Law Commons^™

Jurisdiction And The Miller Obscenity Standard, Mark C. Alexander

Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Software As Speech, Dan L. Burk

Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Intellectual Privacy And Censorship Of The Internet, Julie E. Cohen

Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Liability For Third-Party Content On The Internet, Robert W. Hamilton

Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Encryption And Freedom Of Speech, Leonard T. Nuara

Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Applications Of The Privacy Protection Act, Mark Eckenwiler

Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Internet Libel, Michael Godwin

Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Personal Jurisdiction And The Internet: "Shoehorning" Cyberspace Into International Shoe, Michele N. Breen

Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal

No abstract provided.

World Wide Wager: The Feasibility Of Internet Gambling Regulation, John Edmund Hogan

Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Nii Copyright Act Of 1995: A Roadblock Along The Information Superhighway, Julie C. Smith

Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Constitution Of The United States Of America

Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Editorial Board - Vol. 8, No. 3 Summer 1998

Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Euthanasia, Morality, And Law Introduction, Lawrence B. Solum

Faculty Scholarship

The topic of euthanasia calls into question the proper relationship between morality and law. In this introduction, I shall focus our attention on two questions, the question of morality and the question of law. Consider first the question of morality. Citizens in a democratic society face a moral question, whether assisted suicide or euthanasia is ever the best choice-the choice that virtue requires. Each of us approaches this moral question from our own standpoint, from the moral and religious traditions in which we participate. And the question has different answers. Some of us believe strongly in the sanctity of human …

United States' Response To Puget Sound Shellfish Growers' Petition For Rehearing - United States V. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 96-35014, 96-35082, 96-35142, 96-35196, 96-35200, 96-35223 (135 F.3d 618 (9th Cir. 1998))

No abstract provided.

Appeal No. 0649: Cgas Exploration, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chie's Order 98-32

Site Visit To New Jersey — State And County Experiences With Welfare Reform And Access To Health Care, Michael Anzick, Richard Hegner

National Health Policy Forum

This site visit was the second in a series to examine what is occurring at the state and local level with respect to welfare reform, Medicaid, public health, and safety net and other supportive services. During this visit, policymaker discovered how state officials, directors, and front-line staff at urban and suburban county welfare offices are working with clients to move them off the welfare rolls into jobs and providing the support services necessary for job retention; heard from clients about how programmatic changes are affecting them and their families; learned how the role of safety net health care and temporary …

Praecipe--Change Of Address, Thomas R. Bartman

Sandia Pueblo Mountain Claim

No abstract provided.

Panel Discussions From "Indian Nations On The Eve Of The 21st Century, John P. Lavelle, Frank Pommersheim, Larry Long, James Abourezk, Christopher Schneider

Faculty Scholarship

On the afternoon of May 19, 1998, in the University of South Dakota School of Law Courtroom, two panels assembled to discuss current issues in Indian land and water rights. The panels were part of the Fifth Biennial Indian Law Symposium entitled "Indian Nations on The Eve of The Twenty-First Century: Sovereignty, Self-Government, Water Rights, Land Rights." Those panel discussions are reprinted here, with minor stylistic edits.

The first panel, dealing with water rights, included Mark Van Norman, Susan Williams, Robert Cournoyer, Tony Iron Shell, Professor John Davidson, and moderator Robert Gough.

The second panel, dealing with land rights, was …

Leonard Granados V. Marlene (Bear Stops) Granados, Frank Pommersheim

Tribal Court Opinions Authored by Emeritus Professor of Law Frank Pommersheim

No abstract provided.

Brief Letter Written Twenty-Five Years Ago Began Events Leading To Boshkoff To Teaching Honor

Leon Wallace (1951-1952 Acting; 1952-1966)

No abstract provided.

Rwu School Of Law Commencement (May 16, 1998), Roger Williams University School Of Law

School of Law Commencement (1996- )

No abstract provided.

The Forum (Volume 28, Number 9), Valparaiso University School Of Law

Valparaiso Law School Forum

No abstract provided.

153rd University Of Notre Dame Commencement And Mass Program, University Of Notre Dame

Commencement Programs

153rd University of Notre Dame Commencement and Mass Program including Law School awards

Cops Are Pigs, And Lawyers Suck: The Portrayal Of The Legal System In Young Adult Literature, Christine P. Bartholomew

Other Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Probate From The Ground Up, Oregon Law Institute, Shirley A. Bass, Stephen E. Kantor, Ron D. Bailey, Dean T. Sandow, Mark M. Williams, James R. Cartwright, Carolyn W. Miller, Richard A. Pagnano

Oregon Law Institute, 1998

Course Materials from the May 15, 1998 Program in Portland

Memorandum From University Of Illinois College Of Law Professor Ronald D. Rotunda Memorandum To The Honorable Kenneth W. Starr Regarding Whether A Sitting President Is Subject To Indictment [Portions Redacted], Ronald D. Rotunda

United States Department of Justice: Publications

Re: Indictability of the President, with particular respect to whether President Bill Clinton could be charged with indictable offenses while in federal office.

Excerpt from the New York Times article: “It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are not part of, and are contrary to, the president’s official duties,” the Starr office memo concludes. “In this country, no one, even President Clinton, is above the law.”

A Principaled Approach To Valuing Career Goodwill As Distributable Community Property, Brian K. Matise

Student Thesis Honors (1996-2008)

This essay presents the thesis that the enhanced earnings capacity of a career (human capital) that results from the investment of community labor and community funds during a marriage is an intangible asset, career goodwill, that can be valued in the same manner as other forms of goodwill. Other commentators, most notably Allen Parkman, have proposed valuing human capital in a similar manner. Courts have been inconsistent in their recognition of this goodwill because of conceptual difficulties in understanding the nature of goodwill and because courts fail to understand how to value this goodwill. The essay presents a principled approach …

Correspondence - "Re: Johnnie Rawlinson's Confirmation To U.S. District Court - May 12, 1998, Las Vegas Chapter Of The National Bar Association

Johnnie B. Rawlinson

No abstract provided.

Fax: The White House – May 7, 1998, Remarks By The President, Arab American Institute Conference, Office Of The Press Secretary

Saffy Collection - All Textual Materials

Bill Clinton’s speech for the Arab American Institute Conference May 7, 1998 at Grand Hyatt Hotel Washington, D.C.

Pollard Case Is One For The Legal Books, Kenneth Lasson

All Faculty Scholarship

Jonathan Pollard, the former Navy intelligence analyst who was convicted of passing classified information to Israel, has been behind bars for more than 12 years now. His life sentence - by far the harshest ever meted out for a similar offense - continues to make "equal justice under law" seem like little more than a palsied proverb.

Pollard's actions were clearly misguided and rightly punishable, but should he languish for life in prison while others obviously more perfidious have been set free? Americans who expect fairness in their judicial system should be sorely disillusioned at how grossly disproportionate Pollard's treatment …