Law Commons^™

How To Give An Old Song A New License: A Recently Adopted Alternative To Rodgers And Hammerstein Organization V. Umg Recordings, Jacqueline M. Allshouse-Hutchens

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Gouging: Terrorist Attacks, Hurricanes, And The Legal And Economic Aspects Of Post-Disaster Price Regulation, Geoffrey C. Rapp

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Clifford V. Commonwealth: Admission Of Racial Voice Identification Testimony, Regressive Or Progressive?, D. Christopher Robinson

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

When Liberty And Security Collide: Foreign Policy Litigation And The Federal Judiciary, Kirk A. Randazzo

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Can Corporations Be Held Liable Under The Alien Tort Claims Act?, Kelsy Deye

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Consistency Of Sosa: A Comparison Of The Supreme Court's Treatment Of Customary International Law With Other Types Of Federal Common Law, Dana Howard

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

A Door Ajar Or A Floodgate?: Corporate Liability After Sosa V. Alvarez-Machain, Tim Kline

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Implications Of The Small V. United States Decision, Anwar K. Malik

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Court Of Appeals For The Fifth Circuit 2004-2005 Disposition Of Insurance Decisions: A Survey And Statistical Review, Willy E. Rice

Faculty Articles

he Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decided twenty-four insurance-related cases between June 2004 and April 2005. Those cases originated in nine federal district courts. Unlike its 2002-2004 rulings, the Court of Appeals did not decide any exceptionally novel or complex substantive or procedural questions. In fact, the Fifth Circuit issued four extremely short per curiam decisions, and in two other cases, presented brief analyses and dispositions of statutes-of-limitations and exhaustion-of-administrative-remedies questions under Louisiana’s law. Although the remaining eighteen cases present a diverse body of law and legal issues, only the more novel and highly questionable Fifth Circuit insurance …

The Limits Of Limiting Liability In The Battle Of The Forms: U.C.C. Section 2-207 And The “Material Alteration” Inquiry, Colin P. Marks

Faculty Articles

The “surprise or hardship” approach to UCC section 2-207 is the approach courts should use to determine the applicability of liability clauses in the battle of the forms. However, courts use varying approaches to decide whether clauses limiting liability materially alter the contract under UCC section 2-207. Courts have adopted three different approaches: (1) the per se material alternation approach; (2) the per se not material alternation approach; and (3) the “surprise or hardship” approach.

The per se material alteration approach focuses on the surprise or hardship factors found in comment 4 of section 2-207; however, that approach is flawed …

Contractors On The “Battlefield”: Providing Adequate Protection, Anti-Terrorism Training, And Personnel Recovery For Civilian Contractors Accompanying The Military In Combat And Contingency Operations, Jeffrey F. Addicott

Faculty Articles

American civilian employees serving overseas in hostile environments are dying because their parent companies and the U.S. military are failing to provide adequate protection, antiterrorism (“AT”) training, or both. Contractors must be properly informed, trained, and equipped not only to understand their own rights and obligations, but also to understand those of the U.S. military and the parent contractor company because of the physical dangers inherent in such asymmetrical conflicts. Specified AT training is not a mandatory component of contractor deployment, leaving many contract personnel ill-prepared and under-equipped to operate in locations plagued by the threat of car bombs, suicide …

Chinese Law On Sars By Chenglin Liu (Book Review), Vincent R. Johnson

Faculty Articles

Chinese Law on SARS, by Chenglin Liu, is a marvelous example of fresh scholarship about a new and important feature of the Chinese legal system. The book analyzes the Chinese response to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (“SARS”) epidemic in 2003. Most notably, it examines the government’s passing of two new laws and the implementation of other legal steps to bolster the nation’s public health system.

Liu’s scholarly examination of the SARS legislation is instructive, not merely because it explains the current laws in China relating to SARS, but also because it offers insight into what a country should (and …

Life In The Early Days Of Lawyer Advertising: Personal Recollections Of A Bates Baby, Gerald S. Reamey

Faculty Articles

The Supreme Court decision in Bates v. State Bar of Arizona ruled that lawyer advertising is commercial speech subject to First Amendment protection. However, a Texas disciplinary statute provided that “a lawyer shall not publicize himself, his partner, or associate…through newspaper or magazine advertisements, radio or television announcements…or other means of commercial publicity.” Despite being clearly unconstitutional, the Texas statute remained law for five years. Finally, responding to Bates in September 1977, the Texas State Bar Board of Directors adopted an official statement which allowed for limited advertising in newspapers, and only to the extent which was provided for by …

Legal History Resources, Kurt Metzmeier

Faculty and Staff Scholarship

A bibliographic essay on resources for the study of Kentucky legal history.

