Law Commons^™

Ensuring Protection Of Juveniles' Rights: A Better Way Of Obtaining A Voluntary Miranda Waiver, Yekaterina Berkovich

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

Part I provides background information about the evolution of judicial treatment of juveniles and the admissibility of confessions. Part II analyzes the different approaches applied by federal and state courts to determine whether a juvenile's waiver of rights was voluntary and examines the flaws in those approaches. Part III proposes a new approach to remedy the problems courts have faced with the existing approaches and to provide consistent outcomes at the federal level.

"Membership In A Particular Social Group": Why United States Courts Should Adopt The Disjunctive Approach Of The United Nations High Commissioner For Refugees, Hannah Mccuiston

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This Note calls for the adoption of the Guidelines on International Protection of the UNHCR in defining "membership in a particular social group" under the Refugee Act of 1980. Part I discusses the United States' obligations under the Convention and Protocol, and the process by which these obligations were incorporated into domestic law with the enactment of the Refugee Act of 1980. Part I also demonstrates how deviation from the United States' international obligations led to the circuit split. Part II outlines the views adopted by circuits on both sides of the split. Part III asserts that circuit courts …

Autism And The Criminal Defendant, Christine N. Cea

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

Part I discusses autism spectrum disorders, including the diagnosis and characteristics of autism, and whether autism is linked to criminal behavior. Part II examines whether autism should be an affirmative defense to a crime, and concludes that it should not. However, Part II does propose that autism should be an affirmative defense to specific minor crimes. Part III analyzes potential prejudicial demeanor evidence that might occur when autistic defendants testify in their own defense at a trial. This Part argues that evidence of autism should be admitted in a trial to explain to the jury why an autistic individual …

Rule 55: Why Broadly Interpreting "Otherwise Defend" Protects A Diligent Party's Rights And Encourages An Orderly And Efficient Judicial System, Jessica Ruoff

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This Note argues that a uniform interpretation of "otherwise defend" is needed. Part I of this Note discusses the history and purpose of Rule 55, the procedure for entries of default and default judgment, and other alternatives to Rule 55 default judgments. Part II of this Note examines how the language "otherwise defend" has been interpreted differently by the federal circuit courts. Part III of this Note argues that the majority's broad interpretation of "otherwise defend" should be adopted as the uniform interpretation because it is supported by statutory interpretation and the underlying purpose of Rule 55.

Broader Is Better: How Courts Should Determine Whether Or Not An Allegation Of Fraud Falls Under The Preemption Provision Of The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act, Jennifer Rose Roeske

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This Note argues that the correct approach for interpreting the scope of SLUSA's preemption language is the "literalist" approach taken by the Sixth Circuit. Part I of this Note lays out the legal framework of the Reform Act of 1995, Congress's intent in enacting the legislation, and the unintended consequences that flowed from the PSLRA's heightened pleading requirements. Part I also discusses SLUSA, what led to its passage, and its preemption language. Additionally, it looks at the Supreme Court's interpretation of preemption statutes generally, as well as the Supreme Court's broad interpretation of SLUSA in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner …

Protecting American Innovators By Combating The Decline Of Patents Granted To Small Entities, W. Keith Robinson

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

Part I of this Article discusses the current state of the U.S. patent system and reviews some of the challenges entrepreneurs and small entities face regarding patenting their inventions. Part II reviews some patent reform proposals and existing programs and discusses their impact on small entities. Part III highlights the current USPTO examination programs and discusses the effectiveness of the various programs. Part IV sets forth the proposed program, prioritizing a select number of patent applications where the inventor is an entrepreneur or small entity. The Article concludes in Part V, which suggests how patent stakeholders, including the USPTO, …

Of Third-Party Bathwater: How To Throw Out The Third-Party Doctrine While Preserving Government's Ability To Use Secret Agents, Amy L. Peikoff

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

In Part I of this Article, I discuss the third-party doctrine, including its history, the types of cases to which it has been applied, and arguments in favor of and against it, with particular focus on Orin Kerr's defense of the doctrine. In Part II, I propose an alternative-and, I think, better-way of dealing with cases typically thought to fall under this doctrine. My proposal, as we will see, rests upon the model for the legal protection of privacy that I have elucidated and defended in prior articles: a model based on our rights to property and contract. Finally, …

Islamic Commercial Law And Social Justice: Shari'ah-Compliant Companies, Workers' Rights, And The Living Wage, Susan C. Hascall

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

The purpose of this Article is to examine workers' rights under Islamic law. Companies claiming to be in compliance with the Islamic Shari'ah must look beyond the forms of the transactions and the content of the products they sell. The companies and their Shari'ah advisors must also examine the treatment of the workers employed by the companies. If the workers are not being treated fairly, in accordance with Islamic law, the owners of these companies and their Shari'ah advisors should not claim that the companies and their products are Shari'ah-compliant. As this Article shows, the fair treatment of …

Asf Response To Requests For Admission And Iterrogatories Related To Fr. Sabine Griego, Hall & Monagle, Llc

Timelines

No abstract provided.

