Law Commons^™

Practical Reasonableness And Mental Health Alternatives To Incarceration, Colleen Kelly Faherty

Student Works

No abstract provided.

Using Forensic Ballistics In The Courtroom, Jeremy R. Dack

Student Works

No abstract provided.

Expert Witness, Anthony A. Graff

Student Works

No abstract provided.

Admitting The Problem With The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, Andrew Logan Tobel

Student Works

No abstract provided.

Party Crashers, Alexandra C. Smith

Student Works

No abstract provided.

Prostitution In The United States, Abdul Nasser Hamdan

Student Works

No abstract provided.

The Concerted Protected Activity Loophole: How The Nlrb Is Undermining The Federal Policy Favoring Arbitration By Invalidating Class Action Waivers, Thomas E. Robins

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Timor-Leste V. Australia: "Guerrilla Tactics" And Schoolyard Bullies In State Arbitration, Sarah Whittington

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Could Commercial Arbitration Help Settle A Historic Conflict Between The Israelites And Palestinians?, Evan Goldsmith

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

International Commercial Arbitration In Central Asia, W. E. Butler

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Ebay's De Facto Low Value High Volume Resolution Process: Lessons And Best Practices For Odr Systems Designers, Louis F. Del Duca, Colin Rule, Kathryn Rimpfel

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Too Darn Bad: How The Supreme Court's Class Arbitration Jurisprudence Has Undermined Arbitration, Adam Raviv

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Mediator Ethical Breaches: Implications For Public Policy, Sharon Press

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

Adr And The Extraction Of Coal Bed Methane From Split-Ownership Estates, Alyssa Looney

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

"Prepare For Trouble, And Make It Double": The Fourth Circuit Continues Downward Iteration Of Duplicitous Test For Manifest Disregard, Garrett Lent

Arbitration Law Review (2009 - Present)

No abstract provided.

The Adoption Of Children In Judaism And In Israel; A Conceptual And Practical Review, Mark Goldfeder

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

Religion has played a fairly significant role in the history of adoption law, both in the U.S. and internationally. Although there are plenty of questions raised by religion in the context of adoption, one particular issue revolves around whether or not religion should factor into a "best interests of the child" placement determination. Whether or not it should factor into the determination, in practice religion often plays a part in the legal determination of which home will provide the best and most supportive environment for an adopted child. While much has been written about the legal aspect of putting a …

Asbestos Lawsuits In Russia: Bring One If You Can, Anna Linetskaya

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note examines the challenges faced by asbestos victims in Russia in seeking legal redress, highlighting the barriers posed by the country's legal system, lack of regulatory oversight, and the dominance of the asbestos industry. It argues that despite the existence of tort law as a potential avenue for relief, numerous structural and procedural obstacles deter victims from pursuing claims, underscoring the need for legal reforms to improve access to justice.

Biased? Prove It: Addressing Arbitrator Bias And The Merits Of Implementing Broad Disclosure Standards, Lindsay Melworm

Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law

The note examines the varying disclosure requirements for arbitrators in the United States and internationally, focusing on the standards for determining when an arbitral award may be vacated due to arbitrator partiality or bias. It highlights the tension between ensuring impartiality and maintaining the finality of arbitration decisions, advocating for broad initial disclosures to uphold the integrity and fairness of the process while preserving party autonomy.

Forfeiture Of Illegal Gains, Attempts And Implied Risk Preferences, Murat C. Mungan, Jonathan Klick

Scholarly Publications

In the law enforcement literature there is a presumption—supported by some experimental and econometric evidence—that criminals are more responsive to increases in the certainty than the severity of punishment. Under a general set of assumptions, this implies that criminals are risk seeking. We show that this implication is no longer valid when forfeiture of illegal gains and the possibility of unsuccessful attempts are considered. Therefore, when drawing inferences concerning offenders’ attitudes toward risk based on their responses to various punishment schemes, special attention must be paid to whether and to what extent offenders’ illegal gains can be forfeited and whether …

Redesigning The Science Court, Justin Sevier

Scholarly Publications

Scientific evidence is a field in crisis. The validity and reliability of forensic techniques have been criticized by nearly every actor in the legal community—by attorneys, judges, the legal academy, and even the National Academy of Sciences—and high-profile cases of scientific evidence gone awry have garnered national attention. Policymakers have suggested many solutions to the scientific evidence crisis, including a controversial proposal to remove complex scientific cases from state and federal dockets and to hear those cases instead in a specialized “science court.”

