Law Commons^™

The Illegal Immigration Reform And Immigrant Responsibility Act Of 1996: Another Congressional Hurdle For The Courts, Sonia Chen

Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Issue 1, Chicago-Kent Law Review

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.

The History And Politics Of Second Amendment Scholarship: A Primer, Carl T. Bogus

Chicago-Kent Law Review

The introductory Article to this Symposium reviews the history and politics of Second Amendment scholarship, beginning in 1960, when the first article endorsing the individual right model was published, challenging what had previously been the accepted view that the Second Amendment grants only a collective right to keep and bear arms within the government-organized militia. Bogus describes how gun rights organizations embarked on a bootstrap campaign to develop a large body of writing supporting the individual right model, much of it by lawyers directly employed by or representing gun rights organizations, and then argued that the sheer mass of this …

To Hold And Bear Arms: The English Perspective, Lois G. Schwoerer

Chicago-Kent Law Review

This Article discusses the English background to the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and undertakes to contest the prevailing opinion that the old medieval English duty of service in the militia, imposed theoretically on all males between the age of sixteen and sixty, was transformed at the time of England's Glorious Revolution in 1688–89 into the right of the individual to keep and bear arms. The author of that thesis, Professor Joyce Malcolm of Bentley College in Massachusetts, maintains that Article VII of the Declaration of Rights, 1689 (better known as the Bill of Rights, its …

The Second Amendment In Action, Michael A. Bellesiles

Chicago-Kent Law Review

There are those who argue that the Second Amendment guarantees an unrestricted individual right to gun ownership. If the original intention of the framers of the Constitution and Bill of Rights is to inform contemporary debates, then we must know more about the historical context in which these documents were written. This Article explores the nature and extent of gun laws at the time the Second Amendment was ratified by the states, as well as those laws passed in the shadow of this Amendment. The continuing efforts of states to control access to and use of guns once the Second …

What Does The Second Amendment Mean Today?, Michael C. Dorf

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Proponents of the "individual right" interpretation of the Second Amendment frequently contend that those who disagree with this view apply a double standard, dismissing robust protection for individual firearms ownership and possession, while recognizing rights with less support. However, the Second Amendment has not been unfairly orphaned. The courts and commentators that reject the individual right scholars' claims are justified in doing so by the application of the same criteria commonly applied to other constitutional provisions, namely: doctrine; text; original understanding; structural inference; post adoption history; and normative considerations.

Rice V. Paladin Enterprises: Why Hit Man Is Beyond The Pale, Beth A. Fagan

Chicago-Kent Law Review

This Comment examines the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Rice v. Paladin Enterprises, Inc., which held that the publisher of a criminal instruction manual could be held liable for civil aiding and abetting without running afoul of the First Amendment. Fagan analyzes the traditional rationales for protecting free speech to determine the appropriate level of protection for criminal instruction manuals and focuses on Hit Man: A Technical Manual for Independent Contractors, the book that facilitated the murders at issue in Rice. She assesses the First Amendment value of Hit Man and balances that value against …

Health Care Law: Breaking Down The Boundaries Of Malpractice Law, Philip G. Peters Jr.

Faculty Publications

Historically, courts have treated professional malpractice cases as unique. When disputes that would otherwise have been governed by tort rules of general application have arisen in the context of medical treatment, courts have routinely constructed special rules for the resolution of those disputes. Recent evidence suggests that this penchant for special rules may be weakening and that malpractice law may be slowly melting back into the sea of tort doctrine.The three Missouri health care law cases noted in this issue are the latest evidence that courts today are more willing to resolve medical negligence actions using tort rules of general …

Restricting Public Employees' Political Activities: Good Government Or Partisan Politics?, Rafael Gely, Timothy D. Chandler

Faculty Publications

The article starts by reviewing, in Part II, the history of the regulation of political activities by public employees, and in Part III, the regulation of patronage. Part IV develops the argument that both sets of regulations, although justified on different grounds, are better understood as political control mechanisms. Part V provides some empirical evidence for this argument by examining voting patterns on federal legislation restricting public employees' political activities. Part VI discusses the relationship of these laws to public sector unionization. Part VII concludes the article.

The Second Amendment: The Highest Stage Of Originalism, Jack N. Rakove

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Originalism is the theory of constitutional interpretation that holds that the meaning of the various provisions of the Constitution was fixed at the moment of their adoption, and that the goal of interpretation is to recover that historical meaning and apply it to current disputes. No subject of current constitutional controversy is more closely tied to originalist theories of interpretation than the debate over the meaning of the Second Amendment. But for all the lip service given to originalism and all the homage Americans pay to the wisdom of the founders, there is little agreement among scholars as to how …

Disarmed By Time: The Second Amendment And The Failure Of Originalism, Daniel A. Farber

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Originalism provides the core arguments for an individual right "to keep and bear Arms." The appropriate role of original intent in constitutional law, however, has been debated for the past two decades. In this Article, Farber illustrates how the Second Amendment exemplifies the classic, well-known criticisms of originalism. This does not prove, of course, that the conventional understanding of the Second Amendment should be retained. But, Farber concludes, advocates for a drastic expansion of Second Amendment rights will need something beyond the ambiguous historical record if they wish to show why, in today's world, gun rights warrant constitutional protection.

