Law Commons^™

Dean Erwin Chemerinsky Opening Remarks, Doctrine And Diversity Symposium, Aals Annual Meeting, Erwin Chemerinsky

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Belonging, And Social Justice In The Curriculum, In The Classroom, And In The Courtroom, Nicole P. Dyszlewski, Diana Hassel

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Changemakers: Master Of Studies In Law: 'Something New And Different...': Monique Kuester, Roger Williams University School Of Law

Life of the Law School (1993- )

No abstract provided.

Changemakers: The Long Road To The Law : Kiron Ireland, Michelle Choate

Life of the Law School (1993- )

No abstract provided.

Changemakers: From The Classroom To The Courtroom: Miguel Garcia, Roger Williams University School Of Law

Life of the Law School (1993- )

No abstract provided.

Changemakers: Elevating Conversations Around Indigenous Peoples' Rights, Roger Williams University School Of Law

Life of the Law School (1993- )

No abstract provided.

Changemakers: 'Hard Work, Determination, And Dedication': Arya Omshehe, Roger Williams University School Of Law

Life of the Law School (1993- )

No abstract provided.

A Claims Agent Can Only Profit From The Fees The Clerk Of Court Can Charge, Peter Berkanish

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In the Southern District of New York, the retention of claims agents is governed by the judicial procedure set forth in section 156(c) of title 28 of the United States Code, for cases under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) that involve 250 or more creditors and equity holders. When a claims agent is retained under section 156(c), the claims agent is acting in the same capacity as the clerk and the services are “limited in scope to those duties that would be performed by a Clerk of Court with respect to …

The Intersection Of The Bankruptcy Courts And Ferc, Amanda Gazzo

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In the past, the bankruptcy courts and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) have been involved in a power struggle with one another. Congress has granted bankruptcy courts exclusive authority to allow debtors to reject executory contracts in chapter 11 reorganization cases. Additionally, Congress has granted FERC authority to govern over utility entities’ filed-rates, which are sometimes contained in executory contracts. It is in this intersection, regarding executory contracts containing filed-rates, where the power struggle between the two exists.

An executory contract is a contract where both parties still have material obligations to perform under the contract. Filed-rates may …

The Elevation Of Reality Over Restraint In Dobbs V. Jackson Women’S Health Organization, Kevin C. Walsh

Scholarly Articles

No abstract provided.

The Curious Case Of Tort Liability For A Defective Product That The Defendant Did Not Make, Sell, Or Distribute, Marin Roger Scordato

Scholarly Articles

Rarely does the United States Supreme Court consider and decide an issue of tort law, especially one that does not implicate any aspect of federal constitutional law.

The problem of bare-metal equipment is just such an issue, taken up and addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court less than three years ago in the case of Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries. Despite the Court’s opinion, the question continues to generate different responses from state courts and fails to enjoy much accord or consensus at the state-law level, where it has the greatest practical impact. The problem presented to the …

The October 2021 Term And The Challenge To Progressive Constitutional Theory, J. Joel Alicea

Scholarly Articles

This Essay examines the ways in which the Supreme Court's October 2021 Term challenges core theoretical commitments of progressive constitutional theory. Progressive constitutional theory originated in the progressive political theory of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Accordingly, progressive constitutional theory shares progressive political theory's commitments to two propositions: rationalism and individualism. These commitments lead to an understanding of history as moving in a particular direction--one that is generally in line with progressive ideology. The originalist and traditionalist approaches of the Court's October 2021 decisions call into question the progressive confidence in the direction of history while simultaneously rejecting …

"Engines Of The Ruling Party": The Establishment Clause And The Power Politics Of "Managing Diversity", Robert A. Destro

Scholarly Articles

This Essay argues that the Supreme Court's Religion Clauses jurisprudence since Everson v. Board of Education is best understood as part of an ongoing effort by the Court to "manage" the racial, religious, and cultural politics of the nation. Since its infamous decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford, the Court's race and sex discrimination jurisprudence offers equally compelling examples of the ways in which the Justices have sought to sought to control-or "manage"- the racial, ethnic, and cultural composition of the nation's major culture-forming institutions (i.e., to "manage diversity"). Its Religion Clauses jurisprudence, by contrast, offers the clearest examples of …

The Originalist Jurisprudence Of Justice Samuel Alito, J. Joel Alicea

Scholarly Articles

Since Justice Alito’s appointment to the Supreme Court in 2006, constitutional theorists have struggled with how to characterize his approach to constitutional adjudication. Many scholars have argued that “Justice Alito is not to any significant extent an originalist” but is, instead, “a methodological pluralist” who uses both originalist and non-originalist tools of constitutional adjudication. Others have contended that “Justice Alito’s jurisprudence is originali[st], though not in the traditional sense.”

