Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (1021)
- Constitutional Law (835)
- Criminal Law (517)
- Intellectual Property Law (492)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (481)
-
- Environmental Law (432)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (425)
- Law and Society (408)
- Legislation (397)
- Human Rights Law (382)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (361)
- Legal Education (328)
- Health Law and Policy (327)
- Courts (322)
- Criminal Procedure (306)
- Business Organizations Law (303)
- Jurisprudence (268)
- Law and Gender (267)
- Labor and Employment Law (266)
- Law and Economics (259)
- Administrative Law (255)
- Legal History (248)
- Legal Profession (215)
- State and Local Government Law (211)
- Science and Technology Law (202)
- Internet Law (189)
- Law and Politics (189)
- Education Law (188)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (187)
- Institution
-
- Brigham Young University Law School (958)
- BLR (883)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (347)
- Duke Law (330)
- American University Washington College of Law (311)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (292)
- Fordham Law School (290)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (284)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (222)
- William & Mary Law School (219)
- University of Denver (205)
- University of Chicago Law School (174)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (173)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (172)
- Cornell University Law School (170)
- University of Missouri School of Law (158)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (157)
- UC Law SF (153)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (149)
- Georgetown University Law Center (144)
- University of Minnesota Law School (143)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (142)
- New York Law School (138)
- University of South Carolina (137)
- University of Richmond (134)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (130)
- Southern Methodist University (127)
- University of Georgia School of Law (127)
- Marquette University Law School (118)
- University of Colorado Law School (116)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (241)
- International Law (220)
- Law and Society (169)
- Jurisprudence (135)
- Law and Economics (130)
-
- Law (129)
- Constitutional law (122)
- Corporations (122)
- International law (119)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (113)
- Human Rights Law (112)
- Economics (111)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (107)
- Human rights (105)
- Women (104)
- Politics (102)
- Religion (97)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (93)
- Courts (90)
- Intellectual Property Law (85)
- LSU Student Government (80)
- Legislation (77)
- First Amendment (75)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (73)
- Commercial Law (72)
- Contracts (72)
- Copyright (71)
- Internet (71)
- Regulation (71)
- Legal History (69)
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (872)
- Utah Court of Appeals Briefs (1996–2006) (818)
- Faculty Scholarship (652)
- Faculty Publications (326)
- Articles (291)
-
- Scholarly Works (150)
- Water Law Review (125)
- Cardozo Law Review (118)
- Fordham Law Review (114)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (100)
- Student Senate Enrolled Legislation (92)
- GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works (86)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (85)
- NYLS Law Review (83)
- Journal Articles (78)
- McGeorge Law Review (78)
- All Faculty Scholarship (76)
- Michigan Law Review (69)
- Saint Louis University Law Journal (67)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (67)
- SMU Law Review (66)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (64)
- Faculty Articles (64)
- International Law Studies (62)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (61)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (60)
- Nevada Law Journal (60)
- North Carolina Law Review (60)
- Hofstra Law Review (58)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (57)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1471 - 1500 of 11384
Full-Text Articles in Law
Toward A Feminist Theory Of The Rural, Lisa R. Pruitt
Toward A Feminist Theory Of The Rural, Lisa R. Pruitt
ExpressO
Feminists have often criticized law’s ignorance of women’s practical, lived experiences, even as they have also sought to reveal the variety among those experiences. This article builds on both critiques to argue for greater attentiveness to a neglected aspect of women’s situation: place. Specifically, Professor Pruitt asserts that the hardships and vulnerability that mark the lives of rural women and constrain their moral agency are overlooked or discounted by a contemporary cultural presumption of urbanism.
Professor Pruitt considers judicial responses to the realities of rural women’s lives in relation to three different legal issues: domestic violence, termination of parental rights, …
How To Sue Without Standing: The Constitutionality Of Citizen Suits In Non-Article Iii Tribunals, David Krinsky
How To Sue Without Standing: The Constitutionality Of Citizen Suits In Non-Article Iii Tribunals, David Krinsky
ExpressO
In recent years, the “injury-in-fact” standing requirement of Article III has frequently impeded attempts by concerned citizens and public interest groups to challenge government actions in federal court.
This article proposes a way in which “citizen suits”—lawsuits brought by plaintiffs who wish to challenge perceived illegalities that affect the public as a whole—can be given a federal forum. It argues that, with some limitations, Congress has authority to authorize pure citizen suits in Article I tribunals, and discusses the (surmountable) obstacles that such fora pose.
