Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (111)
- SelectedWorks (53)
- Pepperdine University (52)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (16)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (14)
-
- UIC School of Law (14)
- University of Michigan Law School (13)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (12)
- Georgetown University Law Center (10)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (10)
- Duke Law (9)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (9)
- New York Law School (7)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (6)
- Fordham Law School (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- University of Richmond (5)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- University of Georgia School of Law (4)
- Florida State University College of Law (3)
- Pace University (3)
- St. John's University School of Law (3)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (3)
- Barry University School of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Florida International University College of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Legal history (28)
- Legal History (26)
- Constitutional Law (21)
- History (19)
- Constitutional law (18)
-
- Constitution (16)
- Jurisprudence (15)
- Law (14)
- Supreme Court (14)
- Law and Society (11)
- Mediation (11)
- Selected Professional Activities (11)
- Criminal law (9)
- Feminism (9)
- Gender (9)
- United States (9)
- Victims' rights (9)
- Alternative dispute resolution (8)
- Direito Constitucional (8)
- Victims of crimes (8)
- Crime victims (7)
- Criminal justice system (7)
- Crise (7)
- Dispute Resolution (6)
- Legal Education (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Popular Press (6)
- Slavery (6)
- United States Supreme Court (6)
- Arab Spring (5)
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (29)
- Paulo Ferreira da Cunha (23)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (23)
- Faculty Scholarship (22)
- Kent Greenfield (15)
-
- UMKC Law Review (15)
- All Faculty Scholarship (14)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (12)
- Villanova Law Review (12)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (10)
- Scholarly Works (9)
- Articles (8)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Daniel R. Coquillette (7)
- Ahmed E SOUAIAIA (6)
- Leonid G. Berlyavskiy (6)
- NYLS Law Review (6)
- Publications (6)
- Legal History Publications (5)
- Michigan Law Review (5)
- Patricio Lazo (5)
- David B Kopel (4)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (4)
- Law Faculty Publications (4)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (4)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Ian C Bartrum (3)
- J. Stanley McQuade (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 421 - 424 of 424
Full-Text Articles in Law
Hauerwas And The Law: Is There A Basis For Conversation?, M. Cathleen Kaveny
Hauerwas And The Law: Is There A Basis For Conversation?, M. Cathleen Kaveny
M. Cathleen Kaveny
No abstract provided.
Between “Metaphysics Of The Stone Age” And The “Brave New World”: H.L.A. Hart On The Law’S Assumptions About Human Nature, Péter Cserne
Between “Metaphysics Of The Stone Age” And The “Brave New World”: H.L.A. Hart On The Law’S Assumptions About Human Nature, Péter Cserne
Péter Cserne
This paper analyses H.L.A. Hart’s views on the epistemic character of the law’s assumptions about human behaviour, as articulated in Causation in the Law and Punishment and Responsibility. Hart suggests that the assumptions behind legal doctrines typically combine common sense factual beliefs, moral intuitions, and philosophical theories of earlier ages with sound moral principles, and empirical knowledge. An important task of legal theory is to provide a ‘rational and critical foundation’ for these doctrines. This does not only imply conceptual clarification in light of an epistemic ideal of objectivity but also involves legal theorists in ‘enlightenment’ about empirical facts, ‘demystification’ …
What Piece Of Work Is Man: Frans De Waal And Pragmatist Naturalism, Wouter H. De Been, Sanne Taekema
What Piece Of Work Is Man: Frans De Waal And Pragmatist Naturalism, Wouter H. De Been, Sanne Taekema
Wouter H. de Been
Frans de Waal has questioned a central premise of liberal theory, i.e. that human beings are primarily defined by selfishness and rationality. This premise does not conform to what we know from research about our primate origins - namely that primates are gregarious and guided by sympathy and empathy. De Waal argues we should return to Adam Smith’s moral theory and his focus on sympathy and empathy. We believe a return to pragmatism would be more appropriate. Pragmatism largely conforms to the view of human nature that De Waal’s research now supports. We argue that pragmatism can provide a more …
Bad News For John Marshall, David B. Kopel, Gary Lawson
Bad News For John Marshall, David B. Kopel, Gary Lawson
David B Kopel
In Bad News for Professor Koppelman: The Incidental Unconstitutionality of the Individual Mandate, we demonstrated that the individual mandate’s forced participation in commercial transactions cannot be justified under the Necessary and Proper Clause as the Clause was interpreted in McCulloch v. Maryland. Professor Andrew Koppelman’s response, Bad News for Everybody, wrongly conflates that argument with a wide range of interpretative and substantive positions that are not logically entailed by taking seriously the requirement that laws enacted under the Necessary and Proper Clause must be incidental to an enumerated power. His response is thus largely unresponsive to our actual arguments.