Brooke Robinson, Petitioner - Appellant, Vs. Juan Pablo Matas-Vidal, Respondent - Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019)

APPEAL FROM THE FINAL ORDER OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF UTAH COUNTY, THE HONORABLE CHRISTINE S. JOHNSON

Utah Physicians For A Healthy Environment And Friends Of Great Salt Lake, Petitioners/ Appellants, V. Executive Director Of The Utah Department Of Environment Al Quality, Et Al. , Respondents/ Appellees., Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019)

Appeal from the Final Order of the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Executive director Amanda Smith

Sheila G. Winkler, Appellant V. Workforce Appeals Board Of The Utah Department Of Workforce Services, And Salt Lake City Corp., Appellees, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019)

Petition for Review of a Decision of the Workforce Appeals Board of the Department of Workforce Services State of Utah

Rocky Mountain Builders Supply, Inc., Dba Ck Builders Plaintiff/ Appellant, V. Steve Marks, Defendant/ Appellee., Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019)

Appeal from Order of Dismissal of the Fourth District Court, Utah County The Honorable Samuel Mc Vey, District Court Judge, Presiding District Court Case

No Country For Old Men?: The Non-Preclusive Effect Of The Age Discrimination In Employment Act On § 1983 Age Discrimination Claims, Lauren Tauro

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This Note argues that the ADEA should not be interpreted to preclude § 1983 constitutional claims for age discrimination in employment. Part I of this Note discusses the history and development of the statutory schemes that provide protection for employees against age discrimination in the workplace: § 1983 of the Civil Rights Act and the ADEA. Part II reviews relevant case law explaining the arguments for and against § 1983 preclusion to illustrate the interaction between § 1983 and the ADEA. Finally, Part III provides an equitable approach for courts to use to analyze § 1983 claims for age …

Single, Young Female - Seeking Asylum: The Struggles Victims Of Sex Trafficking Face Under Current United States Refugee Law, Diana Squillante

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This Note argues that the IJ, the BIA, and the circuit courts got it wrong. The courts reject creating a category representing young women in fear of being forced into prostitution because they feel it is too broad and does not establish a common characteristic. However, due to the courts' analyses' inconsistencies with the initiatives of the United Nations ("UN") and the United States to prevent and put an end to sex trafficking, a new analysis should be conducted to fulfill this goal.

Reconciling The Sex Offender Registration Act And The Family Court Act: Why The New York Legislature Should Allow Consideration Of Prior Juvenile Delinquency Adjudications In Sora Risk Level Determinations, Samuel J. Bazian

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This Note argues that advisory boards should not be prevented from considering juvenile delinquency proceedings in determining an adult offender's risk level. While one of the FCA's goals is to protect children from the stigma associated with a criminal conviction, the harm caused by the blanket prohibition against disclosing an offender's juvenile delinquency history outweighs its benefits. That is, despite the legislature's mandate that a juvenile's records be kept confidential, it is nonetheless time to revisit that decision. As currently constituted, the FCA adversely affects the ability of officials to make appropriate recommendations for the safety of the community. …

The Shortcomings Of New York's Long-Arm Statute: Defamation In The Age Of Technology, Robert D. Nussbaum

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This Note suggests that the New York legislature amend New York's long-arm statute so that it no longer excludes the tort of defamation as a basis for long-arm jurisdiction. Part I provides a brief background and history of jurisdiction and longarm statutes in general. It also focuses on New York's statute more specifically. Part II focuses on the arguments for excluding acts of defamation from long-arm jurisdiction and compares New York's statute to those of other states. Finally, Part III examines the different policy reasons for changing the statute and argues that such a change will not offend Due …

Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude: In Search Of A Moral Approach To Immoral Crimes, Patrick J. Campbell

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This Note seeks to demonstrate that the term "moral turpitude" is sufficiently ambiguous to warrant judicial deference to the Attorney General's opinion in Silva-Trevino. Part I explains the origins of "crimes involving moral turpitude" as grounds for removal and inadmissibility, and how courts have historically defined which crimes fit within this category. Even though courts do not dispute the general definition of moral turpitude, this Note explains how legislation that centers on subjective issues like morality is inherently ambiguous. Part II explains the shortfalls of the approach derived from case law prior to Silva-Trevino, largely because of …

Business And Commercial Litigation In Federal Courts (3d Ed.), Edited By Robert L. Haig, James M. Wicks

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

The BCL is comprehensive, up-to-date, and very user-friendly. The practice aids, strategic considerations, checklists, and forms all make this set of books a "must-have" for every business litigator who is or will be going to federal court. Even as law libraries seem to be moving toward cutting book subscriptions, if one were to subscribe to only a single set of practice-based books, this should be it.