After discussing the constitutionality of citizen suits in Article I tribunals, the article then turns …
Privatizing Eminent Domain: The Delegation Of A Very Public Power To Private, Non-Profit And Charitable Corporations, Asmara Tekle Johnson
Privatizing Eminent Domain: The Delegation Of A Very Public Power To Private, Non-Profit And Charitable Corporations, Asmara Tekle Johnson
ExpressO
In an age of privatization of many governmental functions such as health care, prison management, and warfare, this Article poses the question as to whether eminent domain should be among them. Unlike other privatized functions, eminent domain is a traditionally governmental and highly coercive power, akin to the government’s power to tax, to arrest individuals, and to license. It is, therefore, a very public power.
In particular, the delegation of this very public power to private, non-profit and charitable corporations has escaped the scrutiny that for-profit private actors have attracted in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in …
Institutional Repositories And The Principle Of Open Access: Changing The Way We Think About Legal Scholarship, Carol A. Parker
Institutional Repositories And The Principle Of Open Access: Changing The Way We Think About Legal Scholarship, Carol A. Parker
ExpressO
Open access to scholarship, that is, making scholarship freely available to the public via the Internet without subscription or access fees, is a natural fit for legal scholarship given our tradition of making government and legal information available to citizens, and the many benefits that flow from freely disseminating information for its own sake. Law schools, journals and scholars should espouse the principle of open access to legal scholarship, not only for the public good, but also for the enhanced visibility it provides journals and authors. Open access can be accomplished by archiving digital works in online institutional repositories. Legal …
Power Or Prudence: Which Is It?, Lisa A. Dolak
Power Or Prudence: Which Is It?, Lisa A. Dolak
ExpressO
In limiting patent litigants’ access to the declaratory judgment remedy, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has primarily invoked the “actual controversy” requirement imposed by the U.S. Constitution and the federal Declaratory Judgment Act. However, an examination of Federal Circuit decisions and those of the district courts reveals that the courts have often confused, or blurred the distinction between, constitutional requirements and the discretion the Act affords the federal courts to decline to exercise jurisdiction. Specifically, the courts often attribute constitutional significance to factors that instead bear on policy.
It is important to distinguish between jurisdictional limits …
Undoing The Native American Graves And Repartriation Act, Lori N. Wight
Undoing The Native American Graves And Repartriation Act, Lori N. Wight
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Not A Living Room Sofa: Changing The Legal Status Of Companion Animals, Susan J. Hankin
Not A Living Room Sofa: Changing The Legal Status Of Companion Animals, Susan J. Hankin
ExpressO
Although the law has traditionally treated non-human animals as property, public attitudes and many of our current laws already are beginning reflect many ways in which animals, and especially companion animals, are fundamentally different from inanimate property. Despite these trends, the differences between animals and inanimate property need to be more clearly reflected in our laws, because there are still too many cases where the results under current laws are inconsistent with this understanding of companion animals.
This article proposes the legislative creation of a new status that formally recognizes companion animals as a distinct legal category: “companion animal property.” …
When Should Judges Appoint Experts?: A Law And Economics Perspective, Jonathan T. Tomlin, David Cooper
When Should Judges Appoint Experts?: A Law And Economics Perspective, Jonathan T. Tomlin, David Cooper
ExpressO
The Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals placed federal judges in the role of “gatekeepers” empowered to evaluate the reliability of often complex expert testimony. Many judges, commentators, and legal scholars have argued that court-appointed experts can assist judges in appropriately carrying out their gatekeeping role. However, previous literature has not evaluated the role of court-appointed experts in a rigorous framework that considers the complex interaction of the incentives of expert witnesses, the impact of expert witnesses on the decision-making of the fact finder, and the knowledge of the judge. In this article, we provide such a …
Unwarranted Fears Mask The Benefits Of Network Diversity: An Argument Against Mandating Network Neutrality, Elvis Stumbergs
Unwarranted Fears Mask The Benefits Of Network Diversity: An Argument Against Mandating Network Neutrality, Elvis Stumbergs
ExpressO
