Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- State and Local Government Law (41)
- Administrative Law (39)
- Natural Resources Law (39)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (39)
- Family Law (2)
-
- Law and Race (2)
- Property Law and Real Estate (2)
- Animal Law (1)
- Animal Studies (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Estates and Trusts (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Land Use Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Gender (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Remedies (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Torts (1)
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 46 of 46
Full-Text Articles in Law
Appeal No. 0885: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0885: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0881: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0881: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0883: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0883: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0887: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0887: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0886: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0886: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0871: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0871: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0875: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0875: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0880: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0880: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0879: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0879: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0874: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0874: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0863: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0863: Stonebridge Operating Co., Llc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Orders 2014-39 (suspension of operations); 2014-236, 2014-238,2014-239, 2014-241 (denials of plug-back permits); 2014-253, 2014-256 thru 2014-262 & 2014-264 thru 2014-266 (plug orders)
Appeal No. 0905: Virginia Ohio Oil Company, Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0905: Virginia Ohio Oil Company, Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2015-43; William Hartley #1 Well
Appeal No. 0892: R.E. Disposal, Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0892: R.E. Disposal, Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2014-421
Impunity In Tamir Rice Killing Intensifies Demands For Systemic Reform, Lauren Carasik
Impunity In Tamir Rice Killing Intensifies Demands For Systemic Reform, Lauren Carasik
Media Presence
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments: Are Land Contracts Preying On Low-Income Buyers Or Do They Offer A Different Avenue For Home Ownership?, Christopher Barron
Recent Developments: Are Land Contracts Preying On Low-Income Buyers Or Do They Offer A Different Avenue For Home Ownership?, Christopher Barron
University of Baltimore Journal of Land and Development
As of May 2016, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has announced an investigation into the practice of land contracts and compliance with federal truth and lending laws. The CFPB’s investigation is in response to the increasing number of reports from organizations, such as the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC), condemning land contracts for their predatory nature and disparate impact on low-income buyers, specifically those of color. Furthermore, land contracts have been labeled as “Wall Street’s Toxic Transactions” because of large wall street investment groups utilizing them for their own capital gain. Land contracts have been vilified for luring unsuspecting …
Living With Owning, Matt Ampleman, Douglas A. Kysar
Living With Owning, Matt Ampleman, Douglas A. Kysar
Indiana Law Journal
In October, 2011, Terry Thompson committed suicide by gunshot after cutting open the cages of fifty-six exotic animals on his farm in Zanesville, Ohio. Fearing for pub-lic safety, law enforcement officers systematically hunted down the escaped animals in an episode that garnered international attention and prompted renewed discus-sion of the propriety of exotic animal ownership. This Article retells and discusses the circumstances surrounding Terry Thompson’s unhinging, applying frameworks of legal theory, chiefly in the realm of property law, to assess the fabric that held Thompson’s delicate system together and the tensions that led to its unravelling. As an autopsy, the …