameworks across the United States and European Union. This Comment concludes that Colorado’s approach to AI regulation stands out as the most comprehensive model, offering a clearer path to reducing discrimination while …