Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (27)
- Constitutional Law (14)
- Courts (13)
- First Amendment (5)
- Judges (5)
-
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Law and Philosophy (5)
- Law and Politics (5)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (5)
- Law and Gender (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Religion Law (3)
- American Politics (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Common Law (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- Law and Race (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Legal Studies (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Political Science (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Institution
-
- Duquesne University (4)
- St. John's University School of Law (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- Columbia Law School (2)
-
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (2)
- Washington University in St. Louis (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Gettysburg College (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Northern Illinois University (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Connecticut (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Rhode Island (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Hallowed Secularism (4)
- Articles (3)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Popular Media (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (2)
- Utah Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- College of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Honors Scholar Theses (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- SCI Papers & Reports (1)
- Senior Honors Projects (1)
- Senior Honors Theses (1)
- Student Publications (1)
- Supreme Court Overviews (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
Articles 31 - 41 of 41
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Right Family, Noa Ben-Asher, Margot J. Pollans
The Right Family, Noa Ben-Asher, Margot J. Pollans
Faculty Publications
The family plays a starring role in American law. Families, the law tells us, are special. They merit many state and federal benefits, including tax deductions, testimonial privileges, untaxed inheritance, and parental presumptions. Over the course of the twentieth century, the Supreme Court expanded individual rights stemming from familial relationships. In this Article, we argue that the concept of family in American law matters just as much when it is ignored as when it is featured. We contrast policies in which the family is the key unit of analysis with others in which it is not. Looking at four seemingly …
The Traditions Of American Constitutional Law, Marc O. Degirolami
The Traditions Of American Constitutional Law, Marc O. Degirolami
Faculty Publications
This Article identifies a new method of constitutional interpretation: the use of tradition as constitutive of constitutional meaning. It studies what the Supreme Court means by invoking tradition and whether what it means remains constant across the document and over time. Traditionalist interpretation is pervasive, consistent, and recurrent across the Court’s constitutional doctrine. So, too, are criticisms of traditionalist interpretation. There are also more immediate reasons to study the role of tradition in constitutional interpretation. The Court’s two newest members, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, have indicated that tradition informs their understanding of constitutional meaning. The study of traditionalist …
The Final Frontier: Are Class Action Waivers In Broker-Dealer Employment Agreements Enforceable?, Jill I. Gross
The Final Frontier: Are Class Action Waivers In Broker-Dealer Employment Agreements Enforceable?, Jill I. Gross
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
How would a court resolve a broker-dealer's action to enforce its class action waiver, which would require the court to disregard FINRA Rule 13204? The Supreme Court has identified one exception to the FAA's mandate: if a “contrary congressional command” displaces the FAA. Thus far, the Court has not had occasion to examine whether a class action waiver in a broker-dealer's employment agreement with an employee is enforceable under this exception. While the Court seems very supportive of these waivers, the securities industry is different. Securities arbitration is heavily regulated, and pronouncements by the SEC--when exercising power expressly delegated to …
Public Rights After Oil States Energy, Adam J. Macleod
Public Rights After Oil States Energy, Adam J. Macleod
Faculty Articles
The concept of public rights plays an important role in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the United States. But as the decision in Oil States last Term revealed, the Court has often used the term to refer to three different concepts with different jurisprudential implications. Using insights drawn from historical and analytical jurisprudence, this Article distinguishes the three concepts and examines how each of them is at work in patent law. A precise reading of Oil States also bears lessons for other areas of law that implicate both private rights and duties and the administration of public regulatory …
Supreme Court Of The United States, October Term 2020 Preview, Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute
Supreme Court Of The United States, October Term 2020 Preview, Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute
Supreme Court Overviews
No abstract provided.
India’S First Period: Constitutional Doctrine And Constitutional Stability, Madhav Khosla
India’S First Period: Constitutional Doctrine And Constitutional Stability, Madhav Khosla
Faculty Scholarship
Studies on constitutional stability and endurance rarely gesture toward the role of legal doctrine. While the workings of courts are often considered in understanding how a constitutional order might be sustained, this is almost variably achieved by examining the relationship between courts and other institutions. This chapter takes a different approach and studies the way in which constitutional consolidation might also be shaped by the doctrinal orientations and forms of reasoning that courts adopt. It does so by considering the first period of Indian constitutionalism. The focus is on two specific areas: the place of the Directive Principles in India’s …
Untangling Entanglement, Stephanie H. Barclay
Untangling Entanglement, Stephanie H. Barclay
Journal Articles
The Court has increasingly signaled its interest in taking a more historical approach to the Establishment Clause. And in its recent American Legion decision, the Supreme Court strongly suggested that the three-prong Lemon test is essentially dead letter. Such a result would make sense for the first two prongs of the Lemon test about secular purpose and the effects. Many scholars have observed that these aspects of the prong are judicial creations far afield of the Establishment Clause history. But what of the entanglement prong of the test? If we rejected all applications of this prong of the analysis, would …
Our Kardashian Court (And How To Fix It), Suzanna Sherry
Our Kardashian Court (And How To Fix It), Suzanna Sherry
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The Supreme Court is broken. After cataloging its dysfunctions, this Article suggests a contributing cause and proposes a solution. The contributing cause is that Justices have become celebrities, and, like other celebrities, play to their fan base. The solution is to limit their opportunities to use their official status to do so: Congress should pass a law prohibiting concurring or dissenting opinions and requiring each case to be decided by an unsigned opinion that does not disclose the number of Justices who join it. The Article outlines the advantages of such a law and considers possible objections to it, including …
Intratextual And Intradoctrinal Dimensions Of The Constitutional Home, Gerald S. Dickinson
Intratextual And Intradoctrinal Dimensions Of The Constitutional Home, Gerald S. Dickinson
Articles
The home has been lifted to a special pantheon of rights and protections in American constitutional law. Until recently, a conception of special protections for the home in the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause was under-addressed by scholars. However, a contemporary and robust academic treatment of a home-centric takings doctrine merits a different approach to construction and interpretation: the intratextual and intradoctrinal implications of a coherent set of homebound protections across the Bill of Rights, including the Takings Clause.
Intratextualism and intradoctrinalism are interpretive methods of juxtaposing non-adjoining and adjoining clauses in the Constitution and Supreme Court doctrines to find patterns …
The Supreme Court’S Two Constitutions: A First Look At The “Reverse Polarity” Cases, Arthur D. Hellman
The Supreme Court’S Two Constitutions: A First Look At The “Reverse Polarity” Cases, Arthur D. Hellman
Articles
In the traditional approach to ideological classification, “liberal” judicial decisions are those that support civil liberties claims; “conservative” decisions are those that reject them. That view – particularly associated with the Warren Court era – is reflected in numerous academic writings and even an article by a prominent liberal judge. Today, however, there is mounting evidence that the traditional assumptions about the liberal-conservative divide are incorrect or at best incomplete. In at least some areas of constitutional law, the traditional characterizations have been reversed. Across a wide variety of constitutional issues, support for claims under the Bill of Rights or …
Symposium: The Puzzling And Troubling Grant In Kisor, Gillian E. Metzger
Symposium: The Puzzling And Troubling Grant In Kisor, Gillian E. Metzger
Faculty Scholarship
From one perspective, the Supreme Court’s decision to grant review in Kisor v. Wilkie is not surprising. Dating back at least to Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2011 concurrence in Talk America v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., through Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center in 2013 and Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association in 2015, there’s been growing interest on the Supreme Court’s conservative wing in overturning Auer deference, or the doctrine that an agency’s interpretation of its own regulation is “controlling unless plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.” The campaign to overturn Auer v. Robbins then stalled, with the court denying …