Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (29)
- BLR (13)
- Columbia Law School (7)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- Cornell University Law School (5)
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (5)
- Brooklyn Law School (4)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (4)
- University of Baltimore Law (4)
- University of Missouri School of Law (4)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (4)
- Roger Williams University (3)
- University of San Diego (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Florida International University College of Law (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Pace University (2)
- UIC School of Law (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Montana (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Duke Law (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Montclair State University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal Law and Procedure (27)
- Criminal law (9)
- Sentencing (9)
- Evidence (8)
- Sixth Amendment (8)
-
- United States Supreme Court (7)
- Punishment (5)
- Capital punishment (4)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Crawford v. Washington (4)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Criminal justice (4)
- Death penalty (4)
- Fifth Amendment (4)
- Law and Economics (4)
- Witnesses (4)
- Admissibility (3)
- Apprendi (3)
- Blakely (3)
- Booker (3)
- Confrontation Clause (3)
- Criminal procedure (3)
- Cross-examination (3)
- Due process (3)
- Federal sentencing guidelines (3)
- Gideon v. Wainwright (3)
- Juries (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Prison (3)
- Publication
-
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (29)
- Faculty Scholarship (17)
- All Faculty Scholarship (9)
- Articles (8)
- Faculty Publications (8)
-
- George Mason University School of Law Working Papers Series (6)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers (5)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (4)
- Working Paper Series (4)
- Scholarly Articles (3)
- University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Faculty Law Review Articles (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Publications (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Working Paper Series (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (1)
- Law & Economics Working Papers Archive: 2003-2009 (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
Articles 121 - 135 of 135
Full-Text Articles in Law
Constitutional Right Against Excessive Punishment, The, Youngjae Lee
Constitutional Right Against Excessive Punishment, The, Youngjae Lee
Faculty Scholarship
When is a death sentence, a sentence of imprisonment, or a fine so "excessive" or "disproportionate" in relation to the crime for which it is imposed that it violates the Eighth Amendment? Despite the urgings of various commentators and the Supreme Court's own repeated, albeit uncertain, gestures in the direction of proportionality regulation by the judiciary, the Court's answer to this question within the past few decades is a body of law that is messy and complex, yet largely meaningless as a constraint. In the core of this ineffectual and incoherent proportionality jurisprudence lies a conceptual confusion over the meaning …
An Analysis Of The Nypd's Stop-And-Frisk Policy In The Context Of Claims Of Racial Bias, Andrew Gelman, Alex Kiss, Jeffrey Fagan
An Analysis Of The Nypd's Stop-And-Frisk Policy In The Context Of Claims Of Racial Bias, Andrew Gelman, Alex Kiss, Jeffrey Fagan
Faculty Scholarship
Recent studies by police departments and researchers confirm that police stop racial and ethnic minority citizens more often than whites, relative to their proportions in the population. However, it has been argued stop rates more accurately reflect rates of crimes committed by each ethnic group, or that stop rates reflect elevated rates in specific social areas such as neighborhoods or precincts. Most of the research on stop rates and police-citizen interactions has focused on traffic stops, and analyses of pedestrian stops are rare. In this paper, we analyze data from 175,000 pedestrian stops by the New York Police Department over …
Developmental Incompetence, Due Process, And Juvenile Justice Policy, Elizabeth S. Scott, Thomas Grisso
Developmental Incompetence, Due Process, And Juvenile Justice Policy, Elizabeth S. Scott, Thomas Grisso
Faculty Scholarship
In 2003, the Florida District Court of Appeal reversed the murder conviction and life sentence imposed on Lionel Tate, who was twelve years old when he killed his six-year-old neighbor. Since Lionel was reported to be the youngest person in modern times to be sent to prison for life, the case had generated considerable debate, and the decision was appealed on several grounds. What persuaded the appellate court that the conviction could not stand, however, was the trial court's rejection of a petition by Lionel's attorney for an evaluation of his client's competence to assist counsel and to make a …
The Decline Of The Juvenile Death Penalty: Scientific Evidence Of Evolving Norms, Jeffery Fagan
The Decline Of The Juvenile Death Penalty: Scientific Evidence Of Evolving Norms, Jeffery Fagan
Faculty Scholarship
Shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Atkins v. Virginia holding that the execution of mentally retarded persons violated the Eighth Amendment, legal scholars, advocates, and journalists began to speculate that the Court would next turn its attention to the question of the execution of persons who were juveniles – below eighteen years of age – at the time they committed homicide. Following the Atkins decision, four Justices expressed the view that the rationale of Atkins also supported the conclusion that execution of juvenile offenders was unconstitutional. A constitutional test of capital punishment for juveniles was inevitable. …
Sentencing: Learning From, And Worrying About, The States, Gerard E. Lynch
Sentencing: Learning From, And Worrying About, The States, Gerard E. Lynch
Faculty Scholarship
The Columbia Law Review's Symposium on sentencing, which took place less than two weeks after the Supreme Court's dramatic semi-invalidation of the federal sentencing guidelines, was certainly timely. Nevertheless, it is critical to understanding the Symposium's purposes to realize that it was not planned in response to United States v. Booker, or even to Blakely v. Washington. The Symposium was conceived before either case was decided, as a very conscious attempt to steer the discussion of sentencing away from Congress and the federal guidelines and toward states' experiences. The vast majority of criminals are sentenced in state …
Racial Threat, Urban Conditions And Police Use Of Force: Assessing The Direct And Indirect Linkages Across Multiple Urban Areas, Karen F. Parker, John M. Macdonald, Wesley G. Jennings, Geoffrey P. Alpert
Racial Threat, Urban Conditions And Police Use Of Force: Assessing The Direct And Indirect Linkages Across Multiple Urban Areas, Karen F. Parker, John M. Macdonald, Wesley G. Jennings, Geoffrey P. Alpert