Why Should Gang Membership Be A Status Symbol? Status Crimes And City Of Chicago V. Youkhana, Mark D. Brookstein

Chicago-Kent Law Review

In City of Chicago v. Morales, the Supreme Court struck down Chicago's anti-gang loitering ordinance on void-for-vagueness grounds. As a result, the Court did not answer the question left open by the Illinois Court of Appeals in City of Chicago v. Youkhana of whether the ordinance criminalized the status of being a gang member in violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. This Comment considers the question by examining the historical backdrop of status offenses as it relates to both constitutional and common law precedent. In order to determine whether an otherwise constitutional reenactment of …

The H-2a Non-Immigrant Visa Program: Weakening Its Provisions Would Be A Step Backward For America's Farmworkers, Cecilia Danger

University of Miami Inter-American Law Review

No abstract provided.

Outcomes, Reasons, And Equality, Christopher J. Peters

All Faculty Scholarship

In this article, Christopher Peters responds to arguments made by Kenneth Simons in The Logic of Egalitarian Norms, 80 B.U. L. REV. 693 (2000), in which Professor Simons defends the normative value of equal treatment against Peters’s earlier critiques. Peters first explains and justifies his attack on deontological rather than consequentialist motivations for equal treatment. He then articulates a difference between two distinct conceptions of “treatment”: an outcome-focused and an holistic conception. Peters argues that the holistic conception must be accepted by anyone who defends a deontological theory of equality. Peters then explains how certain of Simons’s arguments in defense …

Response To Susan Vivian Mangold's Extending Non-Exclusive Parenting And The Right To Protection For Older Foster Care Children: Creating Third Options In Permanency Planning, Lishone Bowsky

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

Stop The Presses: Censorship And The High School Journalist, Scott Andrew Felder

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

Analysis Of High School Newspaper Editorials Before And After Hazelwood School District V. Kuhlmeier: A Content Analysis Case Study, Carol S. Lomicky

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

Does Nala Provide Rights Or Merely Rites, Perry A. Zirkel

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

The Impact Of The Native American Languages Act On Public School Curriculum: A Different View, Jim Littlejohn

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments In The Law - Supreme Court Review

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments In The Law - Primary And Secondary Education

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments In The Law - Learning Disabilities

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

Law Review Digests

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

The Knox V. Knox Decision And Drug Testing For Public School Employees: Why Educators Do Not Shed Their Rights At The Schoolhouse Gate, Ginger Orr

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

Part-Time Public School Attendance And The Freedom Of Religion: Yoder's Impact Upon Swanson, Jeff Prather

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

Horizons

The Journal of Law and Education

No abstract provided.

Independence And The Director Of Public Prosecutions: The Marshall Inquiry And Beyond, Philip C. Stenning

Dalhousie Law Journal

The author describes the reforms to the prosecution system in Nova Scotia which were recommended by the Marshall Inquiry in its 1989 report, and reviews the extent to which they have been effectively implemented during the ensuing decade. He concludes that many of the objectives originally identified by the Marshall Inquiry in this respect have been substantially met, but that in some areas there is still room for improvement. Finally, he notes the absence of systematic evaluations of prosecutorial institutions and practices in Canadian jurisdictions, and that because of this, it is difficult to say whether the Marshall Inquiry's objectives …

The Americans With Disabilities Act And Academic Libraries In The Southeastern United States, Linda Lou Wiler, Eleanor Lomax

E-JASL: Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship (1999-2009, Volumes 1-10)

Individuals with disabilities are one of the fastest-growing segments of United States society. In 1970, 11.7% of the United States population was limited in activity, a major factor in measuring and identifying people with disabilities. In 1990, because of the aging of America, 13.7 % of the population could be so identified. By 1994, 15% of the population fell into this group. During this latter period, the older population stayed fairly stable but children and younger adults with disabilities increased greatly. Many different figures, depending upon the method of counting, e.g., age groups included, or whether residence was in a …

Has Wright Line Gone Wrong? Why Pretext Can Be Sufficient To Prove Discrimination Under The National Labor Relations Act,, Michael Hayes

All Faculty Scholarship

Every year in the United States, thousands of employees are illegally fired for joining or supporting unions. These employees must bring their claims to the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”), which applies its famous Wright Line standard to decide thousands of discrimination cases each year.

Probably the most common issue in labor discrimination cases is “pretext.” In virtually every case, an employer claims that it fired an employee not for an illegal anti-union motive, but for a legitimate business reason. The pretext issue arises when the evidence shows that the legitimate reason asserted by the employer was most likely …