Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (10)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- Cornell University Law School (5)
- Selected Works (5)
- Mercer University School of Law (4)
-
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (3)
- University of Kentucky (3)
- University of Washington School of Law (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- UC Law SF (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- Brigham Young University Law School (1)
- Chapman University Dale E. Fowler School of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Penn State Law (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- Wayne State University (1)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Scientific evidence (16)
- Evidence (11)
- Expert witnesses (8)
- Admissibility (5)
- Hearsay (5)
-
- Witnesses (5)
- Court (3)
- Cross-examination (3)
- Economics (3)
- Empirical legal studies (3)
- Expert (3)
- Expert testimony (3)
- Frye v. United States (3)
- Litigation (3)
- Science (3)
- Testimony (3)
- United States Supreme Court (3)
- Antitrust law (2)
- Character evidence (2)
- Civil trials (2)
- Confessions (2)
- Confrontation Clause (2)
- Custodial interrogations (2)
- Discovery (2)
- Email (2)
- Expert evidence (2)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (2)
- Jury reforms (2)
- KRE (2)
- Kentucky Rules of Evidence (2)
- Publication
-
- Washington and Lee Law Review (10)
- Articles (6)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Mercer Law Review (4)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Washington Law Review (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- Frank R. Herrmann, S.J. (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Oklahoma Law Review (2)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (2)
- Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law (1)
- Dr Matilda Arvidsson (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Louise Harmon (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Susanna K. Ripken (1)
- Thomas D. Lyon (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- Trisha Olson (1)
- University of Miami Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 69 of 69
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Costs Of Confidentiality And The Purpose Of Privilege, Melanie B. Leslie
The Costs Of Confidentiality And The Purpose Of Privilege, Melanie B. Leslie
Articles
No abstract provided.
The Suggestibility Of Children: Scientific Research And Legal Implications, Stephen J. Ceci, Richard D. Friedman
The Suggestibility Of Children: Scientific Research And Legal Implications, Stephen J. Ceci, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In this Article, Professors Ceci and Friedman analyze psychological studies on children's suggestibility and find a broad consensus that young children are suggestible to a significant degree. Studies confirm that interviewers commonly use suggestive interviewing techniques that exacerbate this suggestibility, creating a significant risk in some forensic contexts-notably but not exclusively those of suspected child abuse-that children will make false assertions of fact. Professors Ceci and Friedman address the implications of this difficulty for the legal system and respond to Professor Lyon's criticism of this view recently articulated in the Cornell Law Review. Using Bayesian probability theory, Professors Ceci and …
Lilly V. Virginia Glimmers Of Hope For The Confrontation Clause?, Richard D. Friedman
Lilly V. Virginia Glimmers Of Hope For The Confrontation Clause?, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In 1662, in The Case of Thomas Tong and Others, which involved charges of treason against several defendants, the judges of the King's Bench conferred on a crucial set of points of procedure. As reported by one of the judges, Sir John Kelyng, the judges agreed unanimously that a pretrial confession made to the authorities was evidence against the Party himself who made the Confession, and indeed, if adequately proved could support a conviction of that party without additional witnesses to the treason itself. But -- again unanimously, and quite definitively -- the judges also agreed that the confession cannot …
Dna As Evidence: Viewing Science Through The Prism Of The Law, Peter Donnelly, Richard D. Friedman
Dna As Evidence: Viewing Science Through The Prism Of The Law, Peter Donnelly, Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In this article, we analyze a problem related to DNA evidence that is likely to be of great and increasing significance in the near future. This is the problem of whether, and how, to present evidence that the suspect has been identified through a DNA database search. In our view, the two well-known reports on DNA evidence issued by the National Research Council (NRC) have been badly mistaken in their analysis of this problem. The mistakes are significant because the reports have carried great authority with American courts; moreover, the DNA Advisory Board of the FBI has endorsed the second …
Roman And Canonical Roots Of Hearsay Doctrine, Frank Herrmann
Roman And Canonical Roots Of Hearsay Doctrine, Frank Herrmann
Frank R. Herrmann, S.J.
No abstract provided.
A Continental Rule Against Hearsay, Frank Herrmann
A Continental Rule Against Hearsay, Frank Herrmann
Frank R. Herrmann, S.J.
No abstract provided.
The Harvest, Louise Harmon
5. Child Witnesses And The Oath: Empirical Evidence., Thomas D. Lyon
5. Child Witnesses And The Oath: Empirical Evidence., Thomas D. Lyon
Thomas D. Lyon
Malexandertalet: Ett Tal - Två Situationer, Matilda Arvidsson
Malexandertalet: Ett Tal - Två Situationer, Matilda Arvidsson
Dr Matilda Arvidsson
In this article the court speech delivered by the "Malexander widow", Anneli Ljungberg, is analysed in terms of Lloyd Bitzers "rhetorical situation" and found to work within two different and simultaneous rhetorical situations. Thus, the article shows how a court speech might break with rhetorical conventions of one rhetorical situation because of the conventions governing the other and simultaneously ongoing rhetorical situation.