Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

2008

Public Law and Legal Theory

Discipline
Institution
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 31 - 60 of 112

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Emergent Logic Of Health Law, Maxwell Gregg Bloche Aug 2008

The Emergent Logic Of Health Law, Maxwell Gregg Bloche

Maxwell Gregg Bloche

The American health care system is on a glide path toward ruin. Health spending has become the fiscal equivalent of global warming, and the number of uninsured Americans is approaching 50 million. Can law help to divert our country from this path? There are reasons for deep skepticism. Law governs the provision and financing of medical care in fragmented and incoherent fashion. Commentators from diverse perspectives bemoan this chaos, casting it as an obstacle to change. I contend in this article that pessimism about health law’s prospects is unjustified, but that a new understanding of health law’s disarray is urgently …


Lessons From The Laboratory: The Polar Opposites On The Public Sector Labor Law Spectrum, Ann C. Hodges Aug 2008

Lessons From The Laboratory: The Polar Opposites On The Public Sector Labor Law Spectrum, Ann C. Hodges

Ann C. Hodges

One of the professed advantages of the varied state law regimes in public sector labor law is the potential for studying these regimes to determine the most effective legal approach to labor relations. Yet the legal scholarship focused on public sector labor law has been limited. This article is an attempt to fill the void. The article compares the legal approaches of Illinois and Virginia, two states at the opposite ends of the legal spectrum. The law in Illinois is favorable to unionization and collective bargaining while Virginia law is hostile, outlawing public sector bargaining altogether. The article analyzes the …


The Rest Is Silence: Chevron Deference, Agency Jurisdiction, And Statutory Silences, Jonathan H. Adler, Nathan A. Sales Aug 2008

The Rest Is Silence: Chevron Deference, Agency Jurisdiction, And Statutory Silences, Jonathan H. Adler, Nathan A. Sales

Jonathan H Adler

Should agencies receive Chevron deference when interpreting the reach of their own jurisdiction? This article argues that, in general, they should not. We begin by identifying and detailing the various different types of “jurisdictional questions” that may arise in statutory interpretation. The article then surveys how courts have analyzed these different aspects of the jurisdiction problem, with a particular attention to statutory silences. The Court’s Chevron jurisprudence strongly suggest that deference to agency determinations of their own jurisdiction should be disfavored, particularly where a statute is silent (and not merely ambiguous) about the existence of agency jurisdiction. In particular, we …


Rulemaking Without Rules: An Empirical Study Of Direct Final Rulemaking, Michael Kolber Aug 2008

Rulemaking Without Rules: An Empirical Study Of Direct Final Rulemaking, Michael Kolber

Michael Kolber

In an effort to improve efficiency, several administrative agencies have adopted a procedure known as “direct final rulemaking” (DFR). Some academics have debated whether DFR violates the Administrative Procedure Act, but none have studied how DFR has functioned in practice. This paper, which examines the first decade of DFR at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), is the first of this kind. The results are surprising, and suggest DFR deserves more study than it has received. Intended for noncontroversial rules that are expected to receive no significant comments in a notice-and-comment rulemaking, FDA has often used direct final rulemaking for …


"Mr. Presidential Candidate: Whom Would You Nominate?", Stuart M. Benjamin, Mitu Gulati Aug 2008

"Mr. Presidential Candidate: Whom Would You Nominate?", Stuart M. Benjamin, Mitu Gulati

Stuart M Benjamin

Presidential candidates compete on multiple fronts for votes. Who is more likeable? Who will more effectively negotiate with allies and adversaries? Who has the better vice-presidential running mate? Who will make better appointments to the Supreme Court and the cabinet? This last question is often discussed long before the inauguration, for the impact of a Secretary of State or a Supreme Court Justice can be tremendous. The importance of such appointments notwithstanding, presidential candidates are not pushed to name their prospective appointees, pre-election. In other words, we do not expect candidates to compete on naming the better slates of nominees. …


Game Theory And Law: A (Lack Of) Progress Report, Richard H. Mcadams Aug 2008

Game Theory And Law: A (Lack Of) Progress Report, Richard H. Mcadams

Richard H. McAdams

This essay reviews the state of game theory in legal scholarship and finds that it remains excessively focused on one tool: the Prisoners’ Dilemma. I claim that this focus is not justified, that it distracts legal scholars from exploiting other insights of game theory, particularly the problem of coordination. I show how the need for coordination is as pervasive and important to law as the Prisoners’ Dilemma, illustrating with game theory discussions of constitutional law, international law, property disputes, traffic, culture, gender roles, and many other topics.