The rapid development of the Internet has necessitated an update to Federal telecommunications laws. Recent Congressional efforts to enact such an update, however, have spawned a fiery debate over a somewhat nebulous concept: network neutrality. The debate concerns the way that Internet access providers handle the data traffic being sent over their networks. These providers would like the option to offer some of their customers, web site hosting companies and similar entities, additional services that would essentially result in these customers’ content loading faster, more reliably, or more securely than others not receiving such priority treatment. Yet, this proposed “diversity” …
Leeway For Judicial Usurpation: Ignoring The Default Of The Elections Clause In The Texas Redistricting Cases, Troy Allen Mccurry
Leeway For Judicial Usurpation: Ignoring The Default Of The Elections Clause In The Texas Redistricting Cases, Troy Allen Mccurry
ExpressO
The Supreme Court has had a difficult time in deciding how to handle the issue of partisan gerrymandering, a legislative procedure practiced since our nation’s founding. Oscillating in the past half century, they have ruled non-racial gerrymandering as both nonjusticiable and justiciable, but never with an agreement to a standard of unconstitutionality. Lower courts have struggled to apply the Court’s confusing decisions pragmatically and have been forced to nearly always dismiss such cases, but debate continues as to whether courts should be addressing this is at all. Some argue that the Constitution expressly leaves congressional districting to the state legislatures …
The "American Rule" That Swallows The Exception, Joseph E. Slater
The "American Rule" That Swallows The Exception, Joseph E. Slater
ExpressO
The “American” rule of employment at-will cripples the effectiveness of the two most important exceptions to that doctrine, the National Labor Relations Act and Title VII. Scholars often cite at-will as an area in which exceptions swallow the rule but ignore the opposite effect the rule has in undermining rights widely viewed as fundamental. This article goes beyond the standard critiques of the NLRA and Title VII and uses two other areas of law to make this case. The impact of at-will on private sector labor rights under the NLRA is shown by comparing public sector employment. Public sector labor …
Toward An International Criminal Procedure: Due Process Aspirations And Limitations, Gregory S. Gordon
Toward An International Criminal Procedure: Due Process Aspirations And Limitations, Gregory S. Gordon
ExpressO
The breathtaking growth of international criminal law over the past decade has resulted in the prosecution of Balkan and Rwandan mass murderers, the development of a substantial body of atrocity law jurisprudence and the creation of a permanent International Criminal Court with jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. The growth of international criminal procedure, unfortunately, has not kept pace. Among its shortcomings, critics have pointed to lengthy pre-trial detention without a real possibility of provisional release, the use of affidavits and transcripts instead of live witnesses at trial, the absence of juries, and the right of prosecutorial …
The Group Dynamics Theory Of Executive Compensation, Michael B. Dorff
The Group Dynamics Theory Of Executive Compensation, Michael B. Dorff
ExpressO
The corporate governance debate has focused recently on executive compensation. While defenders of the status quo assert that CEO compensation – and corporate governance generally -- is efficient, critics contend that boards have been captured by powerful CEOs who demand excessive pay unconditioned on their performance. Both sides argue that the evidence garnered from CEO compensation justifies their positions on legal reform of corporate governance as a whole. Defenders of the status quo argue that the system works well as is, as demonstrated by the enormous success of U.S. corporations. Critics concerned about managerial power propose reforms that will increase …
Vol. 31, No. 02 (September 5, 2006)
Digital Consumption Tax (D-Ct), Richard Thompson Ainsworth
Digital Consumption Tax (D-Ct), Richard Thompson Ainsworth
Faculty Scholarship
Modern technology is dramatically changing the way consumption taxes are collected, but it is also changing the way policymakers assess the operation and impact of these taxes. Whether the design is a standard credit-invoice value added tax (VAT) of European design, or a retail sales tax (RST) of American design, or the credit subtraction VAT without invoices type of consumption tax (CT) of Japanese design, technology is having a profound impact.
Government certified transaction software is in place in the United States. The Streamlined Sales Tax offers taxpayers in 18 states the option of having their retail sales tax determined …
Appeal No. 0742: B & B Petroleum V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0742: B & B Petroleum V. Division Of Mineral Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2004-88
Amendment No. 1 To The Amended And Restated Gila River Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Agreement (2006), Gila River Indian Community, Et Al
Amendment No. 1 To The Amended And Restated Gila River Indian Community Water Rights Settlement Agreement (2006), Gila River Indian Community, Et Al
Native American Water Rights Settlement Project
No abstract provided.
