Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 31 - 47 of 47

Full-Text Articles in Law

Cash Reporting, Neil E. Harl Feb 2017

Cash Reporting, Neil E. Harl

Neil E. Harl

The enactment of tighter reporting rules in 1990, the issuance of amended regulations, and the issuance of temporary regulations have modified the cash reporting requirements sufficiently to affect far more firms than was the case previously. The most significant expansion in scope of the requirement — the change in definition of "cash" — applies to amounts received on or after February 3, 1992.


Handling Commodity Futures Transactions, Neil E. Harl Feb 2017

Handling Commodity Futures Transactions, Neil E. Harl

Neil E. Harl

In the same manner as other merchants and manufacturers, farm and ranch taxpayers buy and sell commodity futures to hedge against fluctuating prices. Likewise, farm and ranch taxpayers buy and sell commodity futures as speculators. The principal matter of concern from an income tax perspective in the farm and ranch area is the line between hedging and speculation.


Generation Skipping—Planning Principles, Neil E. Harl Feb 2017

Generation Skipping—Planning Principles, Neil E. Harl

Neil E. Harl

For may farm and ranch families, generation skipping is not part of their estate plans. However, for those wishing to limit the right of one or more succeeding generations to manage the property or the right to dispose of the property, generation skipping may figure into the estate planning effort. For the latter group, several additional guidelines or planning principles should be considered.


Eligibility For Medicaid Benefits, The "Assets" Test, Neil E. Harl Feb 2017

Eligibility For Medicaid Benefits, The "Assets" Test, Neil E. Harl

Neil E. Harl

Few topics merit the attention now being focused on health care. While there is major concern about the cost of health insurance and health care costs, many older individuals are deeply concerned about nursing home costs and have seen the estates of friends or relatives reduced sharply by such expenses.

Some are tempted to attempt to plan their estates deliberately to qualify for Title XIX Medicaid benefits for health care. This article discusses briefly the rules governing Title XIX eligibility.


Generation Skipping—Transfers Subject To Tax, Neil E. Harl Feb 2017

Generation Skipping—Transfers Subject To Tax, Neil E. Harl

Neil E. Harl

For centuries, generation skipping has been utilized by wealthy property owners and those lacking confidence in succeeding generations to manage and conserve family wealth, at least to the extent allowed by the rule against perpetuities. Until 1976, the U.S. federal estate and gift tax system did not take particular note of generation skipping as property owners were free to establish generation skipping arrangements with the usual federal estate or gift tax consequences as to the transferor, but with no further transfer tax consequence until gift by or death of the holders of the remainder interest. The Tax Reform Act of …


Generation Skipping—The $1 Million Exemption, Neil E. Harl Feb 2017

Generation Skipping—The $1 Million Exemption, Neil E. Harl

Neil E. Harl

For most farm and ranch families, the most significant feature of the generation skipping transfer tax (GSTT) is the $1 million exemption per transferor. An exemption of $2 million was available through 1989 for transfers to grandchildren.


Capitalizing Preproductive Period Expenditures, Neil Harl Feb 2017

Capitalizing Preproductive Period Expenditures, Neil Harl

Neil E. Harl

Few have forgotten the provision in the Tax Reform Act of 1986 requiring the capitalization of preproductive period expenditures for animals or crops having a preproductive period of more than two years. The provision was repealed as to animals in the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988. However, problems may now be encountered by those who elected out of the provision before 1989.


Divisive Corporate Reorganizations, Neil E. Harl Feb 2017

Divisive Corporate Reorganizations, Neil E. Harl

Neil E. Harl

Repeal of the more favorable corporate liquidation options in 1986 and the expiration of the phase-out for small corporations at the end of 1988 have narrowed the range of workable choices for dealing with corporations that have outlived their usefulness. One possibility, for those motivated by a desire to separate shareholders who prefer not to be associated together any longer in the same corporation, is a divisive, type D, corporate reorganization.


Cash Accounting For Farm And Ranch Corporations, Neil E. Harl Feb 2017

Cash Accounting For Farm And Ranch Corporations, Neil E. Harl

Neil E. Harl

As a new taxpayer, a farm or ranch corporation may elect the cash or accrual methods of accounting if the corporate books are so kept and the method clearly reflects income. Indeed, IRS has ruled that a corporation may report on the cash method of accounting even though books are kept on the accrual method if the corporation maintains work papers reconciling accrual method book income to cash method taxable income. The method of accounting should be elected clearly on the initial corporate income tax return.