Trapped In The Law? How Lawyers Reconcile The Legal And Social Aspects Of Their Work, Hadar Aviram Aug 2008

Trapped In The Law? How Lawyers Reconcile The Legal And Social Aspects Of Their Work, Hadar Aviram

Hadar Aviram

This Article addresses an immensely important, and often neglected, problem faced by legal practitioners in their daily professional lives: how do legal actors feel, and act, when the cases in which they are involved have evident, and disturbing, socio-economic implications? This situation is particularly uncomfortable for prosecutors, judges, and defense attorneys, whose criminal case workload often reflects much deeper social inequalities and problems, and whose defendant population is characterized by an overrepresentation of disempowered groups. Legal actors who engage daily with "the tip of the social iceberg" in the courtroom are keenly aware of the broader aspects of the problem; …


Members Of Parliament’S Privileges And Subjects’ Protection From Libel, Noel Cox Aug 2008

Members Of Parliament’S Privileges And Subjects’ Protection From Libel, Noel Cox

Noel Cox

In Buchanan v Jennings [2002] 3 NZLR 145 (CA); [2004] UKPC 36; [2005] 2 All ER 273 (New Zealand PC) the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, on appeal from the Court of Appeal of New Zealand (unanimously) held that a Member of Parliament may be held liable in defamation if the member makes a defamatory statement in the House of Representatives and later affirmed the statement (without repeating it) on an occasion which was not protected by parliamentary privilege. The statement in the House was covered by absolute privilege in the Defamation Act 1992 (N.Z.) and the Bill of …


Peerage Privileges Since The House Of Lords Act 1999, Noel Cox Aug 2008

Peerage Privileges Since The House Of Lords Act 1999, Noel Cox

Noel Cox

The recent and ongoing reform of the House of Lords in the United Kingdom, which has thus far seen the passage of the House of Lords Act 1999, which excluded almost all hereditary peers and peeresses from the House, has focused attention upon the appointment process for membership of the upper house, whether hereditary, appointed, or elected. Less attention has been paid to the role of the peerage. Though officially it is said that any proposals for substantial reform of the composition of the Lords will have to look at the Lords’ role, powers and procedures and its relationship with …


Tort Experiments In The Laboratories Of Democracy, Alexandra B. Klass Aug 2008

Tort Experiments In The Laboratories Of Democracy, Alexandra B. Klass

Alexandra B. Klass

This Article considers the broad range of “tort experiments” states have undertaken in recent years as well as the changing attitudes of Congress and the Supreme Court toward state tort law. Notably, as states have engaged in well-publicized tort reform efforts in the products liability and personal injury areas, they have also increased tort rights and remedies to address new societal problems associated with privacy, publicity, consumer protection, and environmental harm. At the same time, however, just as the Supreme Court was beginning its so-called “federalism revolution” of the 1990s to limit Congressional authority in the name of states’ rights, …


No More Secret Laws: How Transparency Of Executive Branch Legal Policy Doesn't Let The Terrorists Win, Sudha Setty Aug 2008

No More Secret Laws: How Transparency Of Executive Branch Legal Policy Doesn't Let The Terrorists Win, Sudha Setty

Sudha Setty

The rule of law in a democratic nation demands that the laws governing people are not secret. Yet parts of the executive branch’s legal policy that govern aspects of the current war on terror are laid out in non-public opinions issued the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel. Many of those opinions, which are almost always binding on the executive branch and are used to provide legal comfort to government officials in the form of protection against future investigation or prosecution, are still secret or were kept secret for years before being leaked or disseminated to Congress and the …


"Smile, You're On Cellphone Camera!": Regulating Online Video Privacy In The Myspace Generation, Jacqueline D. Lipton Aug 2008

"Smile, You're On Cellphone Camera!": Regulating Online Video Privacy In The Myspace Generation, Jacqueline D. Lipton

Jacqueline D Lipton

In the latest Batman movie, Bruce Wayne’s corporate right hand man, Lucius Fox, copes stoically with the death and destruction dogging his boss. Interestingly, the last straw for him is Bruce’s request that he use digital video surveillance created through the city’s cellphone network to spy on the people of Gotham City in order to locate the Joker. Does this tell us something about the increasing social importance of privacy, particularly in an age where digital video technology is ubiquitous and largely unregulated? While much digital privacy law and commentary has focused on text files containing personal data, little attention …