Personal Jurisdiction And The Fairness Factor(S), Megan La Belle

Scholarly Articles

It has been more than seventy-five years since the Supreme Court decided International Shoe Co. v. Washington, yet questions surrounding the personal jurisdiction doctrine loom large. Over the past decade, the Roberts Court has issued a handful of personal jurisdiction opinions, including Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court, a case decided in 2021 that addressed an issue related to specific jurisdiction. What is more, courts across the country, including several state supreme courts, have been grappling with the question whether a corporation’s registration to do business constitutes consent to personal jurisdiction in that state. This …

“Recommend . . . Measures”: A Textualist Reformulation Of The Major Questions Doctrine, Chad Squitieri

Scholarly Articles

Following Biden v. Nebraska, defenders of the major questions doctrine (which requires administrative agencies to identify “clear congressional authorization” to regulate “major” issues) can be categorized as falling within one of two camps. The first camp includes Justices Gorsuch and Alito, who view the major questions doctrine as a substantive canon. The second camp includes Justice Barrett, who explained in Nebraska that she is “wary” of adopting new substantive canons, and indicated that she considers the major questions doctrine to be a linguistic canon. Interestingly, both camps have relied on an influential scholar to advance their positions: then Professor …

Vested Patents And Equal Justice, Adam J. Macleod

Scholarly Articles

In a time of renewed interest in equal justice, the vested patent right may be timely again. Vested patent rights helped marginalized Americans to secure equal justice earlier in American history. And they helped to make sense of the law. Vested patent rights can perform those tasks again today. The concept of vested rights render patent law coherent. And it explains patent law 's interactions with other areas of law, such as property, administrative, and constitutional law. The vested rights doctrine also can serve the requirements of equal justice, as it has several times in American history. Vested rights secure …

Bad Faith Dismissals In Chapter 7, Myah Drouin

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) provides a fresh start to the “honest but unfortunate debtor.” Chapter 7 therefore permits a debtor to “discharge their outstanding debts in exchange for liquidating their nonexempt assets and distributing them to their creditors.” Dismissals in chapter 7 are governed by section 707 of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 707(a) governs all chapters of bankruptcy filings and applies when adequate “cause” is shown.

There is currently a circuit split regarding whether a debtor’s lack of good faith constitutes cause for dismissal under section 707(a). Under section 707(a), a case may …

The Dischargeability Of Money Judgements Versus Property Interests In Arbitration Awards For Domestic Contributions In The Context Of Unmarried Couples, Gabriella Hansen

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A debt which arises prior to the filing of the petition for discharge in bankruptcy is dischargeable unless it can be categorized as one of the statutory exceptions to discharge listed in section 523(a) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). Section 523(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code prohibits the discharge of awards of domestic support due to a debtor’s spouse, former spouse, or child. Accordingly, maintenance, alimony, and child support, often awarded in divorce proceedings, fall under the federal bankruptcy law statutory exceptions to discharge for domestic support obligations.

When an unmarried couple separates and …

Exceptions To The General Rule That The Automatic Stay Under Bankruptcy Code Section 362(A) Does Not Apply To Non-Debtors, Annmarie Gruick

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition, the automatic stay takes effect. “The automatic stay is one of the fundamental debtor protections provided by the bankruptcy laws. It gives the debtor a breathing spell from its creditors. It stops all collection efforts, all harassment, and all foreclosure actions. It permits the debtor to attempt a repayment or reorganization plan, or simply to be relieved of the financial pressures that drove him [or her] into bankruptcy.”

Section 362(a) enumerates eight (8) actions and activities from which the debtor is protected—“it does not protect separate legal entities, such as corporate directors, …

U.S. Trustee Fee Increase That Is Not Applicable Uniformly Violates The U.S. Constitution, Malorie Ruggeri

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 of the United States Constitution contains the “Bankruptcy Clause,” which vests Congress with the power to establish “uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States.” The clause’s requirement that the bankruptcy laws be “uniform” is not a strictly construed requirement as Congress reserves the right to draft legislation depending on different regional issues that arise within the bankruptcy system.

Congress created the United States Trustee Program (USTP) to, among other things, oversee the administration of bankruptcy cases and promote the integrity and efficiency of bankruptcy system for the benefit of …

The Application Of 11 U.S.C. § 523(A) To Subchapter V Corporate Debtors Under 11 U.S.C. § 1192(2), Elizabeth Allhusen

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a debtor can receive a fresh start through a broad discharge of its debts. The general availability of a discharge is limited by section 523(a). Section 523(a) provides that certain types of debts of an individual are excepted from discharge. Section 1192 applies these exceptions in certain small business bankruptcy cases.