Science court proposals face one substantial hurdle: they have become exceedingly unpopular. But …

The Spending Power And Environmental Law After Sebelius, Erin Ryan

Scholarly Publications

This article analyzes the Supreme Court’s new spending power doctrine and its impact on state-federal bargaining in programs of cooperative federalism, using the laboratory of environmental law. (It expands on the legal analysis in an Issue Brief originally published by the American Constitution Society on Oct. 1, 2013.) After the Supreme Court ruled in the highly charged Affordable Care Act case of 2012, National Federation of Independent Business vs. Sebelius, the political arena erupted in debate over the implications for the health reform initiative and, more generally, the reach of federal law. Analysts fixated on the decision’s dueling Commerce Clause …

La Tirania De La Invisibilidad: La Necesidad De Reconocer Y Analizar La Violencia De Genero En La Argentina, Laura Mallison

Scripps Senior Theses

This thesis examines gender violence in Argentina in the context of the historic continuum of gender inequality, with a more in-depth analysis of gender violence during the 1976-1983 dictatorship. I argue that gender violence is perpetuated and normalized by its lack of recognition as a political issue with ramifications extending to daily life. I use the construction of a collective memory of the Dictatorship as a framework for making the intricacies of gender violence more visible and provide a detailed analysis of two laws against gender violence to demonstrate its systematic nature. Ultimately, laws are not sufficient to address such …

Best Interests Of The Child Principle In The Context Of Parent Separation Or Divorce : As Conceptualised By The Community, Nadia Dias

Theses: Doctorates and Masters

Best interests of the child (BIC) is a construct that is central to legal decisions in several areas including parenting matters in the Family Courts, guardianship, child-protection, and adoption. Despite the centrality of the construct, BIC has not been operationalised (Thomson & Molloy, 2001) and there is little agreement about what is considered best for children within social service and legal communities (Banach, 1998). Given that one of the aims of law is to reflect public sentiment (Green, 1996), the current study explored the general public’s conceptualisation of BIC. More specifically, I sought to determine what community members think the …

What Went Wrong: Prudent Management Of Endowment Funds And Imprudent Endowment Investing Policies, James J. Fishman

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

Most colleges and universities of all sizes have an endowment, a fund that provides a stream of income and maintains the corpus of the fund in perpetuity. Organizations with large endowments, such as colleges, universities, and private foundations, all finance a significant part of their operations through the return received from the investment of this capital. This article examines the legal framework for endowment investing, endowment investing policies, their evolution to more sophisticated and riskier strategies, and the consequences evinced during the financial crisis of 2008 and beyond. It traces the approaches to endowment investing and chronicles the rise and, …

Horton The Elephant Interprets The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure: How The Federal Courts Sometimes Do And Always Should Understand Them, Donald L. Doernberg

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

In Shady Grove, the Court considered whether a federal class action was maintainable in a diversity case where state law forbade class actions. The justices were sharply split into shifting majorities. One majority concluded that Rule 23 was not substantive for REA purposes and that it applied, but its members could not agree on why. Four justices thought it was proper to look only at the Federal Rule in question to see whether it addressed substance or procedure on its face. A different majority supported an approach to REA questions that required evaluating state law to determine whether the Federal …

Conferring Dignity: The Metamorphosis Of The Legal Homosexual, Noa Ben-Asher

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

The legal homosexual has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past three decades, culminating in United States v. Windsor, which struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). In 1986, the homosexual was a sexual outlaw beyond the protection of the Constitution. By 2013, the homosexual had become part of a married couple that is “deemed by the State worthy of dignity.” This Article tells the story of this metamorphosis in four phases. In the first, the “Homosexual Sodomite Phase,” the United States Supreme Court famously declared in Bowers v. Hardwick that there was no right to …

The Charter Of The Forest: Evolving Human Rights In Nature, Nicholas A. Robinson

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

Carta de Foresta, the Charter of the Forest of 1217, is among the first statutes in environmental law of any nation. Crafted to reform patently unjust governance of natural resources in 13th century England, the Charter of the Forest became a framework through which to reconcile competing environmental claims, then and into the future. The Charter confirmed the rights of “free men.” Kings resisted conceding these rights. When confronted with violation of the Charter, barons and royal councils obliged kings repeatedly to reissue the Forest Charter and pledge anew to obey its terms.

Weather Permitting: Incrementalism, Animus, And The Art Of Forecasting Marriage Equality After U.S. V. Windsor, Jeremiah A. Ho

Cleveland State Law Review

Within LGBT rights, the law is abandoning essentialist approaches toward sexual orientation by incrementally de-regulating restrictions on identity expression of sexual minorities. Simultaneously, same-sex marriages are become increasingly recognized on both state and federal levels. This Article examines the Supreme Court’s recent decision, U.S. v. Windsor, as the latest example of these parallel journeys. By overturning DOMA, Windsor normatively revises the previous incrementalist theory for forecasting marriage equality’s progress studied by William Eskridge, Kees Waaldijk, and Yuval Merin. Windsor also represents a moment where the law is abandoning antigay essentialism by using animusfocused jurisprudence for lifting the discrimination against the …

Dark Sarcasm In The Classroom: The Failure Of The Courts To Recognize Students' Severe Emotional Harm As Unconstitutional, Emily F. Suski

Cleveland State Law Review

Sometimes the very people who are supposed to teach, nurture, and protect students in public schools—the students’ teachers, principals, coaches, and other school officials—are instead the people who harm them. Public school officials have beaten students, causing significant physical harm. They have also left students suffering from depression, suicidal ideation, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. When school officials cause such severe harm to students, all the federal courts of appeals to consider the issue have concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment at least in theory protects them, regardless of whether the form of the harm is emotional or physical. Yet, an analysis …

Table Of Contents, Cleveland State Law Review

Cleveland State Law Review

No abstract provided.