“Mr. Presidential Candidate: Whom Would You Nominate?”, Stuart M. Benjamin, Mitu Gulati Aug 2008

“Mr. Presidential Candidate: Whom Would You Nominate?”, Stuart M. Benjamin, Mitu Gulati

Stuart M Benjamin

Presidential candidates compete on multiple fronts for votes. Who is more likeable? Who will more effectively negotiate with allies and adversaries? Who has the better vice-presidential running mate? Who will make better appointments to the Supreme Court and the cabinet? This last question is often discussed long before the inauguration, for the impact of a Secretary of State or a Supreme Court Justice can be tremendous. The importance of such appointments notwithstanding, presidential candidates are not pushed to name their prospective appointees, pre-election. In other words, we do not expect candidates to compete on naming the better slates of nominees. …


Some Penetrating Observations On The Fifth Anniversary Of Lawrence V. Texas: Privacy, Dominance, And Substantive Equality Theory, Shannon Gilreath Aug 2008

Some Penetrating Observations On The Fifth Anniversary Of Lawrence V. Texas: Privacy, Dominance, And Substantive Equality Theory, Shannon Gilreath

Shannon Gilreath

This article, “Some Penetrating Observations on the Fifth Anniversary of Lawrence v. Texas: Privacy, Dominance, and Substantive Equality Theory,” asks the reader to look at the equality claims of minority groups at a new conceptual level. With the Lawrence decision as its critical paradigm, the essay proceeds through several observations on the failure of privacy/substantive due process grounded opinions to deliver rights to minorities. This discussion feeds an ultimate criticism of the equality analysis (or lack thereof) of many of the Court’s principal minority rights opinions. Particularly, I am critical of the longstanding notion that equal protection of the laws …


Hard And Soft Constitutionalism, Noel Cox Aug 2008

Hard And Soft Constitutionalism, Noel Cox

Noel Cox

This article looks at some of the theories that have been posited to help explain the rise and fall of civilisations. This article introduces the concept of the hard and soft constitution. Briefly, this is the principle that the flexibility of the constitution – it liberality – has a direct effect upon the success or failure of the state. The more flexible (or soft) the constitution the greater is the likelihood of success, as flexibility requires the development of shared power, dynamic tension, yet an overall cohesion that brings much needed political, social and economic stability.


The Legitimacy Of Government And The Normative Influence Of The Crown On A Political Construct, Noel Cox Aug 2008

The Legitimacy Of Government And The Normative Influence Of The Crown On A Political Construct, Noel Cox

Noel Cox

The Crown holds the conceptual place held by the State in those legal systems derived from or influenced by the Roman civil law. Not only does the Crown provide a legal basis for governmental action, but it provides some of the legal and political legitimacy for such action. The first section of this paper looks at what is meant by legitimacy, and its place in the constitutional order. The second section looks at challenges to this legitimacy. The third section examines the concept of the rule of law and the normative effect of the Crown, and how this has influenced …


The Rise And Fall Of States: Some Constitutional Modelling, Noel Cox Aug 2008

The Rise And Fall Of States: Some Constitutional Modelling, Noel Cox

Noel Cox

From Gibbons’ Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, onwards – and indeed even earlier – there have been various attempts to explain the apparent mystery of why some civilisations rose and fell, apparently without reason, or at least without reasons that were readily apparent to the later observer (or indeed to the contemporary observer). Some of these studies have sought to identify key political or military influences – or the advent of a new technology – as affecting success or failure. Others have emphasised structural elements, such as the existence or absence of critical environmental factors. In a comparatively …


Behavioral Public Finance, Edward J. Mccaffery Jul 2008

Behavioral Public Finance, Edward J. Mccaffery

Edward J McCaffery

These are slides from a presentation to the Gruter Institute for Law and Behavioral Research, Squaw Valley Conference, May, 2008 (at which event Michael Jensen got me to agree to post these slides as a pdf on SSRN . . . ). The task is to give an overview of what I hope to be an emerging field of behavioral public finance. Behavioral finance, as per Barberis and Thaler 2003 (and others), consists of two parts: (1) individual level heuristics and biases, which can lead to sub-optimal (inconsistent) judgment and decision-making, and (2) institutional arbitrage mechanisms. In private finance and …


