Law Commons^™

Appeals On The Merits, Terence G. Ison

Osgoode Hall Law Journal

This article deals with the limitations of judicial review and the possibilities of its augmentation or replacement by a regime of appeals on the merits. The author questions some assumptions that are commonly made about appellate structures. He criticizes the "broad-brush approach" and warns that there is no panacea. The article explains why any broad regime of appeals on the merits from tribunals to courts of general jurisdiction is not an available option, and it discusses alternative structures of appeals to tribunals. Finally, it explains why it would be irresponsible to propose any appellate structure covering any substantive subject except …

The Efficacy Of The Tort System And Its Alternatives: A Review Of Empirical Evidence, Don Dewees, Michael J. Trebilcock

Osgoode Hall Law Journal

This paper reviews the existing empirical evidence on the efficacy of the tort system and alternatives to it. The evidence is evaluated against three normative goals: deterrence, corrective justice, and distributive justice. Empirical evidence relating to five major categories of accidents is reviewed: automobile accidents, medical malpractice, product related accidents, environmental injuries, and workplace injuries. In each case, the paper proceeds by reviewing empirical evidence on the deterrence and compensatory properties of the tort system, and then reviews parallel bodies of evidence on regulatory or penal alternatives and on compensatory alternatives to the tort system. The paper concludes that the …

National Institutes Of Health Workshop Statement. Reproductive Genetic Testing: Impact On Women, Karen H. Rothenberg, Elizabeth Thomson

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Law Of Guarantees In Singapore And Malaysia, Kee Yang Low

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

No abstract provided.

Race, Aggravated Murder, And The Death Sentence In Multnomah County, Oregon, 1984-1990 : A Descriptive Analysis And Review, Patrick Arthur Jolley

Dissertations and Theses

Criminal justice administrators in the United States have been challenged by a highly visible accusation of racial discrimination. This perception has weakened the confidence in, and support of, our judicial process. This study attempted to clarify this perception by examining the effect of race on certain judicial decisions related to the death penalty. The variables chosen for analysis focused on the persons involved in the homicide, the circumstances of the crime, and decisions made during the processing of capital cases.

Judicial Textualism Meets Congressional Micromanagement: A Potential Collision In Clean Air Act Interpretation, Michael E. Herz

Articles

No abstract provided.

Bankruptcy Theory And The Creditors' Bargain, David G. Carlson

Articles

The article critiques the traditional "simple creditors' bargain" theory in bankruptcy law, arguing that it fails to align with libertarian principles due to its inability to justify bankruptcy discharges and its exclusion of debtors and non-creditors. It then explores an "expanded creditors' bargain," which attempts to address distributive aspects but ultimately falls short by excluding non-consensual creditors and failing to explain why contractual risk allocation is insufficient. The analysis highlights the theory's shortcomings in handling various creditor types and risks, questioning its validity in explaining bankruptcy law.

Secured Creditors And Expenses Of Bankruptcy Administration, David G. Carlson

Articles

In any complex bankruptcy proceeding one of the most poignant questions facing the parties and the court is who must pay the trustee's expenses. In addition to routine administrative costs, such expenses may include costs of disposing of estate assets, or, in reorganization proceedings, expenses necessary to preserve the assets and going-concern value of the debtor's business. In this Article, Professor David Gray Carlson undertakes a comprehensive examination of the law of bankruptcy expense allocation through the lens of Bankruptcy Code section 506(c), the trustee's principle tool for charging expenses to secured creditors. After a careful examination of priority and …

Claims & Opinions An Exchange Of Views: Game Theory And Bankruptcy Reorganizations, David G. Carlson

Articles

No abstract provided.

An Interpretivist Agenda, Gary S. Lawson

Faculty Scholarship

As I write these words, bevies of law clerks assigned to cases involving the Bill of Rights are dutifully editing their bench memos for publication in the national reporter system. Once printed, these bench memos will be solemnly treated by lawyers, scholars, other law clerks, and the occasional judge who runs across them as legally significant, or even binding, interpretations of the Constitution. Two features of this burgeoning mass of otherwise unpublishable law review comments bear mention. First, most of them are tedious, tendentious, pretentious, and badly reasoned when reasoned at all, just as one would expect from authors who …

Foreword: The Constitution Of Responsibility, Steven G. Calabresi, Gary S. Lawson

