Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (1070)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1023)
- International Law (807)
- Criminal Law (737)
- Law and Society (703)
-
- Legal Education (695)
- Intellectual Property Law (595)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (540)
- Environmental Law (536)
- Courts (503)
- Administrative Law (501)
- Science and Technology Law (462)
- Human Rights Law (448)
- Health Law and Policy (429)
- Criminal Procedure (427)
- Legal Profession (411)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (381)
- State and Local Government Law (374)
- Law and Race (368)
- Arts and Humanities (366)
- Business (355)
- Law and Politics (353)
- Supreme Court of the United States (350)
- Law and Economics (347)
- Legislation (329)
- Labor and Employment Law (320)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (305)
- Business Organizations Law (304)
- First Amendment (301)
- Institution
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (482)
- University of Maine School of Law (287)
- University of South Carolina (272)
- University of Michigan Law School (244)
- Notre Dame Law School (206)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (188)
- University of Chicago Law School (186)
- Universitas Indonesia (185)
- Seton Hall University (182)
- Southern Methodist University (181)
- William & Mary Law School (181)
- University of Missouri School of Law (168)
- Duke Law (165)
- Fordham Law School (155)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (148)
- Roger Williams University (148)
- UC Law SF (148)
- University of Minnesota Law School (147)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (144)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (140)
- Columbia Law School (138)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (133)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (131)
- Seattle University School of Law (128)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (127)
- University of Kentucky (119)
- University of Georgia School of Law (116)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (116)
- Boston University School of Law (115)
- University of Colorado Law School (106)
- Keyword
-
- University of South Carolina School of Law (207)
- Artificial intelligence (171)
- J. Nelson Frierson (120)
- Law (120)
- James Nelson Frierson (119)
-
- AI (114)
- Constitutional law (113)
- First Amendment (97)
- Samuel L. Prince (91)
- Samuel Lander Prince (91)
- S. L. Prince (88)
- Supreme Court (87)
- Copyright (81)
- Human rights (75)
- International law (75)
- Criminal law (74)
- Constitutional Law (71)
- Jr. (71)
- Climate change (69)
- Justice (63)
- Legal education (62)
- Discrimination (61)
- Privacy (59)
- Intellectual property (56)
- Regulation (55)
- Constitution (51)
- Generative AI (51)
- Technology (51)
- Education (50)
- Immigration (48)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (447)
- Maine Law Review (262)
- Articles (239)
- Faculty Publications (195)
- Frierson, James Nelson (1920-1946) (118)
-
- Kentucky Law Journal (92)
- Prince, Samuel Lander (1946-1959) (89)
- Scholarly Works (81)
- FIU Law Review (80)
- Student Works (80)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (78)
- Fordham Law Review (72)
- Faculty Articles (71)
- Mercer Law Review (68)
- Scholarly Articles (65)
- 2025–2026 Flyers (59)
- Seattle University Law Review (58)
- Roger Williams University Law Review (57)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (56)
- Missouri Law Review (55)
- St. John's Law Review (55)
- GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works (54)
- North Carolina Law Review (54)
- Publications (54)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (54)
- UC Law Journal (53)
- internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny (internet Quarterly on Antitrust and Regulation) (53)
- Journal of Financial Crises (50)
- Touro Law Review (50)
- Cardozo Law Review (49)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 481 - 510 of 10548
Full-Text Articles in Law
University Of Baltimore Law Review, Volume 54, Issue 3, Winter 2025
University Of Baltimore Law Review, Volume 54, Issue 3, Winter 2025
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Simple Case For Slavery Reparations: Title To Slavery’S Fruits Did Not Pass, Brian C. Potts
A Simple Case For Slavery Reparations: Title To Slavery’S Fruits Did Not Pass, Brian C. Potts
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Elected Prosecutors And Discretionary Dissonance In The Pursuit Of Racial Justice, Leo Gabriel Tucker
Elected Prosecutors And Discretionary Dissonance In The Pursuit Of Racial Justice, Leo Gabriel Tucker
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Toward An Equitable Legal Marijuana Market In Maryland: Assessing Development Strategies, Jasmine L. Tyler
Toward An Equitable Legal Marijuana Market In Maryland: Assessing Development Strategies, Jasmine L. Tyler
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