Comments On Liebman And Zeckhauser, Simple Humans, Complex Insurance, Subtle Subsidies, Edward J. Mccaffery Jul 2008

Comments On Liebman And Zeckhauser, Simple Humans, Complex Insurance, Subtle Subsidies, Edward J. Mccaffery

Edward J McCaffery

These are brief comments on an excellent paper by Jeffrey Liebman and Richard Zeckhauser, prepared for a conference sponsored by the Urban Institute and Brookings on tax and health care policy. Liebman and Zeckhauser summarize the complexities involved in making optimal health insurance decisions, and offer generally cautionary notes about conflating these with tax law (a theme of the conference). Most importantly, Liebman and Zeckhauser suggest a positive role for employers in health care and insurance decisions, as better setters or framers of choice sets—witness 401(k) plans. In this Commentary, I applaud Leibman and Zeckhauser’s general work and particular observation, …


Government Lawyer As Cause Lawyer: A Study Of Three High Profile Government Lawsuits, Steve Berenson Jul 2008

Government Lawyer As Cause Lawyer: A Study Of Three High Profile Government Lawsuits, Steve Berenson

Steve Berenson

Over the past decade a broad and deep literature has developed mapping the contours of the work of cause lawyers – those lawyers who attempt to use the law to achieve social change objectives. However, very little of that literature addresses the work of government lawyers. At first blush, this makes perfect sense. After all, when they defend government officials charged with wrongdoing, or statutes and regulations charged with illegality, government lawyers are the ultimate representatives of the status quo. However, in other contexts, government lawyers may initiate cases that have social change objectives. Indeed, some of these cases bear …


Understanding Post's And Meiklejohn's Mistakes: The Central Role Of Adversary Democracy In The Theory Of Free Expression, Martin H. Redish, Abby Marie Mollen Jul 2008

Understanding Post's And Meiklejohn's Mistakes: The Central Role Of Adversary Democracy In The Theory Of Free Expression, Martin H. Redish, Abby Marie Mollen

Martin H Redish

In this article we provide a comprehensive and original critique of the free speech theories of two of the most heralded scholars of all time, Alexander Meiklejohn and Robert Post, and in so doing employ their theories as a foil for the development of an entirely new theory of free expression, grounded in precepts of "adversary democracy." Both Post and Meiklejohn purport to ground their theories of free expression in democratic theory, but both misperceive the true normative and descriptive nature of American political theory, and in any event both fashion free speech theories that undermine even their own perceptions …


From Pedagogical Sociology To Constitutional Adjudication: The Meaning Of Desegregation In Social Science Research And Law, Anne Richardson Oakes Jul 2008

From Pedagogical Sociology To Constitutional Adjudication: The Meaning Of Desegregation In Social Science Research And Law, Anne Richardson Oakes

Anne Richardson Oakes

In the United States following the case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954) federal judges with responsibility for public school desegregation but no expertise in education or schools management appointed experts from the social sciences to act as court advisors. In Boston, MA, educational sociologists helped Judge W. Arthur Garrity design a plan with educational enhancement at its heart, but the educational outcomes were marginalized by a desegregation jurisprudence conceptualized in terms of race rather than education. This paper explores the frustration of outcomes in Boston by reference to the differing conceptualizations of desegregation in law and social science. …


Homeland Security Challenges Of Global Climate Change, Patrick E. Tolan Jul 2008

Homeland Security Challenges Of Global Climate Change, Patrick E. Tolan

Patrick E. Tolan Jr.

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 directs military planners to consider the effects of climate change on national security. This directive is not surprising following a year of increasing concern about global warming and prognostications of the myriad ills that such warming will produce.

Although some excellent articles have recently been published exploring potential overseas consequences to the Department of Defense, this article instead outlines the perhaps even more significant national security threats to the U.S. homeland.

The article takes a three-pronged approach analyzing potential weather effects, refugee issues, and economic consequences that could be prompted by …


Taking Distribution Seriously, Robert C. Hockett Jul 2008

Taking Distribution Seriously, Robert C. Hockett

Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers

It is common for legal theorists and policy analysts to think and communicate mainly in maximizing terms. What is less common is for them to notice that each time we speak explicitly of socially maximizing one thing, we speak implicitly of distributing another thing and equalizing yet another thing. We also, moreover, effectively define ourselves and our fellow citizens by reference to that which we equalize; for it is in virtue of the latter that our social welfare formulations treat us as “counting” for purposes of socially aggregating and maximizing.