Commentary: Former West Side Stables And Proposed East Side Tower Spawn Controversy, Ross Sandler

Other Publications

No abstract provided.

Family Boundaries: Third-Party Rights And Obligations With Respect To Children, Joanna L. Grossman

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

No abstract provided.

The Food And Drug Administration's Evolving Regulation Of Press Releases: Limits And Challenges, William W. Vodra, Nathan Cortez, David E. Korn

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has developed an informal framework for regulating press releases by drug and medical device companies. FDA asserted jurisdiction over press releases based on its authority over labeling and advertising, and over the past 20 years, the agency has both broadened and scaled back its claims to authority over press statements.

Despite a somewhat predictable framework for anticipating how FDA regulates press materials, the agency's approach appears to be in flux. FDA will not tolerate false or misleading statements in press materials, but there are legal and practical limits to its regulation in this area. …

Designer Trials, Elizabeth G. Thornburg

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

This article considers the intersection of freedom of contract and the trials that have not vanished. Could contracting parties effectively agree in advance of a dispute that any litigation of the case will comply with certain rules? Would such an agreement be enforced even in a contract of adhesion? If so, parties with sufficient bargaining leverage could design away many of the characteristics of litigation that they find unappealing, without the need to resort to private processes. The result: a designer trial with the procedural deck stacked in favor of the party with the greatest pre-dispute bargaining power.

Such a …

Just Say 'No Fishing': The Lure Of Metaphor, Elizabeth G. Thornburg

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

The phrase "fishing expedition" is widely used in popular culture and in the law. In the case of metaphorical "fishing" in the law, reliance on the metaphor can act as a substitute for rigorous analysis, disguising the factors that influence a result. When used by the court, it is uninformative. Worse, the fishing metaphor may itself shape the way the court thinks about the kind of issue or claim involved. Accusations of "fishing" also affect the language and position of the litigants. Parties arguing against pleadings or discovery use the metaphor as a rhetorical weapon, stigmatizing their opponents, instead of …

The Legal Limits Of Universal Jurisdiction, Anthony J. Colangelo

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

Despite all the attention it receives from both its supporters and critics, universal jurisdiction remains one of the more confused doctrines of international law. Indeed, while commentary has focused largely and unevenly on policy and normative arguments either favoring or undercutting the desirability of its exercise, a straightforward legal analysis breaking down critical aspects of this extraordinary form of jurisdiction remains conspicuously missing. Yet universal jurisdiction's increased practice by states calls out for such a clear descriptive understanding. This Essay engages this under-treated area. It offers to explicate a basic, but overlooked, feature of the law of universal jurisdiction: If …

Ownership And Possession In The Early Common Law, Joshua C. Tate

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

Much has been written on the possible influence of Roman or canon law on the early English common law of property. Maitland thought that the canonist's actio spolii was the inspiration for the assize of novel disseisin. Sutherland argued that the assize borrowed from the Roman interdict unde vi. Milsom, by contrast, thinks that the early common-law writs must be understood within a feudal framework, and that the early common law took nothing from Roman law than the Latin language.

This Article offers a new perspective on ownership and possession in the early common law. It examines the theoretical development …

Unanimously Wrong, Dale Carpenter

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

The Supreme Court was unanimously wrong in Rumsfeld v. FAIR. Though rare, it's not the first time the Court has been unanimously wrong. Its most notorious such decisions have come, like FAIR, in cases where the Court conspicuously failed even to appreciate the importance of the constitutional freedoms under attack from legislative majorities. In these cases, the Court's very rhetoric exposed its myopic vision in ways that now seem embarrassing. Does FAIR, so obviously correct to so many people right now, await the same ignominy decades away? FAIR was wrong in tone, a dismissive vox populi, adopted by a Court …

Applying The Laws Of Logic To The Logic Of Laws, Hillel J. Bavli

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

The article begins by discussing the difficulties of proving consistency within a formal legal system generally. After establishing the importance of a formalized legal model as a prerequisite of rigorous examination of consistency, it proceeds to investigate issues intrinsic to the current system of law that may prevent formalization of a just legal system as currently conceived. The article argues that flexibility inherent in a just legal system may foreclose the possibility of legal formalization or any comprehensive model thereof. The article concludes, however, that a model whose purpose is the examination of consistency within a system need not necessarily …

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 23, Iss. 3

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Merck V. Integra And Its Aftermath: A Safe Harbor For The Commercial Use Of Biotechnology Research Tools?, Brendan M. O'Malley

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

History Turned "Sideways": Granholm V. Heald And The Twenty-First Amendment, Harris Danow

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Masthead - Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 24 (2006)

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 24, Iss. 1

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Introduction To David Nimmer's Modest Proposal, Justin Hughes

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

"We-Intention" And The Limits Of Copyright, Lior Zemer

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.