The Essential Holding Of Casey: Rethinking Viability, Randy Beck
The Essential Holding Of Casey: Rethinking Viability, Randy Beck
ExpressO
The joint opinion in Casey v. Planned Parenthood included dicta reaffirming the rule that abortion rights extend to the point of fetal viability. This manuscript argues that the Court has never offered an adequate rationale for the viability standard, an unusually permissive line when compared with abortion laws in other countries. The Court's normal obligation to justify the lines it draws is augmented in light of the disparate impacts generated by the viability rule, which attributes constitutional significance to a characteristic that tends to vary with the race and gender of the fetus. The viability standard can also be challenged …
Section 7525’S Last Gasps: The Tax Practitioner Privilege And The Selective Waiver Doctrine, Amandeep S. Grewal
Section 7525’S Last Gasps: The Tax Practitioner Privilege And The Selective Waiver Doctrine, Amandeep S. Grewal
ExpressO
Congress blundered badly by defining the Federally Authorized Tax Practitioner privilege by cross-reference to the attorney-client privilege. The relationship between a client and a FATP is wholly different from that between a client and an attorney, and the application of attorney-client principles to the FATP privilege has given rise to confused (and sometimes contradictory) judicial opinions.
This paper attempts to stem the confusion with respect to one aspect of the FATP privilege. The proper application of the selective waiver doctrine to the FATP privilege remains an open question, though courts seem poised to reject it. They have rejected it numerous …
A Defense Of Structural Injunctive Remedies In South African Law, Danielle E. Hirsch
A Defense Of Structural Injunctive Remedies In South African Law, Danielle E. Hirsch
ExpressO
This Article argues that the use of structural injunction remedies by South African courts is appropriate, and, in light of demonstrated government inaction, often necessary in order to give meaning to the protection of socio-economic rights, which is mandated by their Constitution. The Article draws upon numerous United States judicial decisions where structural injunctions have been successfully implemented to address systemic institutional inaction and violations of the equal protection and due process clauses of the United States Constitution. In numerous instances, the South African government has not acted to effectively give meaning to the socio-economic rights which were broadly declared …
Cyberstalking, A New Crime: Evaluating The Effectiveness Of Current State And Federal Laws, Naomi Harlin Goodno
Cyberstalking, A New Crime: Evaluating The Effectiveness Of Current State And Federal Laws, Naomi Harlin Goodno
ExpressO
Imagine a distressed woman discovering the following message on the Internet that was falsely attributed to her: “Female International Author, no limits to imagination and fantasies, prefers group macho/sadistic interaction . . . stop by my house at [current address] . . . . Will take calls day or night at [current telephone number] . . . I promise you everything you ever dreamt about. Serious responses only.” This is an example of cyberstalking – which involves the use of the Internet, e-mail, or other means of electronic communication to stalk another individual. Current statistics suggest that tens of thousands …
The Immigrant City, Rick Su
The Immigrant City, Rick Su
ExpressO
Jurists, policymakers, and legal scholars often do not consider the issue of immigration from a local perspective. As such, the intersection between immigration and local government law has largely been neglected in the legal academic literature. Instead of subscribing to the conventional belief that immigration and local governments are doctrinally distinct, this article uncovers their latent intersection, explore how competing but often unexamined concerns about local governments in legal doctrine conceal the mutual impact that immigration and local government laws have upon one another, and use this analysis to explore how legal rules can be changed to enhance the positive …
Taking "Justice And Fairness" Seriously: Distributive Justice And The Takings Clause, Jeffrey M. Gaba
Taking "Justice And Fairness" Seriously: Distributive Justice And The Takings Clause, Jeffrey M. Gaba
ExpressO
Since the 1960 case of Armstrong v. United States, the Supreme Court has repeatedly stated that “the” purpose of the Takings Clause is to prevent burdens falling on individual landowners that should in “justice and fairness” be born by society as a whole. The essay argues that this embodies a concept of distributional justice and further argues that the Court has failed to adequately consider the implications of such a conception as the basis of Takings analysis. The essay, after describing the origins of the Armstrong principle, discusses four implications: first, the rejection of a rights- based conception of the …
Re-Thinking Trade And Human Rights, Andrew T. Lang
Re-Thinking Trade And Human Rights, Andrew T. Lang
ExpressO
The last decade has seen the development of a burgeoning literature on the relationship between international trade and the protection of human rights, driven in part by a series of influential reports produced by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Some human rights commentators have been heavily critical of the trade regime, pointing to a variety of ways in which obligations under international trade law purportedly undermine the ability of governments to fulfil their human rights obligations. Others see the potential for strong synergies between the two regimes, and argue that international trade can be a …