The "Case" To Increase Access To Justice In Copyright Law: A Closer Look At The Copyright Claims Board, Anne Clevenger
The "Case" To Increase Access To Justice In Copyright Law: A Closer Look At The Copyright Claims Board, Anne Clevenger
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Baltimore Law Review, Volume 55, Issue 1, Winter 2026
University Of Baltimore Law Review, Volume 55, Issue 1, Winter 2026
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Right To Be Born?: What Dobbs Could Mean For Artificial Reproductive Technologies, Stewart Chang
A Right To Be Born?: What Dobbs Could Mean For Artificial Reproductive Technologies, Stewart Chang
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Over The Legal Limit: One State’S Attempt To Control Abortion Healthcare Access Outside Its Borders, Wendy Heipt, William Mitchell, Kelly O’Neill
Over The Legal Limit: One State’S Attempt To Control Abortion Healthcare Access Outside Its Borders, Wendy Heipt, William Mitchell, Kelly O’Neill
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Elections Don’T Have Consequences—How Over 57% Of Florida Voters Supported Abortion Rights And Still Lost, Mark Dorosin
Elections Don’T Have Consequences—How Over 57% Of Florida Voters Supported Abortion Rights And Still Lost, Mark Dorosin
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Abortion On The Move: Navigating The Fractured Reproductive Healthcare Landscape, Claire Laurier Decoteau, Kim D. Ricardo
Abortion On The Move: Navigating The Fractured Reproductive Healthcare Landscape, Claire Laurier Decoteau, Kim D. Ricardo
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
How States Decide: The Role Of Judicial Selection In Modern Abortion Jurisprudence, Lesley Bauer
How States Decide: The Role Of Judicial Selection In Modern Abortion Jurisprudence, Lesley Bauer
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Miscarriage Of Democracy: What Happened In Arkansas, Florida, Nebraska, And South Dakota To Defeat Abortion-Related Ballot Measures In 2024, Deborah Machalow
Miscarriage Of Democracy: What Happened In Arkansas, Florida, Nebraska, And South Dakota To Defeat Abortion-Related Ballot Measures In 2024, Deborah Machalow
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
Money And Shame: Leaving Menstruators At Risk, Melissa Bosley
Money And Shame: Leaving Menstruators At Risk, Melissa Bosley
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
2024-2025 Annual Report, Stephanie C. Miller
2024-2025 Annual Report, Stephanie C. Miller
Law Library Annual Reports and Assessments
No abstract provided.
From Quid Post Quo To Quid Pro Quo: Toward An Evidentiary Standard For 18 U.S.C. § 666 After Snyder, Luke Henkel
From Quid Post Quo To Quid Pro Quo: Toward An Evidentiary Standard For 18 U.S.C. § 666 After Snyder, Luke Henkel
University of Chicago Law Review
This Comment addresses a question left unanswered by the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Snyder v. United States. Snyder held that the federal funds bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 666, covers only bribes, not gratuities. That is, an agreement to exchange payment for an official act by a state or local government official is criminally prohibited (if the official’s agency receives a certain amount of federal funding). But § 666 does not prohibit payments made after official acts so long as there was no agreement to conduct a quid pro quo exchange beforehand. Thus, the key issue in cases with …
Pardoning Corporations, Brandon Stras
Pardoning Corporations, Brandon Stras
University of Chicago Law Review
In 1977, a company convicted of conspiring with the mob asked President Jimmy Carter for a pardon. Government officials speculated that the President could grant the request, but ultimately the President decided that the company did not deserve clemency. Nearly fifty years later, President Donald Trump pardoned a company and commuted the sentence of another. People are again wondering whether the pardon power covers companies, but no one can offer evidence either way.
History shows that the pardon power covers companies. Before the Founding, the King would often pardon corporations. Both the City of London and the Massachusetts Bay Company …
Sincerity Or Substantial Burden? Investigating The Proper Threshold Test For Prisoner Free Exercise Claims, David Wang
Sincerity Or Substantial Burden? Investigating The Proper Threshold Test For Prisoner Free Exercise Claims, David Wang
University of Chicago Law Review
When prison officials violate the free exercise rights of prisoners, prisoners can seek recourse under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. However, due to the specialized and restrictive nature of prisons, courts adjudicate these claims under a reasonableness test set out in the case Turner v. Safley instead of under a strict scrutiny standard. While circuits agree on using the Turner test for prisoner free exercise claims, there is a deep circuit split on the proper threshold test for these types of claims.
