Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (21)
- UIC School of Law (19)
- University of Richmond (13)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (9)
- Brigham Young University Law School (8)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (5)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (5)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- West Virginia University (3)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (2)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Congress (9)
- Judicial review (7)
- Citizenship (5)
- Constitution (5)
- Legislative drafting (5)
-
- McCain (John) (5)
- Natural born citizens (5)
- Panama Canal Zone (5)
- Statutory interpretation (5)
- Judges (4)
- United States Supreme Court (4)
- D.C. Courts (3)
- District of Columbia Democracy (3)
- Elections (3)
- Federal courts (3)
- History (3)
- International Criminal Court (3)
- Symposium (3)
- Tribunals (3)
- Amendment 80 (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Courts (2)
- Databases (2)
- Democracy (2)
- Eligibility (2)
- Federal Circuit (2)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (2)
- Federal rulemaking (2)
- Home Rule (2)
- International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (2)
- Publication
-
- UIC Law Review (16)
- University of Richmond Law Review (13)
- Michigan Law Review (9)
- University of the District of Columbia Law Review (9)
- Indiana Law Journal (5)
-
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (5)
- Oklahoma Law Review (5)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (5)
- BYU Law Review (3)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (3)
- West Virginia Law Review (3)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (2)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (2)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (2)
- North Carolina Central Law Review (2)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (2)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
- Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal (1)
- Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review (1)
- Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- NYLS Law Review (1)
- Pace Law Review (1)
- Tennessee Law Review (1)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1)
- Washington International Law Journal (1)
Articles 91 - 101 of 101
Full-Text Articles in Law
Make The Dream A Reality: Why Passing The Dream Act Is The Logical First Step In Achieving Comprehensive Immigration Reform, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1251 (2008), Aimee Deverall
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
What To Do With Omar Khadr? Putting A Child Soldier On Trial: Questions Of International Law, Juvenile Justice, And Moral Culpability, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1281 (2008), Christopher L. Dore
What To Do With Omar Khadr? Putting A Child Soldier On Trial: Questions Of International Law, Juvenile Justice, And Moral Culpability, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1281 (2008), Christopher L. Dore
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chief Judges: The Limits Of Attitudinal Theory And Possible Paradox Of Managerial Judging, Tracey E. George, Albert H. Yoon
Chief Judges: The Limits Of Attitudinal Theory And Possible Paradox Of Managerial Judging, Tracey E. George, Albert H. Yoon
Vanderbilt Law Review
Grutter v. Bollinger is familiar to American lawyers, academics, and law students as the Supreme Court decision allowing the consideration of race in law school admissions.1 Grutter's procedural history is nearly as noteworthy as its substantive holding. The University of Michigan Law School, after losing in federal district court, appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Three Democratic appointees were assigned to the panel: Judges Karen Nelson Moore and Martha Craig Daughtrey, who had heard an earlier interlocutory appeal, and Chief Judge Boyce Martin, who replaced the designated district judge from the earlier panel. The white …
Justness! Speed! Inexpense! An Introduction To The Revolution Of 1938 Revisited: The Role And Future Of The Federal Rules, Steven S. Gensler
Justness! Speed! Inexpense! An Introduction To The Revolution Of 1938 Revisited: The Role And Future Of The Federal Rules, Steven S. Gensler
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Not Dead Yet, Richard L. Marcus
Making Effective Rules: The Need For Procedure Theory, Robert G. Bone
Making Effective Rules: The Need For Procedure Theory, Robert G. Bone
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Patients As Consumers: Courts, Cotnracts, And The New Medical Marketplace, Mark A. Hall, Carl E. Schneider
Patients As Consumers: Courts, Cotnracts, And The New Medical Marketplace, Mark A. Hall, Carl E. Schneider
Michigan Law Review
The persistent riddle of health-care policy is how to control the costs while improving the quality of care. The riddle's oncepromising answer-managed care-has been politically ravaged, and consumerist solutions are now winning favor This Article examines the legal condition of the patient-as-consumer in today's health-care market. It finds that insurers bargain with some success for rates for the people they insure. The uninsured, however, must contract to pay whatever a provider charges and then are regularly charged prices that are several times insurers'pricesa nd providers' actual costs. Perhaps because they do not understand the healthcare market, courts generally enforce these …
Scrutiny Land, Randy E. Barnett
Scrutiny Land, Randy E. Barnett
Michigan Law Review
Scrutiny Land is the place where government needs to justify to a court its restrictions on the liberties of the people. In the 1930s, the Supreme Court began limiting access to Scrutiny Land. While the New Deal Court merely shifted the burden to those challenging a law to show that a restriction of liberty is irrational, the Warren Court made the presumption of constitutionality effectively irrebuttable. After this, only one road to Scrutiny Land remained: showing that the liberty being restricted was a fundamental right. The Glucksberg Two-Step, however, limited the doctrine of fundamental rights to those (1) narrowly defined …
Death, Dying, And Domination, Marc Spindelman
Death, Dying, And Domination, Marc Spindelman
Michigan Law Review
This Article critiques conventional liberal arguments for the right to die on liberal grounds. It contends that these arguments do not go far enough to recognize and address private, and in particular structural, forms of domination. It presents an alternative that does, which is thus more respectful of true freedom in the context of death and dying, and also more consistent with liberalism. After discussing obstacles to the achievement of a right to die that encompasses freedom from both public and private domination, the Article closes with a significant reform project within bioethics that might help bring it about.
Judicial Compensation And The Definition Of Judicial Power In The Early Republic, James E. Pfander
Judicial Compensation And The Definition Of Judicial Power In The Early Republic, James E. Pfander
Michigan Law Review
Article III's provision for the compensation of federal judges has been much celebrated for the no-diminution provision that forecloses judicial pay cuts. But other features of Article Ill's compensation provision have largely escaped notice. In particular, little attention has been paid to the framers' apparent expectation that Congress would compensate federal judges with salaries alone, payable from the treasury at stated times. Article III's presumption in favor of salary-based compensation may rule out fee-based compensation, which was a common form of judicial compensation in England and the colonies but had grown controversial by the time of the framing. Among other …
A Call For The End Of The Doctrine Of Realignment, Jacob S. Sherkow
A Call For The End Of The Doctrine Of Realignment, Jacob S. Sherkow
Michigan Law Review
In Indianapolis v. Chase National Bank, 1941, the Supreme Court established the doctrine of realignment, requiring federal courts to examine the issues in dispute and realign each party as plaintiff or defendant if necessary. Due to the complete diversity requirement, realignment gave the federal courts the ability to both create and destroy diversity jurisdiction. Since 1941, the federal courts have struggled to interpret the central holding in Indianapolis, and have created several competing "tests" for realignment. This confusion has made the doctrine of realignment unworkable. Realignment along with each of the present tests-encourages jurisdictional abuses by forcing the federal …