Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
-
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- Wayne State University (2)
- William & Mary Law School (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Campbell University School of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- UIdaho Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Denver (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (7)
- Clayton Act (3)
- Competition (3)
- Sherman Act (3)
- 1992 Cable Act (2)
-
- Antitrust law (2)
- Antitrust regulation (2)
- Cable Companies (2)
- Corporations (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Law (2)
- Price discrimination (2)
- Securities Law (2)
- 1984 Cable Act (1)
- AT&T (1)
- Africa (1)
- African Economic Community (1)
- Airline industry (1)
- Amici (1)
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (1)
- Antitriust (1)
- Antitrust Law (1)
- Antitrust damages (1)
- Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp (1)
- Aviation law (1)
- Bristol Steel and Iron Works v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. (1)
- Bruce's Juices v. American Can Co (1)
- Cable Act of 1992 (1)
- Cable Rates (1)
- Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act (1)
- Publication
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Federal Communications Law Journal (6)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Journal Articles (2)
- LLM Theses and Essays (2)
-
- Law Faculty Research Publications (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (2)
- Articles (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Campbell Law Review (1)
- David J. Gerber (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Maryland Law Review (1)
- Mercer Law Review (1)
- Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship (1)
- University of Baltimore Law Review (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 40 of 40
Full-Text Articles in Law
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
The False Duality Of Efficiency And Predation In The Analysis Of Monopolizing Conduct, Mark Anderson
The False Duality Of Efficiency And Predation In The Analysis Of Monopolizing Conduct, Mark Anderson
Articles
No abstract provided.
Imprudent Power: Reconsidering U.S. Regulation Of Foreign Tender Offers, Jill E. Fisch
Imprudent Power: Reconsidering U.S. Regulation Of Foreign Tender Offers, Jill E. Fisch
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
From Legitimacy To Logic: Reconstructing Proxy Regulation, Jill E. Fisch
From Legitimacy To Logic: Reconstructing Proxy Regulation, Jill E. Fisch
All Faculty Scholarship
On October 16, 1992, after a comprehensive review of its system of proxy regulation and after two separate amendment proposals that drew more than 1700 letters of comment from the public, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") voted to reform the federal proxy rules. The reforms were "intended to facilitate shareholder communications and to enhance informed proxy voting, and to reduce the cost of compliance with the proxy rules for all persons engaged in a proxy solicitation.' The SEC explained the amendments by stating that the rules were "impeding shareholder communication and participation in the corporate …
As Time Goes By: New Questions About The Statute Of Limitations For Rule 10b-5, Jill E. Fisch
As Time Goes By: New Questions About The Statute Of Limitations For Rule 10b-5, Jill E. Fisch
All Faculty Scholarship
In this Article. Professor Fisch examines the history and legacy of Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilberston, the controversial 1991 Supreme Court decision that established a federal statute of limitations for private causes of action brought under Rule 10b-5. In Part I Professor Fisch reviews the history of the 10b-5 statute of limitations prior to LampE Part II then analyzes both the issues resolved and questions raised by Lampf. Part III traces the congressional reaction to Lampf that culminated in the addition of section 27A to the Securities Act of 1934. In Part IV, Professor Fisch concludes by …
The Extraterritorial Application Of Antitrust Laws: A Postscript On Hartford Fire Insurance Co. V. California, Roger P. Alford
The Extraterritorial Application Of Antitrust Laws: A Postscript On Hartford Fire Insurance Co. V. California, Roger P. Alford
Journal Articles
Last year in the pages of this journal I published an article comparing the United States and the European Union (E.U.) approaches to the extraterritorial application of antitrust laws. In discussing the U.S. approach, I predicted that "while the jurisdictional rule of reason has its weaknesses, it will remain a lasting fixture on the legal landscape precisely because it represents the only genuine, though inexact, attempt by courts to fashion a jurisdictional test which incorporates the legitimate sovereignty interests of foreign nations." Thus, it was with disappointment that I, along with other proponents of a jurisdictional rule of reason, received …
Case Comments P. Monopolies Service & Training, Inc. V. Data General Corp.
Case Comments P. Monopolies Service & Training, Inc. V. Data General Corp.
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Case Comments T. Trade Regulation Anheuser-Busch V. L & L Wings
Case Comments T. Trade Regulation Anheuser-Busch V. L & L Wings
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Antitrust And Sports: Must Competition On The Field Displace Competition In The Market?, Joseph P. Bauer
Antitrust And Sports: Must Competition On The Field Displace Competition In The Market?, Joseph P. Bauer
Journal Articles
A casual glance at the daily newspapers would suggest that athletes and sports teams spend almost as much time squaring off in the courts as they do on the playing fields. Professional football players complain that the teams for which they play and the National Football League have conspired to impose illegal restraints on their ability to offer their services to other teams. A baseball team went to court to challenge the decision by the now-deposed Commissioner of Baseball to shift it from one division to another. College players, coaches, and universities all contend that various rules imposed by the …
Heinrich Kronstein And The Development Of United States Antitrust Law, David J. Gerber
Heinrich Kronstein And The Development Of United States Antitrust Law, David J. Gerber
David J. Gerber
No abstract provided.