Cautionary Note On Scin's, Neil Harl Feb 2017

Cautionary Note On Scin's, Neil Harl

Neil E. Harl

The concept of self-cancelling installment notes or SCIN's grew out of a 1980 Tax Court decision holding that an arrangement involving the cancellation at the death of the seller of the remaining payments due on an installment obligation would not be treated as a transfer with a retained life estate. The publication in 1986 of Rev. Rul. 86-723 essentially validated the concept and provided guidelines for classifying arrangements as private annuities, SCIN's or conventional installment sales. Since 1986, SCIN's have come to be viewed as a useful planning device in some settings. In particular, many view SCIN's as superior to …


Funding Revocable Living Trusts, Neil E. Harl Feb 2017

Funding Revocable Living Trusts, Neil E. Harl

Neil E. Harl

Without much doubt, the transfer of assets to the trust is the most critical part of the formation of a revocable living trust. Inasmuch as all of the grantor's property should be conveyed to the trust, the obvious question is whether the transfer triggers adverse consequences to the grantor. In general, conveyance of property to a revocable inter vivos trust can be accomplished without negative consequences but the property inventory should be subjected to an itemby- item review before the actual transfer occurs. Here are the major points to consider.


Forgiving Principal In A Purchase Price Reduction, Neil E. Harl Feb 2017

Forgiving Principal In A Purchase Price Reduction, Neil E. Harl

Neil E. Harl

For purchasers of property unable to make payments as required by the obligation, a purchase price reduction may be a possible solution. If the debt of an original purchaser of property is reduced by the original seller of the property, the adjustment is treated as a purchase price adjustment and not as a discharge of indebtedness if the debtor is solvent.


Avoiding Self-Employment Tax, Neil Harl Feb 2017

Avoiding Self-Employment Tax, Neil Harl

Neil E. Harl

Two recent private letter rulings issued about a month apart in late 1991 have provided additional guidance on the IRS national office position on two of the strategies used to avoid self-employment tax. In both rulings, the IRS position was adverse to the taxpayers.


Claiming Motor Vehicle Deductions, Neil Harl Feb 2017

Claiming Motor Vehicle Deductions, Neil Harl

Neil E. Harl

A taxpayer may, on a yearly basis, deduct an amount equal to either (1) the business standard mileage rate (at 28 cents per mile for all business miles for 1992) times the number of business miles traveled or (2) the actual costs (both operating and fixed) paid or incurred by the taxpayer allocable to business miles.


A Better Calculus For Regulators: From Cost-Benefit Analysis To The Social Welfare Function, Matthew D. Adler Jan 2017

A Better Calculus For Regulators: From Cost-Benefit Analysis To The Social Welfare Function, Matthew D. Adler

Faculty Scholarship

The “social welfare function” (SWF) is a powerful tool that originates in theoretical welfare economics and has wide application in economic scholarship, for example in optimal tax theory and environmental economics. This Article provides a comprehensive introduction to the SWF framework. It then shows how the SWF framework can be used as the basis for regulatory policy analysis, and why it improves upon cost-benefit analysis (CBA).

Two types of SWFs are especially plausible: the utilitarian SWF, which sums individual well-being numbers, and the prioritarian SWF, which gives extra weight to the well-being of the worse off. Either one of these …


The Economic Foundation Of The Dormant Commerce Clause, Michael S. Knoll, Ruth Mason Jan 2017

The Economic Foundation Of The Dormant Commerce Clause, Michael S. Knoll, Ruth Mason

All Faculty Scholarship

Last Term, a sharply divided Supreme Court decided a landmark dormant Commerce Clause case, Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne. Wynne represents the Court’s first clear acknowledgement of the economic underpinnings of one of its main doctrinal tools for resolving tax discrimination cases, the internal consistency test. In deciding Wynne, the Court relied on economic analysis we provided. This Essay explains that analysis, why the majority accepted it, why the dissenters’ objections to the majority’s reasoning miss their mark, and what Wynne means for state taxation. Essential to our analysis and the Court’s decision in Wynne …


Partial Takings, Abraham Bell, Gideon Parchomovsky Jan 2017

Partial Takings, Abraham Bell, Gideon Parchomovsky

All Faculty Scholarship

Partial takings allow the government to expropriate the parts of an asset it needs, leaving the owner the remainder. Both vital and common, partial takings present unique challenges to the standard rules of eminent domain. Partial takings may result in the creation of suboptimal, and even unusable, parcels. Additionally, partial takings create assessment problems that do not arise when parcels are taken as a whole. Finally, partial takings engender opportunities for inefficient strategic behavior on the part of the government after the partial taking has been carried out. Current jurisprudence fails to resolve these problems and can even exacerbate them. …