To attend systematically to the inter-translatability of maximization language on …


Restorative Justice: Sketching A New Legal Discourse, Frank D. Hill Jul 2008

Restorative Justice: Sketching A New Legal Discourse, Frank D. Hill

Frank D Hill

Restorative justice has emerged as an increasingly accepted approach to criminal law around the world over the last 30 years or so. Unlike the traditional theories of justice – Kantian justice and utilitarian efficiency – restorative justice focuses on the private rather than the public effects of crime. Restorativists emphasize the needs of primary stakeholders, namely victims and offenders, over the needs of society at large when considering how the criminal justice system should respond to crime. This Article argues this difference in focus is reflected in the various theories’ conceptions of human nature and subjectivity. While the traditional theories …


The Role Of Informal Legal Institutions In Economic Development, Kevin J. Fandl Jun 2008

The Role Of Informal Legal Institutions In Economic Development, Kevin J. Fandl

Kevin J Fandl

The purveyance of the rule of law in developing countries has frequently been associated with positive economic development. Better clarity, scope, transparency and enforcement of the laws will promote confidence and trust in the formal legal system, the argument suggests. At its core, this argument misses a fundamental yet widely recognized tangent to the rule of law – the role of informal legal institutions. The perception of legal systems perpetrated by the state - formal legal systems - is negative in many developing countries. Corruption, high costs and lengthy time periods for issue resolution limit the ability and willingness of …


How The Separation Of Powers Doctrine Shaped The Executive, Louis J. Sirico Jr. Jun 2008

How The Separation Of Powers Doctrine Shaped The Executive, Louis J. Sirico Jr.

Working Paper Series

This Article examines the debates of the Founders over the separation of powers doctrine as it relates to the executive branch. After surveying the experience in the colonies and under the post-Revolutionary state constitutions, it analyzes the relevant issues at the Constitutional Convention. Rather than focusing on abstract discussions of political theory, the article examines specific decisions and controversies in which separation of powers was a concern. The Article offers a detailed recounting of those debates. At the Convention, separation of powers arose most prominently in the arguments over nine issues: choosing the Executive, permitting the Executive to stand for …


Theoretical Perspectives On Public Law, Administration And Public Health History, Lydia C. Stewart Ferreira May 2008

Theoretical Perspectives On Public Law, Administration And Public Health History, Lydia C. Stewart Ferreira

Lydia C. Stewart Ferreira

The struggle between authority and liberty, the tyranny of the majority, the prevention of harm, unlimited state control, the necessary rights belonging to citizens, and the establishment of contritutional checks by a consenting community - is the theory and practice of public health. This paper seeks to explore the interaction of epidemics on public and administrative legal theory. It is proposed that the legal theories of Locke in the 1600s and Mills in the 1800s regarding state and individual legal rights were shaped by public health disease epidemics of their day.


The Cause Of Racial Inequality In America Today: Innocent Victims Or Guilty Victimizers, Leigh E. Dalton May 2008

The Cause Of Racial Inequality In America Today: Innocent Victims Or Guilty Victimizers, Leigh E. Dalton

Leigh E Dalton

Abstract: Inspired by public debate over Bill Cosby’s address at the 50th Anniversary of Commemoration of the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision, this article focuses on the cause of racial inequality today. Many race theorists, including Derrick Bell and Patricia Williams, assert that racism is a structural reality within America’s institutions, perpetuating oppression and lack of opportunity for African Americans. Other race theorists, such as Shelby Steele and John McWhorter, claim racism is no longer institutionalized in America, but instead used as a crutch to create black power and hold whites responsible for slavery and segregation. To …


Civil Society And Its Discontents: The Two Pillars Of Edmund Burke's Legal Philosophy, James A. Todd May 2008

Civil Society And Its Discontents: The Two Pillars Of Edmund Burke's Legal Philosophy, James A. Todd

James A. Todd

Author’s Abstract: This article will undertake a complete survey of the jurisprudential thought of Edmund Burke. In doing so, it will attempt to place civil society as the focus of all jurisprudential elements of Burke’s thought. Burke put forward the components of a legal order that tended toward the establishment of a fundamentally liberal society, with spontaneity as the engine of both law and social growth. The positive pillar of Burke’s thought refers to the maxims of jurisprudence that foster social harmony, allowing this growth to proceed apace. The complementing, negative pillar of Burke’s legal thought focuses on protecting these …