While some circuits hold that inmates need to show that their religious practice was substantially burdened, other circuits hold …
From Winans To Wallahee: Treaties, The Washington State Supreme Court, And The Pursuit Of A More Just Rule Of Law, Monte Mills
From Winans To Wallahee: Treaties, The Washington State Supreme Court, And The Pursuit Of A More Just Rule Of Law, Monte Mills
Washington Law Review
The relationship between the United States federal government, the states, and Native Nations has long been at the core of federal Indian law. From the earliest decades of its jurisprudence, for example, the United States Supreme Court struggled in its efforts to analyze and define the rights, authorities, and interactions of Native Nations within and in relation to the evolving structure of constitutional federalism. Treaties between the United States and Native Nations were central to those decisions and provided a necessary, constitutional check against state interests intent on eliminating sovereign Native Nations. Those constitutional and structural implications thus go well …
Who Counts As A "Reasonable Employee"? The Third Circuit's Bungling Of Section 8(A)(1) Violations, Ben Milstein
Who Counts As A "Reasonable Employee"? The Third Circuit's Bungling Of Section 8(A)(1) Violations, Ben Milstein
Washington Law Review
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects private employees’ right to unionize and collectively bargain with their employers. Section 7 of the NLRA guarantees employees the right to self-organize labor unions, while section 8 outlines numerous unfair labor practices. Specifically, section 8(a)(1) bans employer interference, coercion, or restraint of any section 7 rights. In a 2022 case, FDRLST Media v. NLRB, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) finding that FDRLST Media’s executive officer’s tweet constituted a section 8(a)(1) violation. This Comment examines the history of section 8(a)(1) violations, specifically discussing the widely …
The Reasonability Rule For Medical Damages In Tort: In Defense Of Chargemaster Recovery, Avery E. Tunstill
The Reasonability Rule For Medical Damages In Tort: In Defense Of Chargemaster Recovery, Avery E. Tunstill
Washington Law Review
In a personal injury suit, Washington law requires the plaintiff to prove that their medical costs are reasonable to recover damages for those costs. Tort reform proponents attempt to use this reasonability rule to limit tort damages awards. They argue that a plaintiff should only recover a portion of a hospital’s bill because most people do not pay a hospital’s sticker price—or the “chargemaster rate”—for medical care. Some reformers argue that recovery rates should instead be based on a set figure. Others argue in favor of eliminating the collateral source rule, which prohibits juries from reducing tort damages awards in …
The Supreme Court Of India's Use Of Inherent Power Under Article 142 Of The Constitution: An Empirical Study, M. P. Ram Mohan, Sriram Prasad, Vijay V. Venkitesh, Sai Muralidhar, Jacob P Alex
The Supreme Court Of India's Use Of Inherent Power Under Article 142 Of The Constitution: An Empirical Study, M. P. Ram Mohan, Sriram Prasad, Vijay V. Venkitesh, Sai Muralidhar, Jacob P Alex
National Law School of India Review
The Constitution of India under Article 142 grants the Supreme Court of India broad inherent powers to do complete justice. The contours of these inherent powers and what it means to achieve complete justice were left to the Supreme Court to determine on its own. In this paper, we empirically examine all the Supreme Court cases from its inception in 1950 till 2023 which use the term “Article 142” or “complete justice.” We found 1579 cases, which were then hand-coded for many variables such as the nature of the case, where the case was appealed from, the temporal distribution, the …
2025 Cardozo Law Library Annual Report, Dr. Lillian & Dr. Rebecca Chutick Law Library
2025 Cardozo Law Library Annual Report, Dr. Lillian & Dr. Rebecca Chutick Law Library
Library Annual Reports
This annual report presents an overview of the Dr. Lillian & Dr. Rebecca Chutick Law Library’s activities and accomplishments during the 2024–2025 fiscal year. It includes highlights on research instruction, faculty and student services, collections management, classroom technology, scholarly communications, and strategic priorities for 2025–2026.
From Policy To Practice: How Institutional Interpretations Of Ferpa Shape The Campus Safety Conversation, Britney Deaver
From Policy To Practice: How Institutional Interpretations Of Ferpa Shape The Campus Safety Conversation, Britney Deaver
Electronic Theses and Dissertations
The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) is a foundational federal law designed to protect the privacy of student education records. FERPA includes exceptions—such as for health and safety emergencies—that institutions may interpret and apply in varied ways. This qualitative study explores how higher education professionals across diverse institutional contexts conceptualize and apply the health or safety exception, and how those interpretations influence campus safety practices and policy-making. Through semi-structured interviews with compliance officers and administrators, the research examines the intersection of federal policy, institutional culture, and individual judgment.
