Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (6)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
-
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Louisiana State University (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Portland State University (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Connecticut (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (3)
- Capital punishment (2)
- Codifying defenses (2)
- Consolidating offenses (2)
- Criminal law codification (2)
-
- Death penalty (2)
- Defining offenses (2)
- Drafting (2)
- Empirical studies (2)
- Grading offenses (2)
- Litigation rates (2)
- Model Penal Code (2)
- Modern criminal codes (2)
- Prisoners (2)
- Prisons (2)
- Recodification (2)
- 18 USC 7 (1)
- Access to the courts (1)
- Accountability of lawyers (1)
- Actions (1)
- Actuarial model (1)
- Adjudicative facts (1)
- Administrative Office of the United States Courts (1)
- Ann Bilansky (1)
- Apprendi v. New Jersey (1)
- Arbitrariness (1)
- Book review (1)
- Capital cases (1)
- Chaska (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
Articles 31 - 31 of 31
Full-Text Articles in Law
Prosecutors And Their Agents, Agents And Their Prosecutors, Daniel C. Richman
Prosecutors And Their Agents, Agents And Their Prosecutors, Daniel C. Richman
Faculty Scholarship
This Article seeks to describe the dynamics of interaction between federal prosecutors and federal enforcement agents, and to suggest how these dynamics affect the exercise of enforcement discretion. After considering the virtues and pitfalls of both hierarchical and coordinate organizational modes, the Article offers a normative model that views prosecutors and agents as members of a "working group," with each side monitoring the other. It concludes by exploring how this model can be furthered or frustrated with various procedural and structural changes.