Law Commons^™

The Constitution And Private Government: Toward The Recognition Of Constitutional Rights In Private Residential Communities Fifty Years After Marsh V. Alabama, Steven Siegel

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

This Article considers the application of the Supreme Court's state-action theory to residential commmunity associations (RCAs), a form of housing and community governance that has experienced extraordinary growth in recent years. Fewer than 500 RCAs were in existence in the United States before 1960. In the early 1990s, it was estimated that 32 million Americans lived in 150,000 RCAs. A continuing boom in RCA construction has led to predictions that twenty-five to thirty percent of Americans will be living in RCAs by early in the next century. Steven Siegel argues that this trend, although largely unnoticed, carries significant implications for …

Printz V. United States: Tenth Amendment Limitations On Federal Access To The Mechanisms Of State Government, Kevin Todd Butler

Mercer Law Review

In Printz v. United States, the Supreme Court addressed the Tenth Amendment's protection of state sovereignty, a significant issue in the contemporary debate on the nature of United States federalism. Striking a key provision of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act ("Brady Act") as unconstitutional, the Court expanded Tenth Amendment limitations on the federal government's access to the mechanisms of state government. The Court decision implicated issues bearing on the commerce power and the power of Congress to enlist state compliance with federal policy objectives.

Virginia Supreme Court Endorses Medical Confidentiality Claim, Paul A. Lombardo

Faculty Publications By Year

No abstract provided.

Appeal No. 0633: North Coast Energy, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 97-154

Appeal No. 0615: Donald E. Wood V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-63

Appeal No. 0619: Halwell Company, Cinc. (B.T. Energy Corporation) V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-76

Appeal No. 0617: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-66

Appeal No. 0620: Halwell Company (Bt Energy Corporation) V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-83

Appeal No. 0628: Halwell Company. Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-120

Appeal No. 0634: Michael Schafer V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-159 (Everflow Eastern)

Appeal No. 0616: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-62

Appeal No. 0618: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-78

Appeal No. 0621: Halwell Company, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-84

Appeal No. 0630: Kilbarger Construction, Inc. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-140

Appeal No. 0637: Robert W. Barr, Dba Big Sky Petroluem V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 97-201

Appeal No. 0607: Kenneth Parrill, Dba Hoyp-Parrill Company V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-91 & Chief's Order 97-1

Appeal No. 0641: Boocor Producing V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Review of Chief's Order 97-204

Appeal No. 0613: Poston Operating Co., V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-28

Appeal No. 0623: Max Becker, Dba Ruma, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-102

Appeal No. 0627: Barclay Petroleum, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-117

Appeal No. 0583: Kenneth Parrill, Dba Hoyt-Parrill Company V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 96-61 & Chief's Order 97-1

Appeal No. 0622: Alsid Oil & Gas Development Co. V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-77

Appeal No. 0631: Calvin & Paula Adkins V. Donald L. Mason, Chief, Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 97-152 (Cabot Oil & Gas)

Tough Love In The District: Management Reform Under The District Of Columbia Financial Responsibility And Management Assistance Act , Stephen R. Cook

American University Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Political Economy Of Cooperative Federalism: Why State Autonomy Makes Sense And "Dual Sovereignty" Doesn't, Roderick M. Hills Jr.

Michigan Law Review

It is commonplace to observe that "dual federalism" is dead, replaced by something variously called "cooperative federalism," "intergovernmental relations," or "marble-cake federalism." According to this conventional wisdom, state and local officials do not enforce merely their own laws in their distinct policymaking sphere. Rather, as analyzed in a voluminous literature, state and local governments also cooperate with the federal government in many policymaking areas, ranging from unemployment insurance to historic preservation. These nonfederal governments help implement federal policy in a variety of ways: by submitting implementation plans to federal agencies, by promulgating regulations, and by bringing administrative actions to enforce …

Codification—Town Of Yarmouth, Recodified January 15, 1998, Yarmouth (Me.). Municipal Officers

Maine Town Documents

An ordinance for revising, codifying, and compiling the general ordinances of the Town of Yarmouth.

Part I

Ch. 201 Administrative Code
Ch. 202 Planning Board Ordinance
Ch. 203 General Board of Appeals Ordinance
Ch. 301 Building Code
Ch. 302 Trailer and Trailer Camps Ordinance
Ch. 303 Fire Ordinance
Ch. 304 Sewerage Ordinance
Ch. 305 Shellfish Conservation Ordinance
Ch. 306 Solid Waste Ordinance
Ch. 307 Health Ordinance
Ch. 308 Harbor Waterfront and Boat Ordinance
Ch. 309 Dog Control Ordinance
Ch. 310 Peddlers Ordinance
Ch. 311 Electrical Code
Ch. 312 Public Property Licensing Ordinance
Ch. 313 Septic Tank Septage Processing Ordinance
Ch. …

Foreword: Cities On The Cutting Edge, David Jung

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Attorney-Client Privilege And The Work-Product Doctrine In Michigan, D. A. Celphane, Barbara Mcquade, Leonard Niehoff, Daniel P. Malone

Books

In Upjohn Co v. United States, the United States Supreme Court acknowledged that the attorney-client privilege - the "oldest of the privileges for confidential communications known to the common law" - has the crucial purpose of "encourag[ing] full and frank communication between attorneys and their clients and thereby promote[s] broader public interests in the observance of law and administration of justice." Similarly, in Hickman v Taylor, the Court stressed the importance of the work-product doctrine, noting that "[n]ot even the most liberal of discovery theories can justify unwarranted inquiries into the files and the mental impressions of an attorney." …

Toward A More Just And Predictable Civil Justice System, George N. Meros, Jr.

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Legislative Efforts To Limit State Reproductive Privacy Rights, Charlene Carres

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.