Fragmenting The Community: Immigration Enforcement And The Unintended Consequences Of Local Police Non-Cooperation Policies, Natashia Tidwell

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

Part I traces the historical roots of the relationship between local police and federal immigration authorities, beginning with the changes in enforcement strategy precipitated by the September 11, 2001 attacks and leading up to the launch of S-Comm. The federal government's increased reliance on local police to supplement its internal enforcement efforts has raised several Tenth Amendment concerns as the states struggle to define the proper scope of their "inherent authority" to act in immigration matters, with officials in some so-called sanctuary cities insisting that their inherent authority to enforce federal immigration law is commensurate with the sovereign right …

Payment Systems, Consumer Tragedy, And Ineffective Remedies, Marc L. Roark

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This Article engages how those social considerations interact with commercial contracting principles and payments policies to recommend an over-arching narrative of fairness. At the core is the desire to create balance amongst the competing interests, while recognizing the role that risk and access should play in defining the legal remedies available to consumers. To do so, the Article attempts to understand the competing interests represented by different constituents of SVPs, including consumers and merchants. In particular, the Article attempts to tell a story of two different types of consumers. The first is one whom we might not care much …

The Community Reinvestment Act: Guilty, But Not As Charged, Raymond H. Brescia

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

With the goals of assessing the state of the research on the CRA and drawing some insights into what reforms this research suggests, this Article proceeds as follows. Part I provides an overview of the CRA's structure and reach. Part II provides an overview of the impact of the financial crisis on low- and moderate-income communities, particularly communities of color. Part III assesses the current state of the research, with particular emphasis on the NBER report described above. Part IV identifies the disconnect between the CRA's reach and its goals given the current state of banking and makes suggestions …

They Promised To Leave Us Some Of Our Land: Aboriginal Title In Canada's Maritime Provinces, Robert Colin Hamilton

LLM Theses

This thesis analyzes the status of Aboriginal title in Canada's Maritime Provinces in light of the Supreme Court of Canada's historic declaration of Aboriginal title in the 2014 decision of Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia. This thesis argues that, in light of the clarified legal principles articulated by the Court, it is very likely that Aboriginal title can be proven to have existed in the Maritime Provinces. In light of this conclusion, the inquiry then shift to whether that title was legally extinguished. The legal parameters of the extinguishment question are surveyed in considerable detail and it is concluded that …

Raser Technologies Order On Defendants' Motion To Temporarily Stay Proceedings Pending A Related U.S Supreme Court Decision, John J. Goger

Superior Court of Fulton County: Metro Atlanta Business Case Division Opinions

No abstract provided.

Volume 89, Issue 5 (2015)

Obiter Dicta

No abstract provided.

Elizabeth Macfarlane, Plaintiff/Appellant, Vs. Applebee's Restaurant, American Fork Applette Llc, John D. Prince, And John Does 1 Through 5, Defendant/Appellee, Utah Court Of Appeals

Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (2007– 2019)

Appeal from a summary Judgement entered by the Fourth Judicial District Court Utah County, State of Utah, Judge Fred Howard

Newsroom: Lgbt Equality: The Challenges Ahead, Roger Williams University School Of Law

Life of the Law School (1993- )

No abstract provided.

Trending @ Rwu Law: Christopher Gerlica's Post: Beyond Same-Sex Marriage, Christopher Gerlica

Law School Blogs

No abstract provided.

Defending Daubert: It's Time To Amend Federal Rule Of Evidence 702, David E. Bernstein, Eric G. Lasker

William & Mary Law Review

The 2000 amendments to Rule 702 sought to resolve the debate that had emerged in the courts in the 1990s over the proper meaning of Daubert by codifying the rigorous and structured approach to expert admissibility announced in the Daubert trilogy. Fifteen years later, however, the amendments have only partially accomplished this objective. Many courts continue to resist the judiciary’s proper gatekeeping role, either by ignoring Rule 702’s mandate altogether or by aggressively reinterpreting the Rule’s provisions.

Informed by this additional history of recalcitrance, the time has come for the Judicial Conference to return to the drafting table and finish …

Basing Budget Baselines, David Kamin

William & Mary Law Review

Measuring the cost of legislation or even projecting the course of the federal budget requires defining a budget baseline—a starting point capturing the current state of the budget. Budget baselines underlie most measures employed in federal budget debates and enforcement rules. Yet, despite their widespread use, budget baselines engender considerable confusion and abuse.

For instance, when legislators enact temporary tax breaks, the breaks are officially estimated to cost far less than they likely will because of a loophole in federal budget baseline rules. Then, later efforts to extend the tax cuts are counted as increasing deficits when, in fact, by …