Law Commons^™

U.S. Supreme Court Surveys: 2016 Term. Murr. V. Wisconsin: Identifying The Proper "Parcel As A Whole" In Regulatory Takings Cases, Bruce I. Kogan

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Deconstructing Sanctuary Cities: The Legality Of Federal Grant Conditions That Require State And Local Cooperation On Immigration Enforcement, Peter Margulies

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Klan's Constitution, Jared Goldstein

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Sky Is The Limit: Protecting Unaccompanied Minors By Not Subjecting Them To Numerical Limitations, Deborah Gonzalez

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

U.S. Supreme Court Surveys: 2016 Term. Matal V. Tam: Free Speech Meets "Disparaging" Trademarks In The Supreme Court, Niki Kuckes

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

United States Supreme Court Surveys: 2016 Term. Still Standing After All These Years: Five Decades Of Litigation Under The Fair Housing Act And The Supreme Court Still Can't Say For Sure Who Is Protected, David A. Logan

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Law Library Blog (January 2018): Legal Beagle's Blog Archive, Roger Williams University School Of Law

Law Library Newsletters/Blog

No abstract provided.

Vol. 23: No. 2 (Spring 2018) Masthead

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

The "Primary Purpose" Of Children's Advocacy Centers: How Ohio V. Clark Revolutionized Children's Hearsay, Andrew Lentz

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

R.I.P. To Rluipa: The Ongoing Debate Of Rluipa As Applied To Local Cemetery Ordinances Is Finally Laid To Rest, Alexandra C. Rawson

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Perpetual "Invasion": Past As Prologue In Constitutional Immigration Law, Matthew J. Lindsay

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Treason And Terror: A Toxic Brew, B. Mitchell Simpson Iii

Roger Williams University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Nation-States And Their Operations In Planting Of Malware In Other Countries: Is It Legal Under International Law, John J. Chung

Law Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Our Heroic Constitution?, Susan Herman

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Insuring Sustainable Homeownership, David Reiss

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The President's Immigration Courts, Catherine Y. Kim

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Front Matter

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Gaming The Law: Adolescents And The Harmful Digital Communication Act—Employing An Educational Approach, Nachshon Goltz, Giulia Dondoli

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

In 2015, the Parliament of New Zealand enacted the Harmful Digital Communication Act (HDCA) with the aim of eliminating harm caused by digital communications. After a year of HDCA’s partial enforcement, a relatively large number of cases under Section 22, which concerns harm caused by posting digital communication, have been filed. Under this section, anyone over the age of fourteen can potentially face sanctions, and the first person to be convicted under the Act was an eighteen-year-old. This article highlights the legal rights and obligations that adolescents need be aware of. It also presents an online game, “Privacy Games” at …

Predatory Innovation: The Definite Need For Legal Recognition, Thibault Schrepel

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Scraping The Bottom Of The Barrel: Why It Is No Surprise That Data Scrapers Can Have Access To Public Profiles On Linkedin, Marissa Boulanger

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Germline Editing: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back?, Kristina Smith

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

(Im)Perfect Regulation: Virtual Currency And Other Digital Assets As Collateral, Kristin Johnson, Sarah E. Hsu Wilbur, Stanley Sater

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Lessons From Case Study Of Secured Transactions With Bitcoin, Xuan-Thao Nguyen

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Telemedicine Is The New Narcotics Candy Store: Teladoc Opens The Floodgates For The Unrestricted Sale Of Dangerous Drugs, Madeleine Rosuck

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reliable Perfection Of Security Interests In Crypto-Currency, Ronald J. Mann

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Crypto-Collateral, Kevin V. Tu

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

The use of cryptocurrency has permeated new industries. As it does so, the need to confront the broader commercial law implications of cryptocurrency, particularly the applicability of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.), becomes more pronounced. For example, creditors and debtors increasingly use cryptocurrency as collateral. But Article 9 of the U.C.C. does not expressly mention cryptocurrency. Fortunately, Article 9 is flexible enough to accommodate the collateralization of cryptocurrency within its

currently defined collateral types. The foregoing, notwithstanding Article 9, could be amended to improve the functionality of Article 9 for those to engage in secured transactions with crypto-collateral. Rather than …

Alexa, Give My Personal Information To The Government: The Application Of The Third-Party Doctrine To Smart Devices, Brandon Pieratt

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mind The Gap: Supreme Court Contraction Of Legal Discretion For The Executive Branch, Steven Ferrey

Suffolk University Law School Faculty Works

The Supreme Court, for the first time, elevated economic calculation to function as the fulcrum leveraging and allocating law-making power between the branches of government.

The federal agency regulation before the Supreme Court was estimated by the agency to impose approximately $9.6 billion in costs annually on the U.S. economy, to realize direct public benefits of $4-5 million annually. This is approximately a 2,000:1 negative cost/direct benefit ratio, before counting indirect ‘co-benefits.’ There is now new pressure to “change the math” by which the agency performs the now-required cost consideration. Incidental ‘co-benefits,’ if allowed to be considered, change the result. …

The Cambridge Handbook On The Law Of The Sharing Economy, Nestor M. Davidson, Michèle Finck, John Infranca

Suffolk University Law School Faculty Works

This is a draft of the table of contents and introduction of the forthcoming Cambridge Handbook on the Law of the Sharing Economy (2018). The handbook grapples conceptually and practically with what the sharing economy – which includes entities ranging from large for- profit firms like Airbnb, Uber, Lyft, TaskRabbit, and Upwork to smaller, nonprofit collaborative initiatives – means for law, and how law, in turn, is shaping critical aspects of the sharing economy. Featuring a diverse set of contributors from multiple academic disciplines and countries, the book compiles the most important, up- to- date research on the regulation of …

Tax Law And The Eroding Budget Process, Rebecca M. Kysar

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.