Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Cornell University Law School (9)
- University of Michigan Law School (9)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (4)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (4)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- University of Kentucky (2)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (2)
- Western New England University School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Mississippi College School of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- Valparaiso University (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (9)
- Articles (7)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Faculty Works (4)
-
- Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Publications (4)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (3)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (3)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Law & Economics Working Papers (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Continuing Legal Education Materials (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
Articles 61 - 66 of 66
Full-Text Articles in Law
Preclusion And Federal Choice Of Law, Gene R. Shreve
Preclusion And Federal Choice Of Law, Gene R. Shreve
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Should Federal Courts Give Greater Effect To State Judgments Than Would The Courts That Rendered Them?, Gene R. Shreve
Should Federal Courts Give Greater Effect To State Judgments Than Would The Courts That Rendered Them?, Gene R. Shreve
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Pendent Jurisdiction - The Problem Of "Pendenting Parties", William H. Fortune
Pendent Jurisdiction - The Problem Of "Pendenting Parties", William H. Fortune
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Federal courts have generally discouraged the joinder of a third party solely on the basis of a claim pendent to a federal cause of action. They have, however, been more liberal in allowing joinder in diversity cases. The author reviews the case law and argues that a more liberal attitude toward joinder should be adopted, except in diversity cases where, he believes, liberal joinder erodes the requirement of complete diversity.
The Consumer Class Action, Arthur H. Travers Jr., Jonathan M. Landers
The Consumer Class Action, Arthur H. Travers Jr., Jonathan M. Landers
Publications
No abstract provided.
Simplification Of Judicial Procedure In Federal Courts, Edson R. Sunderland
Simplification Of Judicial Procedure In Federal Courts, Edson R. Sunderland
Articles
In 1914 the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives unanimously reported favorably upon a bill (H. R. 133) authorizing the Supreme Court of the United States to prescribe by rule the forms, kind and character of the entire pleading, practice and procedure to be used in all actions and proceedings at law in the federal courts, with a view to their simplification, which rules should, when promulgated, take precedence of any law in conflict therewith. On January 2, 1917, a similar bill (S. 4551) was favorably reported from the Senate Judiciary Committee by a distinguished graduate of this Law …
Sane Procedural Reform, Robert E. Bunker
Sane Procedural Reform, Robert E. Bunker
Articles
In these later days much is said about reforming the procedure of our courts, about recalllng our judges, at arbitrarily appointed times, and about reversing their decisions by popular vote. Most of what is said about these matters is said by those who have least reason to say it. It is no exaggeration to assert that those who are most severe in their criticism of the courts and of their procedure and most lavish in their suggestions of reform are they who know little, beyond the most general, about the courts and nothing about their procedure from personal contact with …