Faculty Scholarship

The American legal academy is decidedly nationalistic. Comparative law tends to be a minor part of the law school curriculum, and discussion of alternative legal systems almost never finds its way into mainstream courses like constitutional law. As a result, much that is distinctive about American constitutionalism, and the American legal system in general, is often taken for granted. The federal Constitution, for example, says much about governmental structure, power, and limitations, but virtually nothing about the obligations of citizens to one another or to the government.' This feature of the American Constitution starkly sets it apart from many of …

The Poverty Of Privacy?, Linda C. Mcclain

Faculty Scholarship

This Article has two aims. First, it defends a continuing role for the right of privacy in arguments -for women's reproductive freedom against charges that privacy is an impoverished concept. Second, it raises cautions about certain feminist critiques of privacy that would ground this freedom in notions of reproductive responsibilities. As this Article was first presented at a conference, "Reproductive Issues in a Post-Roe' World," held in the wake of Webster v. Reproductive Health Services,2 the first question is: Are we now, given the Supreme Court's recent decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey,' in a "post-Roe world"? Furthermore, what remains …

L'Arbitrage Et Le Recouvrement Des Prêts Consentis À Des Débiteurs Étrangers, William W. Park

Faculty Scholarship

L'auteur explore le rile complexe de 'arbitrage dans le rglement des difflrends financiers intemationaux impliquant des dettes privies et publiques. II onus rappelle que le diveloppement 6conomique global bnlficie d'un climat de confiance dons les relations commerciales internationales. Los doctrines juridiques et les procidures qui ajoutent de l'incertitude dans le processus de remboursement des prfts ne peuvent que freiner I'allocation de crdits qui pourraient autrement favoriser le commerce et l'investissement outre-frontikre, particuli~rement dons les pays en vole do diveloppement.

The author explores the complex role of arbitration in the settlement of international financial controversies involving both private and public debt. …

Good Faith In English Law, Howard Hunter

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

'Good faith' is a term often used but rarely defined or analysed with care. In this short volume O'Connor has undertaken a formidable task: the development of a general principle of good faith that is applicable throughout English law. He begins with a proposed definition and then proceeds through brief analyses of the good faith concept in six areas of the law (administrative law, contracts, company law, criminal law, torts, trusts and property). He makes a quick excursion across the Channel to consider the civil law approach to the principle of good faith and then concludes with a chapter devoted …

Sticks And Stones Can Break My Name: Nondefamatory Negligent Injury To Reputation, Katharine B. Silbaugh

Faculty Scholarship

If a reputation is injured, does it matter whether defamation is the cause? Injury to reputation differs from other items of damage a plaintiff enumerates. Tradition links it to particular tortious conduct-defamation-on the part of a defendant. This Comment examines ordinary negligent conduct as an alternative ground for recovery for injury to reputation.

Proving The Law, Gary S. Lawson

Faculty Scholarship

Interpretative theory has become a major growth industry over the past two decades. Legal academics in particular have invested heavily in the enterprise, producing a burgeoning literature that addresses many of the most important problems of legal interpretation.1 The discussion to date, however, has largely neglected one critical aspect of interpretative theory: the selection of appropriate standards of proof for legal propositions. That neglect will not bother or surprise interpretative skeptics who doubt the utility of searching for "true" or "better" meanings of texts, but it ought to prove troubling to any theorist who wants to make absolute or comparative …

(Un)Luckey V. Miller: The Case For A Structural Injunction To Improve Indigent Defense Services, Rodger D. Citron

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

One Hundred Years Of Harmful Error: The Historical Jurisprudence Of Medical Malpractice, Theodore Silver

Scholarly Works

In this Article, Professor Silver examines the origins of present-day malpractice law. He begins by noting that negligence and medical malpractice as the common law now knows them made their debut in the nineteenth century although their roots lie deep in the turf of trespass and assumpsit. He argues, however, that toward the turn of the century several episodes of linguistic laziness purported to produce a separation between negligence and medical malpractice so that the two fields are conventionally thought to rest on separate doctrinal foundations. According to Professor Silver, historically based scrutiny of medical malpractice and its ties to …

On Bringing The Justice Mission Conference Back Home, Marjorie A. Silver

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

(Un)Luckey V. Miller: The Case For A Structural Injunction To Improve Indigent Defense Services, Rodger D. Citron

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

1992, W. Wapenhans, Ibrd, Review Of The Portfolio Review Working Group, Part 1, Willi Wapenshans

WBIP Creation Up To 1993

No abstract provided.