Faculty Publications
Traditionally explanations of police use of force have relied on a racial threat perspective. Tests of this perspective, however, typically offer a single indicator of threat (the relative size of the black population) and fail to adequately take into account the complex relationship between racial threat and police use of force. Drawing on racial threat, social disorganization, and police use of force literature, this study hypothesizes that macro-level patterns in police use of force are embedded in the racial and structural composition of cities and the organizational climate of local politics and police departments. The present study examines these relationships …
Summary Of Foster V. State, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 20, Debra L. Pieruschka
Summary Of Foster V. State, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 20, Debra L. Pieruschka
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Troy Anthony Foster, appellant, was charged with four counts of sexual assault and one count of kidnapping. A jury found Foster guilty of three counts of sexual assault and acquitted him on one count of sexual assault and of kidnapping. Foster appealed his conviction asserting five assignments of error. The Nevada Supreme Court rejected Foster’s contentions concluding in part the evidence presented at trial was more than sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict. Foster then filed a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus in district court, claiming ineffective assistance of both trial and appellate counsel. The district court …
Summary Of Garcia V. State , Justin L. Carley
Summary Of Garcia V. State , Justin L. Carley
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Ramon Garcia appealed his convictions for: (1) burglary while in possession of a firearm, (2) robbery with the use of a deadly weapon, (3) first-degree kidnapping, 4. conspiracy to commit burglary, (5) another burglary while in the possession of a firearm, 6. conspiracy to commit robbery, (7) attempted robbery with the use of a deadly weapon, and 8. false imprisonment. Garcia argued that: (1) the jury instruction on false imprisonment was improper, (2). the state presented insufficient evidence to support a verdict on kidnapping and false imprisonment, (3) the district court erroneously failed to hold a hearing on his motion …
Summary Of Hymon V. State, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 23, Bryson D. Perkins
Summary Of Hymon V. State, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 23, Bryson D. Perkins
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
In April 2001, Hymon stole a purse from a woman in the lobby of an auto repair shop. He ran, and two of the shop’s mechanics pursued him. They caught up to him when he fell on the curb, but he stood and swung a four- to six-inch long pocketknife. They backed away, allowing him to escape, but the police apprehended him shortly thereafter. After Hymon requested to represent himself, the district court conducted a Faretta canvass,2 and concluded that Hymon was competent to waive his right to counsel. Hymon was uncooperative and unwilling to communicate with the prosecutor, so …
Summary Of State V. District Court (Jackson), 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 4, Kenneth E. Hogan
Summary Of State V. District Court (Jackson), 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 4, Kenneth E. Hogan
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Petitioner, seeking a writ of mandamus, contended that the district court abused its discretion by awarding defendant credit against her prison sentence for time served on house arrest as a condition of bail.
Protecting The Innocent: The Massachusetts Governor's Council Report, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Protecting The Innocent: The Massachusetts Governor's Council Report, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Grappling With The Meaning Of 'Testimonial', Richard D. Friedman
Grappling With The Meaning Of 'Testimonial', Richard D. Friedman
Articles
Crawford v. Washington, has adopted a testimonial approach to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. Under this approach, a statement that is deemed to be testimonial in nature may not be introduced at trial against an accused unless he has had an opportunity to cross-examine the person who made the statement and that person is unavailable to testify at trial. If a statement is not deemed to be testimonial, then the Confrontation Clause poses little if any obstacle to its admission.2 A great deal therefore now rides on the meaning of the word "testimonial."
Confrontation After Crawford, Richard D. Friedman
Confrontation After Crawford, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
The following edit excerpt, drawn from "The Confrontation Clause Re-Rooted and Transformed," 2003-04 Cato Supreme Court Review 439 (2004), by Law School Professor Richard D. Friedman, discusses the impact, effects, and questions generated by the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Crawford v. Washington last year that a defendant is entitled to confront and cross-examine any testimonial statement presented against him. In Crawford, the defendant, charged with attacking another man with a knife, contested the trial court's admission of a tape-recorded statement his wife made to police without giving him the opportunity to cross-examine. The tiral court admitted the statement, and …
A Criminal Procedure Regime Based On Instrumental Values: A Review Of 'About Guilt And Innocence: The Origins, Development, And Future Of Constitutional Criminal Procedure,' By Donald A. Dripps (Prager Publishers, 2003), Tracey Maclin
UF Law Faculty Publications
Like many legal academics, Professor Donald Dripps believes that the Supreme Court's criminal procedure doctrine is a mess. Dripps believes that the Court's doctrine "is in large measure responsible for the failure of the criminal-procedure revolution" and contends that "current doctrine does not reflect prevailing (and justified) values about criminal process." To prove his claim, Dripps has written a book that expertly identifies the flaws, inconsistencies and missteps of the Court's constitutional criminal procedure cases dating back to the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. "About Guilt and Innocence: The Origins, Development, and Future of Constitutional Criminal Procedure" is a comprehensive …
Earl Warren: Law Enforcement Leads To Defendants' Rights, Yale Kamisar
Earl Warren: Law Enforcement Leads To Defendants' Rights, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Before becoming governor of California, Earl Warren spent 22 years in law enforcement: five as a deputy district attorney (1920- 25); thirteen as head of the Alameda County district attorney's office (1925-38); and four as state attorney general (1939-42). My thesis is that Warren's many years in law enforcement significantly affected his work as Chief Justice of the United States.