In 2019, Congress created Subchapter V of the Bankruptcy Code with the passing of the Small Business Reorganization Act (“SBRA”). The SBRA added provisions to Chapter 11 which apply to small business debtors. Small business debtors, as …

Solvent Debtors Must Pay The Contractual Post-Petition Interest Rate On Unimpaired Claims, Rayla Aberman

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The default rule in bankruptcy law is that when a debtor files for bankruptcy, interest ceases to accrue on their unsecured claims. This general principle is subject to an exception known as the solvent debtor exception. Under this exception, solvent debtors are required to pay post-petition interest on their outstanding claims, even after filing for bankruptcy. Section 726(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code states that solvent debtors must pay interest at “the legal rate.” However, the Bankruptcy Code does not define what the legal rate is, and courts have disagreed over whether it applies to both impaired and unimpaired claimants. …

Exceptions To The Rule: When Non-Debtor Entities Are Protected By The Automatic Stay, Isabella Benchetrit

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In most cases, the automatic stay, under section 362 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"), stays all creditors from pursuing litigation against debtors. Nonetheless, non-debtor entities can obtain the protection afforded to debtors by the automatic stay in limited circumstances. There are two primary ways of staying litigation against a non-debtor. First, through demonstrating that there are exceptional circumstances to extend section 362 to a non-debtor. Second, through satisfying the standard for an injunction pursuant to section 105 of the Bankruptcy Code.

This Article considers the circumstances by which a non-debtor entity may receive …

Free And Clear Sale Under Section 363 Of The Bankruptcy Code Prevents Successor Liability, Matthew Bopp

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code allows a debtor to sell its assets free and clear of any interest in such property, pursuant to section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 363(f) is used to allow the trustee to sell assets not in the ordinary course of business and to allow purchasers to buy assets without the fear of liability. The Bankruptcy Code does not define the term “interest.” Thus, in interpreting section 363(f), a court must view interest in property expansively. Using section 363(f), courts have extinguished several types of claims and interest in property including: possessory interests, employment related claims, …

An Unincorporated Entity Will Be Unable To Recover As A Secured Creditor In Bankruptcy Unless A Court Invokes The Doctrines Of De Facto Corporation Or Corporation By Estoppel, Andrew Braverman

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under New York law, an entity that has failed to properly incorporate cannot assume liabilities or acquire rights. As a result, unincorporated entities will typically lack capacity to enter into contractual agreements. Within the context of bankruptcy, this may hinder a creditor’s ability to maximize its recovery.

A creditor that is adversely affected by a lack of corporate recognition will attempt to persuade a court to impose the doctrines of de facto corporation or corporation by estoppel. These doctrines, which are matters of state law, provide unincorporated entities with the rights and obligations that a legally recognized entity would …

Shared Responsibility Payment May Be A Tax Entitled To Priority Under The Bankruptcy Code, Ashton Bryan

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Patient Protection and Affordability Care Act ("ACA") provides that certain individuals must maintain minimum essential health insurance coverage throughout the year. If a person under the mandate fails to maintain the required insurance for one month or more, a shared responsibility payment ("SRP") is imposed on the taxpayer. The SRP is collected by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS").

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("TCJA") eliminated the individual mandate and reduced the SRP to zero for 2019 and thereafter. The SRPs for 2018 and prior years must be reported to the IRS on the applicable tax return. Otherwise, …

Trustee’S Broad Duty To Disclose Information To Interested Parties Under Section 704(A)(7) Of The Bankruptcy Code, Joel Cardoz

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A trustee has a duty to disclose information to interested parties upon request. Section 1109(b) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) includes creditors in the definition of interested parties. Trustees must obtain a court order to be excused from their duty to disclose.

A trustee’s duty of disclosure is “broad and extensive.” Courts are reluctant to excuse the trustee from their duty of disclosure unless the trustee points to a compelling “countervailing fiduciary duty … whose performance is more important than avoiding the harm resulting from withholding the information in question.”

First, this article …

Uncertainty Surrounding Takings Claimants’ Rights In Municipal Bankruptcies, Gillian Deery

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Governments in the United States and its territories have the power to exercise eminent domain so long as they provide property owners with the constitutionally guaranteed “just compensation.” The Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause specifically prescribes this remedy for parties whose property has been subject to a government taking. “Just compensation” has proven to be an issue in the context of bankruptcy, as bankruptcy law inherently allows debtors to alter their obligations to their creditors.

In response to Puerto Rico’s financial crisis, Congress enacted the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”), which created a modified version of …

Two Valid Approaches For Determining Whether “Taxes” Get Priority In Bankruptcy Cases, Jonathan Fuller

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In bankruptcies, tax status often effects whether claims are entitled to priority. Thus, debates about whether charges are penalties or taxes date back to the early twentieth century. In 1930, the Supreme Court established that courts are not bound to the characterization given to a charge by the municipality that created it. Rather, courts have a duty to consider the “real nature” and “effect” of the charge. Accordingly, different circuits have implemented different approaches to make these determinations.

This Article examines the ambiguity among circuits regarding charges’ “tax” status and resulting priority entitlement. Part I outlines In re Lorber …