Findings reveal a range of interpretations shaped by institutional risk …
Lynk Labs: How The Least-Vetted Documents Destroy Issued Patents, Dennis D. Crouch
Lynk Labs: How The Least-Vetted Documents Destroy Issued Patents, Dennis D. Crouch
Faculty Publications
The Lynk Labs petition presents the Supreme Court with an opportunity to restore the temporal coherence that Congress built into § 311(b)'s evidentiary framework. By treating "printed publication" as synonymous with any reference that eventually becomes public, the Federal Circuit has transformed IPR into a forum where unexamined, abandoned patent applications can destroy patents that survived the very scrutiny those applications failed to complete. The Court should grant certiorari and hold that a printed publication must be printed and published before the critical date to serve as the basis for an IPR challenge.
Solving Professors' Dilemmas About Prohibiting Or Promoting Student Ai Use, John Lande
Solving Professors' Dilemmas About Prohibiting Or Promoting Student Ai Use, John Lande
Faculty Publications
Faculty face difficult dilemmas as law students increasingly use generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT. Should faculty prohibit student use of AI in course work, allow it within limits, or actively encourage it to build professional skills? Because students already use AI tools, faculty must respond. Doing nothing can undermine core educational goals.
This article offers practical strategies for addressing these dilemmas. These strategies are designed to promote learning, uphold academic integrity, and prepare students for an evolving legal profession. This article outlines two broad approaches: restricting unauthorized AI use and promoting responsible, supervised use. It provides concrete suggestions …
An Analysis Of Policies Impacting Ex-Offenders And The Barriers Created In Their Transition Into Society: A Qualitative Metasynthesis, Thomas A. Ayala
An Analysis Of Policies Impacting Ex-Offenders And The Barriers Created In Their Transition Into Society: A Qualitative Metasynthesis, Thomas A. Ayala
Theses & Dissertations
In 2018, more than six million people in the United States were under correctional supervision, including incarceration, probation, or parole, equivalent to 1 in 40 adults (Maruschak & Minton, 2020). While this reflects a decline from previous years, prison populations reversed course in 2022, increasing by 2% nationwide, with 36 states and federal facilities reporting higher inmate counts (Nellis, 2024). Since 1973, policy shifts have fueled the rise of mass incarceration (Nellis, 2021; O’Brien, 2020). According to the Pew Center, the United States remains a global outlier, holding 5% of the world’s population, but incarcerates 25% of the 9 million …
Hall V. Warden, 141 Nev. Adv. Op. 70 (Dec. 23, 2025), Andre Anaya
Hall V. Warden, 141 Nev. Adv. Op. 70 (Dec. 23, 2025), Andre Anaya
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Nevada Court of Appeals held pursuant to NRS 34.810(2), inmates must fully exhaust all grievance remedies before filing habeas petitions over time-served credits.
Complaints.Gov: Building A Modern Infrastructure For Accountability, Erie Meyer
Complaints.Gov: Building A Modern Infrastructure For Accountability, Erie Meyer
Center for Law and the Economy
This report proposes the establishment of a national complaint portal, complaints.gov, to connect consumers with government resources to remediate disputes with business products or services. The report references the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's consumer complaint portal – used to remediate disputes regarding loans, credit, and other consumer financial products – as a model for complaint clearinghouse infrastructure that can be integrated across the federal government. The report details steps for implementation of the complaints.gov portal and argues for consumer complaint remediation as a strategy for identifying market failures and promoting fair competition.
Workers’ Rights: Legal Protections Against Discrimination For Undocumented Employees, Nathan C. Zipperian, Mark Xiao, Kari Siegenthaler
Workers’ Rights: Legal Protections Against Discrimination For Undocumented Employees, Nathan C. Zipperian, Mark Xiao, Kari Siegenthaler
Immigration Law Blog
Although undocumented workers are protected from workplace discrimination through federal and state laws, increasingly common immigration raids on workplaces coupled with widespread racist sentiment has caused some employers to preemptively terminate employees they suspect are undocumented. Even if undocumented workers succeed in keeping their employment, employers often weaponize the threat of immigration enforcement to create an environment of exploitation in which undocumented workers feel they cannot report abusive employer conduct.
This article will outline the legal protections afforded to undocumented people in the workplace, as well as detailing empirical studies that outline the types of discrimination undocumented workers often experience. …