Law Commons^™

Why It Mattered To Dover That Intelligent Design Isn't Science, Richard B. Katskee

First Amendment Law Review

No abstract provided.

Vestiges Of The Establishment Clause, Steven G. Gey

First Amendment Law Review

No abstract provided.

Vol. 4, No. 06 (September/October 2006)

Indiana Law Update

No abstract provided.

Salt Equalizer, Vol. 2006, Issue 2, Society Of American Law Teachers

SALT Equalizer

Contents of this issue:

Eileen Kaufman & Tayyab Mahmud, Co-Presidents' Column, at 1.

Joan Howarth, New SALT Board of Governors Election Procedures, at 1.

Camille Nelson, 2006 SALT Teaching Conference, at 7.

Nancy Ehrenreich, Politically-Motivated Attacks on Ward Churchill Continue, at 7.

Natsu Taylor Saito, 2006 Robert Cover Workshop: Academic Freedom Under Assault, at 8.

Kellye Testy, Deanship Workshop to Be Held in May, at 9.

Carol Chomsky & Holly Maguigan, SALT Board Retreat and Strategic Planning, at 9.

Margaret Martin Barry, Affirmative Action Committee Report, at 10.

Kathleen Clark, Picking Up …

Integrating A Human Rights Perspective Into The European Approach To Combating The Trafficking Of Women For Sexual Exploitation, Alexandra Amiel

Buffalo Human Rights Law Review

No abstract provided.

2006-2007 Gsulr Masthead, Georgia State University College Of Law

Law Review Mastheads

No abstract provided.

Through A Glass Darkly: Van Orden, Mccreary, And The Dangers Of Transparency In Establishment Clause Jurisprudence, Laura S. Underkuffler

First Amendment Law Review

No abstract provided.

Double Whammy: How The New Credit Card Nondischargeability Provision And The New Means Test Hit Single Mothers Over The Head, Hatty Yip

Buffalo Women's Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Centering Men's Experience: Norah Vincent's Self-Made Man Complicates Feminist Legal Theorists' Views Of Gender, Kathy A. Thomack

Buffalo Women's Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Torch (September 2006), Amy Homans, Civil Rights Team Project

Torch: The Civil Rights Team Project Newsletter

No abstract provided.

The Pragmatic Populism Of Justice Stevens' Free Speech Jurisprudence, Gregory P. Magarian

Working Paper Series

In his three decades on the Supreme Court, Justice John Paul Stevens has developed a distinctive approach to the First Amendment. During his tenure, the Court’s majority has crystallized a theory of First Amendment speech protection as an abstract, negative protection of individual autonomy against government interference. In contrast, Justice Stevens’ pragmatic judicial methodology has caused him to place greater emphasis on free speech decisions’ practical consequences, particularly their effectiveness in making democratic debate inclusive as to both participants and subject matter in order to ensure robust, well-informed public discourse. Alone on the present Court, Justice Stevens manifests a deep …

Beyond The Promises: Resuscitating The State Reporting Procedure Under The African Charter On Human And Peoples' Rights, Takele Soboka Bulto

Buffalo Human Rights Law Review

No abstract provided.

Limiting The Application Of Jus Soli: The Resulting Status Of Undocumented Children In The United States, Brooke Kirkland

Buffalo Human Rights Law Review

No abstract provided.

Human Rights Realization In An Era Of Globalization: The Indian Experience, Surya Deva

Buffalo Human Rights Law Review

No abstract provided.

Human Rights Begin At Home: A Policy Analysis Of Litigating International Human Rights In U.S. State Courts, Anna Maria Gabrielidis

Buffalo Human Rights Law Review

No abstract provided.

Indian Water Rights: Litigation And Settlements, Robert T. Anderson

Tulsa Law Review

No abstract provided.

Section 1813 Of The Energy Policy Act Of 2005: Implications For Tribal Sovereignty And Self-Sufficiency, Paul E. Frye

Tulsa Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Double-Edged Sword Of Indian Gaming, Joshua L. Sohn

Tulsa Law Review

No abstract provided.

Balancing The Scales: Understanding Aboriginal Perspectives On Civil Justice, Mary Stratton

Canadian Forum on Civil Justice

As we visited each of the Civil Justice System and the Public research locations in Alberta, Nova Scotia, Ontario Quebec, Nunavut and British Columbia we contacted local Aboriginal organizations. We talked with Band Councils, Native Friendship Centres, Aboriginal legal aid programs, Native court workers, Aboriginal child welfare agencies and individuals involved in court cases. About 30 Aboriginal people took part in our key contact meetings and interviews that were transcribed and analysed to provide the first draft of this report. Some were members of a First Nation, some were Métis and others were Inuit. They lived on and off Reserves, …

The Interests Of Peoples In The Cooperative Management Of Sacred Sites, Kristen A. Carpenter

Tulsa Law Review

No abstract provided.

Executive Order 13303: Is The Bush Administration Choosing Corporations Over Human Rights Actions Instituted Via The Alien Tort Claims Act, Rod Khavari

Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law

No abstract provided.

Bureaucracy And Distrust: Germaneness And The Paradoxes Of Academic Freedom Doctrine, Alan K. Chen

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

This article proposes a new approach to examining individuals' claims to academic freedom under the First Amendment. It begins with the premise that a major source of confusion under current legal doctrine emerges from two paradoxes. The "positional paradox" exists because various constituents within the public university community may, at times, be state actors, free speech claimants, or sometimes simultaneously both. The resolution of many academic freedom disputes may depend on the relative positions of the free speech claimant and the alleged intruder on that freedom. The "First Amendment paradox" arises because, while a robust version of constitutional academic freedom …

Sioux Unhappy: Challenging The Ncaa's Ban On Native American Imagery, Kelly P. O'Neill

Tulsa Law Review

No abstract provided.

No Thanks, Uncle Sam, You Can Keep Your Tax Break, James Edward Maule

Working Paper Series

This article addresses the question of whether income tax deductions are mandatory, or may be waived by the taxpayer when doing so generates a tax or non-tax benefit. What little authority exists suggests that deductions are optional except in two specific instances related to the computation of net earnings from self-employment. The increasing number of taxpayers subject to the alternative minimum tax, the amount of which can be reduced in many instances by foregoing deductions, makes it very likely that the question will reach the courts in the near future. This article concludes that aside from the two specific instances …

The Military Commissions Act And Its Impact On Our Justice System, Azra B. Zaidi

Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Dead Man Waiting: Death Row Delays, The Eighth Amendment, And What Courts And Legislatures Can Do, Kate Mcmahon

Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Charitable Choice Program And The Lown Case: A Reasonable Solution, Matthew Strabone

Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Overcoming Discrimination In Housing, Credit, And Urban Policy (Transcript), Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal

Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Establishing Anti-Foundationalism Through The Pledge Of Allegiance Cases, Anthony R. Picarello Jr.

First Amendment Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents, Volume 4, Number 3, 2006, Editorial Board

The University of New Hampshire Law Review

The articles in this issue are devoted to the practice of law in New Hampshire.