Law Commons^™

Two Approaches For Evaluating A Debtor’S “Additional Circumstance” Under The Brunner Test To Qualify For A Hardship Discharge Of Student Loan Debt, Julie Aberasturi

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), student loan debt is typically non-dischargeable in bankruptcy, except for circumstances in which the failure to discharge “would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor’s dependents.” However, the Bankruptcy Code does not define “undue hardship.” Instead, Congress “left it up to the various Bankruptcy Courts to utilize their discretion in defining what that term means after an analysis of the statute and a review of applicable legislative history.”

In determining what constitutes an “undue hardship,” a majority of courts rely on the three-prong Brunner test …

Evaluating The Availability Of An Income-Driven Repayment Plan Under The Two Doctrinal Tests For Undue Hardship, Emily R. Fisher

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A fundamental goal of bankruptcy is to give the debtor a “fresh start” by discharging their debts. For student loan debtors in bankruptcy, the opportunity of a “fresh start” is limited. Under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), student loans are not dischargeable unless excepting such debt from discharge would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor’s dependents. Without guidance from the statutory text, the definition of undue hardship is left up to judicial interpretation, giving rise to much litigation.

An issue that frequently arises when undue hardship is litigated is the …

The High Burden Of A “Minimal Standard Of Living” Under The First Prong Of The Brunner Test, Samantha Alfano

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 523(a)(8) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), student loan debt is not dischargeable unless the debtor can show “undue hardship.” Courts have concluded that section 523(a)(8) creates a presumption that student loans are nondischargeable, finding that the burden of challenging this presumption rests upon the individual debtor. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Brunner v. New York State Higher Educ. Servs. Corp., articulated what has become the standard test (the “Brunner test”) for determining undue hardship. Subsequently, the Brunner test has been adopted by the …

Intangible Property Can Satisfy The Debtor Eligibility Requirement Under Section 109(A), Edward Cho-O’Leary

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 109(a) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) states that “only a person that resides or has a domicile, a place of business, or property in the United States … may be a debtor under this title.” While a “foreign entity or individual domiciled abroad but owning property or doing business in the United States is eligible to be a debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 109,” the requirement can be difficult if the foreign entity or individual domiciled abroad has no commercial connection to the US. Consequently, the property component of Section 109(a) has …

Discharge Under Section 524(A) Does Not Preclude A Suit To Recover From A Debtor’S Insurer, Michael P. Pitre

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a discharge of a debt “operates as an injunction against the commencement or continuation of an action . . . to collect, recover, or offset any debt as a personal liability of the debtor.” This discharge is the “principle advantage bankruptcy offers an individual” because it provides the debtor with a “fresh start” by freeing him from the chains of previous debts.

Even so, a “discharge in bankruptcy does not extinguish the debt itself, but merely releases the debtor from personal liability for the debt.” Therefore, as provided …

Banks That Collect Debt On Their Own Account Are Not Debt Collectors Under The Fdcpa, Antonia Edwards

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (the “FDCPA”) was enacted in 1977 to stop debt collectors from engaging in unfair and deceptive practices when collecting consumer debts. The FDCPA was enacted as a response to an abundance of evidence of the use of abusive and deceptive practices by many debt collectors. Collection abuse took many different methods such as threats of violence, telephone calls at unreasonable hours, impersonation, misrepresentation of debts, and collection of information under false pretenses. These unfair practices contributed to household bankruptcies, marital instability, loss of jobs, and invasions of individual privacy. The FDCPA imposes three …

United States V. White, 365 B.R. 457, Robert Griswold

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In U.S. v. White, 365 B.R. 457 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 2007), the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania addressed the issue of whether the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) may setoff the entire pre-petition debt against pre-petition claims that have been declared exempt, or whether the IRS is only allowed to setoff up to the amount of the priority claim. The court held that the IRS may setoff the entire debt and is not limited to the amount of the priority claim.

The proper treatment of the IRS’ setoff right in bankruptcy is unclear because of …