1992, W, Wapenhans, Report Of The Portfolio Review Working Group, Part 2, Willi Wapenhans

WBIP Creation Up To 1993

One of two parts of the "Wapenhans Report", which documented significant failures throughout the Bank's portfolio due to a culture of approval that preferences project quantity and moving money over project quality or development results. This was one of the primary studies that was cited by Bank critics as demonstrating the need for reforms, including the Inspection Panel

Title Page

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Table Of Contents - Issue 1

Journal of Dispute Resolution

No abstract provided.

Confidentiality In Mediation: A Moral Reassessment, Kevin Gibson

Journal of Dispute Resolution

In discussing mediation confidentiality, it appears that different commentators address different issues. For example, some commentaries discuss only court ordered mediation while others consider the possibility of any intervention by a neutral to be mediation, and hence under scrutiny. There is also disagreement about what should be protected: pre-mediation screening calls, post session discussions among mediators and their supervisors and so on.5 In order to keep the discussion as broad and inclusive as possible, I will use "mediation" to refer to any organized intervention by an impartial third party and to any part of that process. Although some may consider …

Just, Speedy, And Inexpensive Or Just Speedy And Inexpensive - Mandatory Alternative Dispute Resolution In The Western District Of Missouri, April A. Fredlund

Journal of Dispute Resolution

This Comment will address five questions which may arise as challenges to the Western District of Missouri's implementation of its ADR program. First, is the experimental program designed by the court likely to be predictive? That is, will the program be able to tell us whether cost and delay are being reduced by the ADR program? Second, is the program as implemented likely to reduce cost and delay? Third, does the Western District of Missouri have authority to impose mandatory ADR on litigants? Fourth, is the provision for mandatory ADR constitutionally sound? And fifth, assuming affirmative answers to these questions, …

Waiver Of A Contractual Arbitration Agreement By Causing Prejudice To The Opponent: Should Federal Courts Adopt A Bright-Line Test - Kramer V. Hammond, Mark G. Anderson

Journal of Dispute Resolution

Due to the high costs of litigation and the backlog on court dockets, parties to a contract are beginning to rely more and more on contractual provisions requiring arbitration for future disputes.2 In the past, courts were reluctant to enforce these provisions,' but now the federal courts enforce a strong presumption in favor of such provisions.' Because of this strong federal policy, waiver of the contractual agreements is not easily inferred.5 To overcome this presumption federal courts have developed tests to determine when waiver of contractual agreements to arbitrate occurs.6 These tests focus on whether the opposing party has been …

Shackling The Secretary's Hands: Limits To Authorizing Whistle-Blower Settlements Under Section 210 Of The Energy Reorganization Act - Macktal V. Secretary Of Labor, Jay M. Dade

Journal of Dispute Resolution

In seeking to encourage nuclear industry employees to report safety concerns, Section 210 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (ERA) acts to protect such "whistle-blowers" in the event they are terminated or discriminated against because of their whistle-blowing activities.2 When an employee and an employer negotiate a Section 210 "whistle-blower" complaint and subsequently submit the settlement for approval, the Secretary of Labor faces certain encumbrances when reviewing the agreement . This limitation on review arises when certain provisions may be in violation of public policy.4 In Macktal v. Secretary of Labor, the United States Court of Appeals for the …

Arbitrator And The Double Jeopardy Clause: Does The Postman Always Ring Twice - United States V. Reed, The, David A. Cole

Journal of Dispute Resolution

When an arbitrator's decision is adverse to one party, does the double jeopardy clause2 prohibit further pursuit of the claim by the successful party? With the rising emphasis being placed on arbitration clauses in collective bargaining agreements, it was only a matter of time before this question arose in the workplace. In United States v. Reed3 the Eleventh Circuit established the test for determining if an arbitrator's decision invokes the double jeopardy clause.

Using Genes To Define Motherhood - The California Solution, George J. Annas

Faculty Scholarship

Sometimes (although not often) new forms of medical technology raise unique legal and social-policy issues that require new laws. In vitro fertilization, followed by the transfer of the embryo to a woman who did not contribute the ovum, is such a technique, because when the child's gestational mother is not the child's genetic mother, society must decide which is the child's legal mother. A California Court of Appeal, the first appellate court anywhere in the world to rule on this issue, decided in late 1991 that genes determine motherhood.