Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University (12)
- UIC School of Law (10)
- Seattle University School of Law (7)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (6)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (6)
-
- University of Richmond (5)
- Mercer University School of Law (4)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Campbell University School of Law (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Labor and employment law (6)
- Americans with disabilities act (5)
- Labor unions (5)
- Disability (4)
- Discrimination in employment (4)
-
- Employment Law (4)
- Bragdon v. abbott (3)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (3)
- Employment (3)
- Labor arbitration (3)
- National Labor Relations Board (3)
- Collective bargaining (2)
- Corporations (2)
- Discrimination against people with disabilities in employment (2)
- E-mail (2)
- Employee Benefits (2)
- Employee fringe benefits (2)
- Genetic discrimination (2)
- Genetic diseases (2)
- Hiv (2)
- International Labor Organization (2)
- International labor law (2)
- Law -- Interpretation & construction (2)
- Legal ethics (2)
- Strikes & lockouts (2)
- Supreme court (2)
- Symposium (2)
- Title VII (2)
- Attorneys' fees (1)
- Employee benefits (1)
- Publication
-
- Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal (12)
- UIC Law Review (10)
- Seattle University Law Review (7)
- Journal of Health Care Law and Policy (6)
- Villanova Law Review (5)
-
- Mercer Law Review (4)
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Buffalo Women's Law Journal (1)
- Campbell Law Review (1)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (1)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Jeffrey S. Moorad Sports Law Journal (1)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Oklahoma Law Review (1)
- RISK: Health, Safety & Environment (1990-2002) (1)
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (1)
- Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest (1)
- Richmond Public Interest Law Review (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Washington International Law Journal (1)
Articles 61 - 76 of 76
Full-Text Articles in Law
An Analysis Of The Nlrb's "Runaway Shop" Doctrine In The Context Of Mid-Term Work Relocation Based On Union Labor Costs, Jan W. Sturner
An Analysis Of The Nlrb's "Runaway Shop" Doctrine In The Context Of Mid-Term Work Relocation Based On Union Labor Costs, Jan W. Sturner
Hofstra Labor & Employment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Sexual Harassment In The Workplace: How Arbitrators Decide , Mollie H. Bowers, E. Patrick Mcdermott
Sexual Harassment In The Workplace: How Arbitrators Decide , Mollie H. Bowers, E. Patrick Mcdermott
Cleveland State Law Review
For thirty years courts and labor arbitrators have grappled with what constitutes sexual harassment and how to remedy such behavior. The Federal judiciary has developed case law on sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. However, arbitrators addressing this issue under collective bargaining agreements have often treated similar fact patterns differently than jurists. In contrast, labor arbitrators decide culpability first, and then consider the appropriate remedy. In reconciling these separate paths for establishing standards of workplace conduct, the authors will provide a model that explains how arbitrators decide sexual harassment cases and how this model …
The Supreme Court Reins In The Americans With Disabilities Act, Stephen W. Jones
The Supreme Court Reins In The Americans With Disabilities Act, Stephen W. Jones
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Toleration Of Unjustified Distinctions Between The Mentally And Physically Disabled In Lewis V. Kmart Corp. Makes One Thing Clear: Not All Disabilities Were Created Equal, Donna M. Orzell
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
I Can't Work, Just Kidding, I Can: The Effects That Applying For Disability Benefits Have On An Ada Claim, John Bisordi
I Can't Work, Just Kidding, I Can: The Effects That Applying For Disability Benefits Have On An Ada Claim, John Bisordi
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supervisory Sexual Harassment And Employer Liability: The Third Circuit Sheds Light On Vicarious Liability And Affirmative Defenses, David F. Mccann
Supervisory Sexual Harassment And Employer Liability: The Third Circuit Sheds Light On Vicarious Liability And Affirmative Defenses, David F. Mccann
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Iadimarco V. Runyon And Reverse Discrimination: Gaining Majority Support For Majority Plaintiffs, Maria A. Citeroni
Iadimarco V. Runyon And Reverse Discrimination: Gaining Majority Support For Majority Plaintiffs, Maria A. Citeroni
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note will argue that the Supreme Court should resolve the inconsistency within the federal system concerning the appropriate standard of proof in reverse discrimination disputes by adopting the reasoning set forth by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Section II will profile the history and purpose of Title VII, with emphasis on the "burden shifting" framework established by the Supreme Court to analyze claims of racial discrimination in the workplace. Section III will contrast the development of the "background circumstances" test applied by lower federal courts to discrimination claims brought by majority plaintiffs with the Supreme Court's recognition of …
Retaliatory Discharge For Attorney-Employees In Private Practice: To Do, Or Not To Do, The Right Thing, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 383 (2000), Terri Martin Kirik
Retaliatory Discharge For Attorney-Employees In Private Practice: To Do, Or Not To Do, The Right Thing, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 383 (2000), Terri Martin Kirik
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Bitch V. Whore: The Current Trend To Define The Requirements Of An Actionable Hostile Environment Claim In Verbal Sexual Harassment Cases, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 465 (2000), Jamie Lynn Cook
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Piercing The Corporate Veil To Recover Pension Payments: It's Time To Address The Issue, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 497 (2000), Nella Disanto
Piercing The Corporate Veil To Recover Pension Payments: It's Time To Address The Issue, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 497 (2000), Nella Disanto
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Pullman Strike: Yesterday, Today, And Tomorrow, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 583 (2000), William J. Adelman, Gerald E. Berendt, Melvin G. Holli
The Pullman Strike: Yesterday, Today, And Tomorrow, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 583 (2000), William J. Adelman, Gerald E. Berendt, Melvin G. Holli
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
"Bad For Business": Contextual Analysis, Race Discrimination, And Fast Food, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 207 (2000), Regina Austin
"Bad For Business": Contextual Analysis, Race Discrimination, And Fast Food, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 207 (2000), Regina Austin
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Silencing Speech In The Workplace: Re-Examining The Use Of Specific Speech Injunctive Relief For Title Vii Hostile Environment Work Claims, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 321 (2000), Sonali Das
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Kimel V. Florida Bd. Of Regents, 120 S. Ct. 631(2000), Tanya Smith
Kimel V. Florida Bd. Of Regents, 120 S. Ct. 631(2000), Tanya Smith
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Anjelino V. New York Times Co.: Granting Men Standing To Fight Against Injuries Received As A Result Of Sexual Discrimination Towards Female Co-Workers, Christine Coyne
Anjelino V. New York Times Co.: Granting Men Standing To Fight Against Injuries Received As A Result Of Sexual Discrimination Towards Female Co-Workers, Christine Coyne
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Avoiding The Trap Of Res Judicata: A Practitioner's Guide To Litigating Multiple Employment Discrimination Claims In The Third Circuit, Victoria L. Hooper
Avoiding The Trap Of Res Judicata: A Practitioner's Guide To Litigating Multiple Employment Discrimination Claims In The Third Circuit, Victoria L. Hooper
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.