Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (12)
- University of Richmond (12)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (11)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
-
- Duke Law (5)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (5)
- SelectedWorks (5)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (4)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- Mercer University School of Law (4)
- Pace University (4)
- Penn State Law (4)
- UIC School of Law (4)
- BLR (3)
- University of Washington School of Law (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of New Hampshire (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- West Virginia University (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Duquesne University School of Law (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Keyword
-
- Evidence (40)
- Expert (8)
- Confrontation Clause (7)
- Crawford v. Washington (7)
- Hearsay (7)
-
- Davis v. Washington (6)
- Testimony (6)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (5)
- Cross-examination (5)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (5)
- Scientific evidence (5)
- Sixth Amendment (5)
- United States Supreme Court (5)
- Child witness (4)
- Expert testimony (4)
- Juries (4)
- Child Testimony (3)
- Child abuse (3)
- Child witnesses (3)
- DNA (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Mitochondrial DNA (3)
- Strict liability (3)
- Testimonial (3)
- Witnesses (3)
- Zubulake (3)
- Admissibility (2)
- Chefs (2)
- Cinema (2)
- Confrontation (2)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (14)
- Villanova Law Review (9)
- Articles (6)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (6)
- University of Richmond Law Review (6)
-
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Indiana Law Journal (5)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Mercer Law Review (4)
- Thomas D. Lyon (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- ExpressO (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- NULR Online (3)
- Pace Law Review (3)
- Edward Ivan Cueva (2)
- Faculty Working Papers (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Prof. Boaz Sangero (2)
- Publications (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts (2)
- West Virginia Law Review (2)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (2)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 121 - 129 of 129
Full-Text Articles in Law
Maieusis Through A Gated Membrane: "Getting The Science Right" In Public Decisionmaking, Deborah Hussey Freeland
Maieusis Through A Gated Membrane: "Getting The Science Right" In Public Decisionmaking, Deborah Hussey Freeland
Deborah M. Hussey Freeland
Law meets science in a remarkable variety of contexts. While their interactions are often studied in particular contexts, general theories of their interaction are wanting. This paper presents a general model of an interface between law and science that identifies how their interaction must be structured to promote effective interdisciplinary collaboration, and then demonstrates how this model can be used to analyze problems as diverse as: a large-scale intergovernmental attempt at ecosystem restoration; and the effects of a method of science-based alternative dispute resolution on science and negotiated outcomes. In both cases, the model features of a properly functioning law-science …
Comment On Proposed Federal Rule Of Evidence 502(C), Liesa L. Richter
Comment On Proposed Federal Rule Of Evidence 502(C), Liesa L. Richter
Liesa L. Richter
No abstract provided.
Prosecuting Government Fraud Despite The Csi Effect: Getting The Jury To Follow The Money, James B. Johnston
Prosecuting Government Fraud Despite The Csi Effect: Getting The Jury To Follow The Money, James B. Johnston
James B Johnston
Prosecutors have complained that jurors who think they are educated in crime scene investigations by watching T.V. have made it difficult to prove cases even when the charge is white collar in nature because they expect the forensics the see on the show "CSI". In regard to government fraud cases, the prosecutor simply must get the jury to follow the fraud linked money. This article notes that those in law enforcement must give the jury what they want to get them to follow the money especially when the case concerns government fraud and corruption.
Dred Scott And The Political Question Doctrine, Wesley M. Oliver
Dred Scott And The Political Question Doctrine, Wesley M. Oliver
Wesley M Oliver
No abstract provided.
Unfulfilled Expectations: An Empirical Analysis Of Why Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers Rarely Win, Richard E. Moberly
Unfulfilled Expectations: An Empirical Analysis Of Why Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers Rarely Win, Richard E. Moberly
Richard E. Moberly
Scholars praise the whistleblower protections of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as one of the most protective anti-retaliation provisions in the world. Yet, during its first three years, only 3.6% of Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblowers won relief through the initial administrative process that adjudicates such claims, and only 6.5% of whistleblowers won appeals through the process. This Article reports the results of an empirical study of all Department of Labor Sarbanes-Oxley determinations during this time, consisting of over 700 separate decisions from administrative investigations and hearings. The results of this detailed analysis demonstrate that administrative decision-makers strictly construed, and in some cases …
Why A Conviction Should Not Be Based On A Single Piece Of Evidence: A Proposal For Reform, Boaz Sangero, Mordechai Halpert
Why A Conviction Should Not Be Based On A Single Piece Of Evidence: A Proposal For Reform, Boaz Sangero, Mordechai Halpert
Prof. Boaz Sangero
This article illustrates a serious flaw in the conventional legal approach enabling a conviction based solely on one piece of evidence. This flaw derives from a cognitive illusion referred to as “the fallacy of the transposed conditional.” People might assume a low error rate in evidence only leads to a small percentage of wrongful convictions. We show that, counterintuitively, even a very low error rate might lead to a wrongful conviction in most cases where the conviction is based on a single piece of evidence. Case law has indicated some awareness of this fallacy, primarily when considering the random match …
7. The History Of Children’S Hearsay: From Old Bailey To Post-Davis., Thomas D. Lyon, Raymond Lamagna
7. The History Of Children’S Hearsay: From Old Bailey To Post-Davis., Thomas D. Lyon, Raymond Lamagna
Thomas D. Lyon
2. National Association Of Counsel For Children In Support Of Respondents. Adrian Martell Davis V. Washington, Hershel Hammon V. Indiana (2007)., Thomas D. Lyon
2. National Association Of Counsel For Children In Support Of Respondents. Adrian Martell Davis V. Washington, Hershel Hammon V. Indiana (2007)., Thomas D. Lyon
Thomas D. Lyon
No abstract provided.
Symposium Introduction -- Miranda At 40: Applications In A Post-Enron, Post-9/11 World, Donald J. Kochan
Symposium Introduction -- Miranda At 40: Applications In A Post-Enron, Post-9/11 World, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
The groundbreaking case of Miranda v. Arizona raise[d] questions which go to the roots of our concepts of American criminal jurisprudence: the restraints society must observe consistent with the Federal Constitution in prosecuting individuals for crime. This Introduction to the 2007 Chapman Law Review Symposium summarizes the contemporary examination of Miranda's influence, past and present, along with the continuing debate today. The experiences and precedents that have evolved in the past 40 years helps to explore the evolution of the criminal law and procedural dictates set forth in Miranda. Complications with custodial interrogation - and the impulses and incentives involved …