Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Property Law and Real Estate (23)
- Environmental Law (9)
- Banking and Finance Law (8)
- Land Use Law (7)
- Law and Society (6)
-
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Courts (4)
- Law and Economics (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Natural Resources Law (4)
- Secured Transactions (4)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Legislation (3)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Civil Law (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Commercial Law (2)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Consumer Protection Law (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Economics (2)
- Family Law (2)
- Housing Law (2)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (2)
- Judges (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Institution
- Publication
-
- David J Reiss (8)
- Michael E Lewyn (5)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir (2)
- John P Hunt (2)
-
- Michael Blumm (2)
- Carliss N Chatman (1)
- David Crump (1)
- George Skouras (1)
- Jacob P. Byl (1)
- James Valvo (1)
- Joe Custer (1)
- John Infranca (1)
- Margaret E Johnson (1)
- Melissa K. Scanlan (1)
- Michael C. Pollack (1)
- Philip C. Dales (1)
- Scott A. Shepard (1)
- Sylvia B. St. Clair (1)
- Tim Iglesias (1)
- Vicenç Feliú (1)
- Yasmany Barroso (1)
- martin hirschprung (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 31 - 39 of 39
Full-Text Articles in Law
Hola Preemption And The Original Intent Of Congress: Are Federal Thrifts Necessary To Stabilize The Housing Market?, Carliss N. Chatman
Hola Preemption And The Original Intent Of Congress: Are Federal Thrifts Necessary To Stabilize The Housing Market?, Carliss N. Chatman
Carliss N Chatman
This article studies legislation, regulations, and case law to analyze whether the Homeowners Loan Act, as well as other measures taken to stabilize federal thrifts in the last forty years, have served their original purpose. It also examines the impact of federal intervention on states and homeowners and the role that federally-chartered institutions such as banks and savings and loan associations played in the 2008 market collapse. Over the course of this analysis, particular attention is given to Title X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. This act has numerous goals including implementing stronger consumer protections, …
Once A Failed Remic, Never A Remic, David J. Reiss, Bradley T. Borden
Once A Failed Remic, Never A Remic, David J. Reiss, Bradley T. Borden
David J Reiss
This article analyses how courts may reach results that undercut arguments that REMICs were the owners of the mortgage notes and mortgages for tax purposes. And even if the majority of states rule in favor of REMICs, the few that do not can destroy the REMIC classification of many mortgage-back securities that were structured to be—and promoted to investors as—REMICs. This is because rating agencies require that REMICs be geographically diversified in order to spread the risk of defaults caused by local economic conditions, REMICs hold notes and mortgages from multiple jurisdictions. Most, if not all, REMICs own mortgages notes …
Dirty Remics, Revisited, David J. Reiss, Bradley T. Borden
Dirty Remics, Revisited, David J. Reiss, Bradley T. Borden
David J Reiss
We review the differences between two visions for the residential mortgage markets, one driven by the goal of efficiency and the other driven by the goals of efficiency and consumer protection. Both visions advocate for structural reform, but one advocates for industry-led change and the other advocates for input from a wider array of stakeholders. Broader input is not only important to ensure that a broad range of interests are represented but also to ensure the long-term legitimacy of the new system. This is a response to Joshua Stein, Dirt Lawyers Versus Wall Street: A Different View, PROBATE AND PROPERTY …
Dirt Lawyers And Dirty Remics: A Debate, David J. Reiss, Bradley T. Borden, Joshua Stein
Dirt Lawyers And Dirty Remics: A Debate, David J. Reiss, Bradley T. Borden, Joshua Stein
David J Reiss
In mid-2013, Professors Bradley T. Borden and David J. Reiss published an article in the American Bar Association’s PROBATE & PROPERTY journal (May/June 2013, at 13), about the disconnect between the securitization process and the mechanics of mortgage assignments. The Borden/Reiss article discussed potential legal and tax issues caused by sloppiness in mortgage assignments.
Joshua Stein responded to the Borden/Reiss article, arguing that the technicalities of mortgage assignments serve no real purpose and should be eliminated. That article appeared in the November/December 2013 issue of the same publication, at 6.
Stein’s response was accompanied by a commentary from Professors Borden …
Can't Buy Me Love: Monetary Versus In-Kind Remedies, Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir
Can't Buy Me Love: Monetary Versus In-Kind Remedies, Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir
Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir
The choice of appropriate remedies is a major concern in all legal spheres, yet little has been done to determine which remedies people actually prefer. Scholarly debates on this issue are typically based on theoretical arguments and intuitions rather than experimental or empirical data. It is often assumed that people are indifferent between in-kind and monetary remedies of equal pecuniary value. Consequently, some scholars have argued, for instance, that people ordinarily view a contractual obligation as an option to either perform in-kind or pay expectation damages.
This Article challenges the conventional wisdom that monetary remedies are usually a satisfactory substitute …
North Carolina Bids Goodbye (Again) To The Rule In Dumpor's Case, John V. Orth
North Carolina Bids Goodbye (Again) To The Rule In Dumpor's Case, John V. Orth
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Plans Are Not Enough, Michael Lewyn
Plans Are Not Enough, Michael Lewyn
Michael E Lewyn
Some commentators see comprehensive municipal plans as a remedy for suburban sprawl. But in fact, a plan can be used to promote sprawl as well as to prevent sprawl.
Does Fair Housing Law Apply To “Shared Living Situations”? Or, The Trouble With Roommates, Tim Iglesias
Does Fair Housing Law Apply To “Shared Living Situations”? Or, The Trouble With Roommates, Tim Iglesias
Tim Iglesias
In 2012, the Ninth Circuit held that to avoid a constitutional conflict with the right to freedom of association neither the federal Fair Housing Act nor California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act apply to persons seeking roommates or to other shared living situations. This article criticizes the opinion as poorly reasoned and overly broad and then offers a more targeted legislative solution to the problem.
This is an abbreviated version of the article that appeared in the JOURNAL OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LAW (Spring 2014).
A Uniform Perpetuities Reform Act, Scott A. Shepard
A Uniform Perpetuities Reform Act, Scott A. Shepard
Scott A. Shepard
For centuries the Rule Against Perpetuities provided protection against a pair of dangers: that important stocks of property would become, effectively, permanently inalienable as a result of perpetual conditional gifts; and that the dead would be permitted to control the destinies of the living by placing permanent conditions on the fixed stock of available wealth (i.e., land wealth). In recent decades, though, the states have increasingly abandoned the Rule and its protections. As of 2011 all states have migrated beyond the traditional “21-years-plus-life-in-being” Rule, and more than half have actually or effectively abolished their Rules, at least insofar as applied …