Law Commons^™

The Myth Of The Cabinet System: The Need To Restructure Florida's Executive Branch, Joseph W. Landers, Jr.

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Adequate Public Facilities Requirements: Reflections On Florida's Concurrency System For Managing Growth, Thomas G. Pelham

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Res Ipsa Loquitur, Seton Hall University School Of Law

Newspapers

No abstract provided.

The Advocate, The Advocate, Fordham Law School

The Advocate

Public Interest Resource Center Holds First Annual Dinner; FSSF Auction Proceeds Matched by Dean; Coffee and Bias Talk at the South African Consulate

The Advocate, The Advocate, Fordham Law School

The Advocate

Advocate Folds!! Editors Immolate Selves; "We had to finally face it, Nothing ever happens here!" Editors Cry; X Society Goes Public!!

Re-Examining The Act Of State Doctrine: An Integrated Conflicts Analysis, Gregory H. Fox

Law Faculty Research Publications

No abstract provided.

Vol. 9, No. 2, Peter Feuille

The Illinois Public Employee Relations Report

Contents:

Reconciling Interest in Interest Arbitration: Facilitation and Adjudication, by Peter Feuille

Recent Developments, by the Student Editorial Board

Further References, compiled by Margaret A. Chaplan

Resource Law Notes Newsletter, No. 25, Spring Issue, Apr. 1992, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Resource Law Notes: The Newsletter of the Natural Resources Law Center (1984-2002)

No abstract provided.

Introduction, William S. Geimer

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Bunch V. Thompson 949 F.2d 1354 (1991)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Rogers V. Commonwealth 242 Va. 307,410 S.E.2d 621 (1991)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Opposing Peremptory Challenges Under Batson, Marcus E. Garcia, James W. Miller Jr.

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Mitigation: An Outline Of Law, Method And Strategy, Peter T. Hansen

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Virginia Supreme Court Death Penalty Cases

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Capital Defense Digest Articles Index

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Penumbral Reasoning On The Right, Glenn Harlan Reynolds

Scholarly Works

The use of penumbral reasoning in cases like Griswold v. Connecticut has received considerable criticism from so-called conservative constitutional commentators, most notably Robert Bork. This essay demonstrates that penumbral reasoning is also widely used by courts in service of results generally regarded as conservative, with much less controversy. Penumbral reasoning, it suggests, is an essential implement in the judicial toolbox, and worthy of more respect, and use, from courts that care about fidelity to constitutional text and structure.

Educational Accountability In Florida: Meaningful Reform Or Marginal Tinkering?, Anthony D. Demma, Jr.

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Joint Ventures, Inc. V. Department Of Transportation, 563 So. 2d 622 (Fla. 1990), Alan W. Roddy

Florida State University Law Review

Takings-ISN'T THERE A BETTER APPROACH TO PLANNED CONDEMNATIONS?

Patricia Ann Dore And The Florida Administrative Procedures Act, Stephen T. Maher

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Noncompete Agreements Under Florida Law: A Retrospective And A Requiem, Kendall B. Coffey, Thomas F. Nealon, Iii

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Civil Rights Agenda For The Year 2000: Confessions Of An Identity Politician, Fran Ansley

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

A Reevaluation Of The Canons Of Statutory Interpretation, Joseph H. Bates

Vanderbilt Law Review

This Symposium has its genesis in the Vanderbilt Law Review's inaugural symposium, A Symposium on Statutory Construction, published in 1950.' Although the 1950 Symposium included a Foreword by Justice Felix Frankfurter and contributions by several preeminent scholars in the field, Karl Llewellyn's clumsily titled but succinctly written Remarks on the Theory of Appellate Decision and the Rules or Canons About How Statutes are to be Construed has eclipsed the Symposium which brought it to light and has persevered as a highly influential, if not definitive, critique of the canons of statutory construction.

Llewelyn's article, in general, attacks legal formalism and …

Farewell, Ms. Dore, Talbot "Sandy" D'Alemberte, Stephen R. Macnamara

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Errata: 19 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1, 11 (1991)

Florida State University Law Review

Carrie Menkel-Meadow, Pursuing Settlement in an Adversary Culture: A Tale of Innovation Co-Opted or "The Law of ADR": at 11:

Error: However, there is some notion that what they are contracting out of -- the adjudicated result. It is known to them and is the result of a publicly controlled process.

Correction: However, there is some notion that what they are contracting out of -- the adjudicated result -- is known to them and the result of a publicly controlled process.

Patricia Ann Dore -- A Personal View, Thomas B. Gaines, Jr.

Florida State University Law Review

No abstract provided.

Newsletter Vol.20 No.2 1992, National Center For The Study Of Collective Bargaining In Higher Education And The Professions

National Center Newsletters

No abstract provided.

505 And All That—The Defendant’S Dilemma, Peter Jaszi

Law and Contemporary Problems

Section 505 of the Copyright Act of 1909 was carried forth, without substantive change, into the Copyright Act of 1976. An assessment of section 505 is presented.

Quarterly Report - Spring 1992, Nova University

The Quarterly Report

No abstract provided.

Where Have You Gone, Karl Llewellyn? Should Congress Turn Its Lonely Eyes To You?, Stephen F. Ross

Vanderbilt Law Review

Over forty years ago, in the Symposium we commemorate today, Professor Karl Llewellyn wrote a devastating critique of the canons of statutory construction. For virtually every canon of construction, he demonstrated that there was another canon that could be employed to reach the opposite result. His point was not to be critical, but to argue proscriptively that the process of statutory construction requires an interpretation in light of a judicial determination of "some assumed purpose."'

Other commentators, both before and after the publication of Llewellyn's magnificent contribution to the Vanderbilt Law Review, have taken a different approach. These observers have …

Modern Statutes, Loose Canons, And The Limits Of Practical Reason: A Response To Farber And Ross, Edward L. Rubin

Vanderbilt Law Review

Daniel Farber' and Stephen Ross, in separate contributions to this Symposium, raise the most crucial question in modern statutory interpretation, a question that exposes the profound triviality of the canons of statutory construction that Karl Llewellyn so effectively attacked. Ross points out that the legislature can control, or at least attempt to control, the judicial use of the canons by the way it drafts the statute and by effective use of supplementary materials such as mark-ups, committee reports, and floor debates. Farber, in his critique of formalism, demonstrates that formalist interpretation is an impediment to effective statutory drafting. Inherent in …