Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Juvenile Law (14)
- State and Local Government Law (8)
- Family Law (7)
- Courts (6)
- Environmental Law (6)
-
- Natural Resources Law (6)
- Legislation (5)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Legal Education (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Transnational Law (3)
- Water Law (3)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Law and Psychology (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Property Law and Real Estate (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Disaster Law (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Keyword
-
- Children (14)
- Child welfare (7)
- Families (7)
- Law reform (6)
- Great Lakes (5)
-
- History (4)
- Parents (4)
- Water (4)
- Clinical legal education (3)
- Empirical studies (3)
- Foster care (3)
- Juvenile courts (3)
- Lawyers (3)
- Poverty law (3)
- Best interests (2)
- Canada (2)
- Child Advocacy Law Clinic (2)
- Child abuse (2)
- Child advoacy (2)
- Data (2)
- Environmental protection (2)
- Legal services (2)
- Private property (2)
- Public trust doctrine (2)
- Sentencing (2)
- State agencies (2)
- Statistics (2)
- Treaties (2)
- United States Supreme Court (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
Articles 31 - 31 of 31
Full-Text Articles in Law
Standing Alone: Conformity, Coercion, And The Protection Of The Holdout Juror, Jason D. Reichelt
Standing Alone: Conformity, Coercion, And The Protection Of The Holdout Juror, Jason D. Reichelt
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The holdout juror in felony criminal trials is a product of the near-universal decision rule in federal and state courts of a unanimous verdict. In recent years, courts have increasingly inquired into a jury's deliberations when a holdout juror has been identified amid allegations of misconduct. This Article helps bridge the considerable gap between cognitive psychology and legal scholarship, analyzing the thought processes of the holdout juror through the application of empirical evidence and psychological modeling, to conclude that the improved protection of the holdout juror is a necessary and critical component to the preservation of a defendant's right to …