Legal Pluralism & Women's Rights: A Study In Post-Colonial Tanzania, Edward R. Fluet, Mark J. Calaguas, Cristina M. Drost
Legal Pluralism & Women's Rights: A Study In Post-Colonial Tanzania, Edward R. Fluet, Mark J. Calaguas, Cristina M. Drost
ExpressO
Recognizing a dearth of legal research on Zanzibar, the authors explore the complex legal and cultural landscape of this archipelago and its relationship to mainland Tanzania. The article discusses the problems that arise when multicultural societies adopt a pluralist system of justice in order to preserve the traditions of its diverse communities. Although the article focuses on Tanzania, the problems that arise from multicultural accommodations affect not only young, postcolonial nations in Africa and Asia, but also individuals in cosmopolitan, economically-developed countries such as Israel and the United States. As countries wrestle with ever diversifying ethnic and religious populations, such …
Every Law Maintains An Important Fact: The Supreme Doctrine Of The New Fourth Constitutional Epoch, John H. Ryskamp
Every Law Maintains An Important Fact: The Supreme Doctrine Of The New Fourth Constitutional Epoch, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
Every law maintains an important fact: out of the political welter this doctrine has emerged as the supreme doctrine of the new fourth Constitutional epoch. It is widely understood that the scrutiny regime instituted by West Coast Hotel v. Parrish, is but one of three which have determined applications of the Constitution since its ratification. However, what is less widely known is that three recent cases illustrate how the third epoch has ended and the concerns of the new epoch. Currently the cases are litigated in terms of the meaning of, every, maintain and important.
Peeking Behind The Iron Curtain: How Law "Works" Behind Prison Walls, Donald F. Tibbs
Peeking Behind The Iron Curtain: How Law "Works" Behind Prison Walls, Donald F. Tibbs
ExpressO
The prison disciplinary process plays a major role in maintaining institutional order. It starts from the premise that the safety of the institution trumps the punishment of the inmate. Given the massive incarceration rates in virtually every part of the United States, most prisons are overcrowded and, therefore, forced to place a premium on order and safety. The only way to maintain order and safety is to have prison rules that deter inmate behavior; and the only way to enforce those rules is fairly and humanely.
Peeking Behind the Iron Curtain is a study of the law-in-action. Using a variety …
Enforcing Foreign Summary/Default Judgments: The Damoclean Sword Hanging Over Pro Se Canadian Corporate Defendants? Case Comment On U.S.A. V. Shield Development, Antonin I. Pribetic
Enforcing Foreign Summary/Default Judgments: The Damoclean Sword Hanging Over Pro Se Canadian Corporate Defendants? Case Comment On U.S.A. V. Shield Development, Antonin I. Pribetic
ExpressO
Following the 2003 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Beals v. Saldanha, where the “real and substantial connection” test is otherwise met (i.e. consent-based jurisdiction, presence-based jurisdiction or assumed jurisdiction) the only available defences to a domestic defendant seeking to have a Canadian court refuse enforcement of a foreign judgment are fraud, public policy and natural justice. The 2005 Ontario decision in United States of America v. Shield Development Co., presents an opportunity to critically analyze the defence of natural justice through a juxtaposition of American and Canadian procedural law. The thesis is that procedural justice mandates that “form follow …
A New Clean Water Act, Paul Boudreaux
A New Clean Water Act, Paul Boudreaux
ExpressO
The Supreme Court’s new federalism has struck its strongest blows so far on the Clean Water Act. This summer, in Rapanos v. United States, a sharply divided Court nearly struck down a large chunk of the Act’s protection of wetlands and other small waterways – five years after an earlier decision had narrowed the reach of the Act because of its supposed overreaching into state prerogative. Why has the Clean Water Act been the Court’s favorite target? One reason is that the statute was fatally flawed when enacted. Congress chose to cover “navigable waters,” but its practical definition has never …
Searches & The Misunderstood History Of Suspicion & Probable Cause: Part One, Fabio Arcila
Searches & The Misunderstood History Of Suspicion & Probable Cause: Part One, Fabio Arcila
ExpressO
This article, the first of a two-part series, argues that during the Framers’ era many if not most judges believed they could issue search warrants without independently assessing the adequacy of probable cause, and that this view persisted even after the Fourth Amendment became effective. This argument challenges the leading originalist account of the Fourth Amendment, which Professor Thomas Davies published in the Michigan Law Review in 1999.
The focus in this first article is upon an analysis of the common law and how it reflected the Fourth Amendment’s restrictions. Learned treatises in particular, and to a lesser extent a …